Price responsiveness of supply and acreage in the EU vegetable oil markets: policy implications

Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano and Di Gioia, Leonardo and Lamonaca, Emilia (2020): Price responsiveness of supply and acreage in the EU vegetable oil markets: policy implications. Forthcoming in: Land Use Policy

Abstract

Vegetable oil market is becoming of increasing interest in the global biofuel industry. This phenomenon has also interested the European Union (EU), where the growing expansion of biofuel production is affected by political interventions promoting fuel security and environmental goals. Yet, empirical evidence on the impacts that changes in price of one commodity may have on the supply of another commodity are rather scant. We investigate these dynamics for the major sources of biodiesel in the EU and conclude on cross-commodity linkages for palm, rapeseed, soy, and sunflower oils. We also examine the acreage response of domestically produced feedstocks to changes in prices of vegetable oils. Our findings suggest strong and diversified path dependencies among vegetable oils that should be considered in planning sustainable biofuel policies. In particular, the empirical analysis reveals the great relevance of sunflower and soy oils, which show a high price responsiveness, and the high competition in end uses of domestically produced vegetable oils (i.e. rapeseed, soy, and sunflower oils), that tend to be net substitutes in supply. In terms of land use effects, we find that an increase in the price of imported palm oil results in a displacement effect in land devoted to rapeseed cultivation, whereas a surge in the price of sunflower oil decreases the use of land for rapeseed. Land use effects would be relevant in northern EU countries where the production of rapeseed is the most intense. A policy measure in the EU, incentivising the production of renewable and environmental-friendly fuel from sustainable feedstocks, would be positive for the domestic market to the extent that it stimulates the production of vegetable oils (soy and sunflower oils) with the highest direct and indirect emissions saving. However, the expansion of oil palm plantations in extra-EU producing countries and of imports to the EU would determine important impacts in terms of indirect land use change emissions and direct emissions due to increased transports.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Biofuel; Land Use Change; Price elasticity; Vegetable oils
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P28 - Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q21 - Demand and Supply ; Prices; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources

References

Araujo Enciso, S.R., Fellmann, T., Dominguez, I.P., Santini, F., 2016. Abolishing biofuel policies: Possible impacts on agricultural price levels, price variability and global food security. Food Policy 61, 9-26.

Arnade, C., Kelch, D., 2007. Estimation of area elasticities from a standard profit function. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(3), 727-737.

Askari, H., Cummings, J.T., 1977. Estimating agricultural supply response with the Nerlove model: a survey. International Economic Review 257-292.

Babcock, B.A., 2012. The impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility. China Agricultural Economic Review 4(4), 407-426.

Baier, S.L., Clements, M., Griffiths, C.W., Ihrig, J.E., 2009. Biofuels impact on crop and food prices: using an interactive spreadsheet. FRB International Finance Discussion Paper 967.

Banse, M., van Meijl, H., Tabeau, A., Woltjer, G., 2008. Will EU biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets?. European Review of Agricultural Economics 35(2), 117-141.

Bayramoglu, B., Chakir, R., 2016. The impact of high crop prices on the use of agro-chemical inputs in France: A structural econometric analysis. Land Use Policy 55, 204-211.

Britz, W., Hertel, T.W., 2011. Impacts of EU biofuels directives on global markets and EU environmental quality: An integrated PE, global CGE analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 142(1-2), 102-109.

Cai, X., Zhang, X., Wang, D., 2010. Land availability for biofuel production. Environmental Science & Technology 45(1), 334-339.

Chanthawong, A., Dhakal, S., Jongwanich, J., 2016. Supply and demand of biofuels in the fuel market of Thailand: Two stage least square and three least square approaches. Energy 114, 431-443.

Chavas, J.P., Holt, M.T., 1990. Acreage decisions under risk: the case of corn and soybeans. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(3), 529-538.

Choi, J.S., Helmberger, P.G., 1993. Acreage response, expected price functions, and endogenous price expectations. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37-46.

Delta, B.C., 2011. Review of IFPRI Reports on Land Use Change from European Biofuel Policies. Brussels: European Biodiesel Board.

Edwards, R., Padella, M., Giuntoli, J., Koeble, R., O’Connell, A., Bulgheroni, C., Marelli, L., 2017. Definition of input data to assess GHG default emissions from biofuels in EU legislation. Version 1c – July 2017, EUR 28349 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Efroymson, R.A., Kline, K.L., Angelsen, A., Verburg, P.H., Dale, V.H., Langeveld, J.W., McBride, A. 2016. A causal analysis framework for land-use change and the potential role of bioenergy policy. Land Use Policy 59, 516-527.

Elbehri, A., Segerstedt, A., Liu, P., 2013. Biofuels and the Sustainability Challenge: a Global Assessment of Sustainability Issues, Trends and Policies for Biofuels and Related Feedstocks. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

European Commission, 2019a. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the status of production expansion of relevant food and feed crops worldwide. European Commission, Brussels, March 13, 2019.

European Commission, 20192. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 as regards the determination of high indirect land-use change-risk feedstock for which a significant expansion of the production area into land with high carbon stock is observed and the certification of low indirect land use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels. European Commission, Brussels, March 13, 2019.

European Union, 2019. Palm Oil: What is new in the EU Legislation? European Union, Delegation of the European Union to Indonesia, Jakarta, March 21, 2019.

European Union Aviation Safety Agency, 2019. European Aviation Environmental Report.

Garrett, R.D., Lambin, E.F., Naylor, R.L., 2013. Land institutions and supply chain configurations as determinants of soybean planted area and yields in Brazil. Land Use Policy 31, 385-396.

Go, Y.H., Lau, W.Y., 2017. Investor demand, market efficiency and spot-futures relation: Further evidence from crude palm oil. Resources Policy 53, 135-146.

Guyomard, H., Baudry, M., Carpentier, A., 1996. Estimating crop supply response in the presence of farm programmes: application to the CAP. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23(4), 401-420.

Haile, M.G., Kalkuhl, M., von Braun, J., 2016. Worldwide Acreage and Yield Response to International Price Change and Volatility: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis for Wheat, Rice, Corn, and Soybeans. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98 (1), 172–90.

Hamulczuk, M., Makarchuk, O., Sica, E., 2019. Searching for market integration: Evidence from Ukrainian and European Union rapeseed markets. Land Use Policy 87, 104078.

Hendricks, N.P., Smith, A., Sumner, D.A., 2014. Crop supply dynamics and the illusion of partial adjustment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(5), 1469-1491.

Hendricks, N. P., Janzen, J. P., Smith, A., 2015. Futures prices in supply analysis: Are instrumental variables necessary?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97(1), 22-39.

Humalisto, N.H. 2015. Climate policy integration and governing indirect land-use changes—Actors in the EU's biofuel policy-formulation. Land Use Policy 45, 150-158.

Hunsberger, C., German, L., Goetz, A., 2017. “Unbundling” the biofuel promise: Querying the ability of liquid biofuels to deliver on socio-economic policy expectations. Energy Policy 108, 791-805.

ICCT, 2019. International policy and market drivers of Indonesian palm oil demand. ICCT Fact Sheet, January 2019.

IMF 2007. IMF Survey: Biofuel Demand Pushes Up Food Prices. IMF Research.

International Energy Agency (IEA), International Renewable Energy Agency (IREA), United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD), World Bank (WB), World Health Organization (WHO), 2019. Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2019: Main Report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

Kim, H., Moschini, G., 2018. The dynamics of supply: US corn and soybeans in the biofuel era. Land Economics 94(4), 593-613.

Koçar, G., Civaş, N., 2013. An overview of biofuels from energy crops: Current status and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 28, 900-916.

Lee, D.R., Helmberger, P.G., 1985. Estimating supply response in the presence of farm programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(2), 193-203.

OECD, 2008. Biofuel Support Policies: An Economic Assessment. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

OECD-FAO, 2019. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019-2028. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, and Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.

Oliveira, G. de L.T., McKay, B., Plank, C., 2017. How biofuel policies backfire: Misguided goals, inefficient mechanisms, and political-ecological blind spots. Energy Policy 108, 765-775.

Peri, M., Baldi, L., 2013. The effect of biofuel policies on feedstock market: Empirical evidence for rapeseed oil prices in EU. Resource and Energy Economics 35, 118-37.

Rajcaniova, M., Drabik, D., Ciaian, P., 2013. How policies affect international biofuel price linkages. Energy Policy 59, 857-865.

Santeramo F.G., Searle, S., 2019. Linking soy oil demand from the US Renewable Fuel Standard to palm oil expansion through an analysis on vegetable oil price elasticities. Energy Policy 127, 19-23.

Santeramo, F.G., Searle, S., 2020. Reply to Taheripour, Delgado and Tyner (2020). Energy Policy 111460.

Santeramo, F.G. 2015. A cursory review of the identification strategies Agricultural and Food Economics 3(1), 3-24.

Santeramo, F.G., Lamonaca, E., Tappi, M., Di Gioia, L. 2020. On the Environmental Impacts of Voluntary Animal-based Policies in the EU: Technical and Political Considerations. Environmental Science & Policy. In Press.

Schaffartzik, A., Plank, C., Brad, A., 2014. Ukraine and the great biofuel potential? A political material flow analysis. Ecological Economics 104, 12-21.

Schulte, R.P., O’Sullivan, L., Vrebos, D., Bampa, F., Jones, A., Staes, J., 2019. Demands on land: Mapping competing societal expectations for the functionality of agricultural soils in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy 100, 113-125.

Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., Yu, T.H., 2008. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319(5867), 1238-1240.

Shideed, K.H., White, F.C., 1989. Alternative forms of price expectations in supply analysis for US corn and soybean acreages. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14(1836-2016-150808), 281.

Singh, S.P., Singh, D., 2010. Biodiesel production through the use of different sources and characterization of oils and their esters as the substitute of diesel: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(1), 200-216.

Stout, J., Abler, D., 2004. ERS/Penn State trade model documentation.

Tomei, J., Helliwell, R. 2016. Food versus fuel? Going beyond biofuels. Land Use Policy 56, 320-326.

USDA FAS, 2019. EU Biofuels Annual. GAIN Report NL9022.

Vasile, A.J., Andreea, I.R., Popescu, G.H., Elvira, N., Marian, Z. 2016. Implications of agricultural bioenergy crop production and prices in changing the land use paradigm—the case of Romania. Land Use Policy 50, 399-407.

Villoria, N.B., Liu, J., 2018. Using spatially explicit data to improve our understanding of land supply responses: An application to the cropland effects of global sustainable irrigation in the Americas. Land Use Policy 75, 411-419.