The Disparity of Revenue and Expenditure among Subnational Governments in Vietnam

Vo, Duc (2019): The Disparity of Revenue and Expenditure among Subnational Governments in Vietnam. Published in: Emerging Markets Finance and Trade

Abstract

Fiscal decentralization has attracted attention from government, academic studies, and international institutions with the aims of enhancing economic growth in recent years. One of the difficult issues is to measure satisfactorily the degree of fiscal decentralization across countries. The fiscal decentralisation index, the first of its kind, was recently developed in 2010. This newly developed index accounts for both fiscal autonomy and fiscal importance of subnational governments. We argue that while Vo’s index is an advance on current practice, it is still not perfect as it assumes there is no dispersion of revenue and expenditure across regions. In response to this weakness, fiscal entropy and fiscal inequality measures are developed using information theory. It is shown how fiscal inequality can be decomposed regionally and hierarchically. These ideas are illustrated with an emerging country data— Vietnam—pertaining to the national, provincial, and local levels of governments.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Autonomy, fiscal decentralisation index, theil’s entropy, vietnam
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H29 - Other; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs

References

Ahmad, E., and J. Craig. 1997. Intergovernmental transfers. In Fiscal federalism in theory and practice, ed. T. Ter- Minassian (pp. 73–107). Washington D.C: International Monetary Fund. Between-set 63.9% Within-set 36.1%

Bird, R. M., and M. Smart. 2002. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. Canada: University of Toronto

Davoodi, H., and H. F. Zou. 1998. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics 43:244–57. doi:10.1006/juec.1997.2042.

Liu, Y., J. Martinez, and A. Wu. 2017. (2017). “Fiscal decentralization, equalization, and intra-provincial inequality in China”. International Tax Public Finance 24:248–81. doi:10.1007/s10797-016-9416-1.

Martinez-Vazquez, J., S. Lago-Pe˜nas, and A. Sacchi. 2016. The impact of fiscal decentralisation: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 31 (4):1095–129. doi:10.1111/joes.12182.

McLure, C., and J. Martinez-Vazquez. 2004. The assignment of revenues and expenditures in intergovernmental fiscal relations. The World Bank.

McLure, E. C., Jr. (2001), “The tax assignment problem: Conceptual and administrative considerations in achieving subnational fiscal autonomy.” Document prepared for Fiscal Policy Training Program, The World Bank Institute, Washington DC.

Musgrave, R. A. 1959. The theory of public finance – A study in public economy, McGraw. New York: Hill Book Company, Inc.

Oates, W. E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Theil, H. 1967. Economics and information theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

Vo, H. D. 2009. Fiscal decentralisation in Vietnam: Lessons from selected Asian nations. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 14 (4):399–419. doi:10.1080/13547860903169373.

Vo, H. D. 2010 September. The Economics of Fiscal decentralisation. Journal of Economic Surveys 24(4):657–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00600.x.

Woller, G. M., and K. Phillips. 1998. Fiscal decentralization and LDC economic growth: An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Studies 34 (4):139–48. doi:10.1080/00220389808422532.