Multi-market firms and export quota: effects of withdrawal of the multi fiber arrangement

Kar, Saibal and Kar, Mausumi (2016): Multi-market firms and export quota: effects of withdrawal of the multi fiber arrangement. Published in:

Abstract

The international trade in goods and services is dominated by multi-market firms. A firm’s decision to sell in the domestic market vis-à-vis the foreign market depends on a number of factors including transport costs, price uncertainties and the barriers to trade. We study the effect of a reduction in non-tariff barriers or quotas on the optimal decision of firms to allocate output between the domestic market and the foreign market. We offer a theoretical analysis on how the firms reallocate sales between multiple markets when the exogenous barriers are lifted. We find that the theoretical conjecture might get valid support from the evolving pattern of exports by a large number of textile and apparel manufacturing firms originating in India. Principally, we obtain a condition under which the choice of the firm to operate in multiple markets depends on the relative strengths of how profit at the margin reacts to price uncertainty in one of the markets as compared to the effect of the sales in one market on the price of another. It seems that the withdrawal of the quota since 2005 has led to a greater focus on the domestic market for Indian firms and within the country there has also been an increased concentration of firms. We used the Hirschman-Herfindahl Index to measure if the Indian firms have become more concentrated in terms of sales during the previous two decades. The concentration of firms has unambiguously increased in the last two years.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Multi-market firm, MFA, export quotas, textile, India
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing

References

Appelbaum, Richard P, E. Bonacich and K. Quan (2005), The End of Apparel Quotas: A Faster Race to the Bottom?. Center for Global Studies. UC Santa Barbara: Center for Global Studies. Retrieved from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/40f8w19g

Dalal, A and E. Katz (2003), The multi-market firm, transportation costs, and the separation of the output and allocation decisions, Oxford Economic Papers, 55, 644–656.

Knappe, M. (2003), Textiles and Clothing: What Happens After 2005?, International Trade Forum, International Trade center, Issue 2, page 16.

Gereffi, G., Industrial Adjustment in the North Carolina Textile and Clothing Industry, Presentation at the Global Apparel/Clothing Europe Conference at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, October 15 -16, 2004, www.unc.edu/depts/europe/conferences/04/global/papers.htm

Gherzi Report (2003), Benchmarking of Costs of Production of Textile Products in India vis-à-vis China, Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, Geneva: Swiss Textile Organization.

Gibbon, P (2008), Governance, entry barriers, upgrading: Re-interpretation of some GVC concepts from the experience of African garment exports, Competition and Change, 12 (1):29-48.

Harris, R (1985), Why Voluntary Export Restraints Are 'Voluntary', The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 799-809

Hashim, D. A., ‘Post – MFA: Making the Textile and Garment Industry Competitive’, Economic and Political Weekly, January 8, 2005.

Kar, M (2012), National and Global Aspects of India’s Textiles and Apparel Industry and Trade: An Overview, South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, 1, 1, 81-134.

Kar, M and S. Kar (2014), Trade Policy and Inequality: Evidence from Post-MFA India and a Theoretical Model, forthcoming, UNU-WIDER Working Paper Series.

Kar, M and S. Kar (2011) The Multi Fibre Arrangement and South Asia, in S. Mansoob Murshed et al. (eds.) South-South Globalisation Challenges and Opportunities for Development, UK: Routledge.

Katz, E. and Paroush, J. (1979), The effect of forward markets on exporting firms, Economics Letters, 4, 272–4. Krishna, K (1988), What Do Voluntary Export Restraints Do? NBER Working Paper No. 2612, NBER, Cambridge: Mass.

Marjit, S, T. Kabiraj and A. Mukherjee, Quota as a Competitive Device, in Takashi Kamigashi and Laixun Zhao (Eds.) International Trade and Economic Dynamics: Essays in Memory of Koji Shimomura, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009.

Richardson, D.J., ‘Constant Market Share Analysis of Export Growth’, Journal of International Economics, Vol.1, 1971.

Tewari, M (2006), Adjustments in India's textile and apparel industry: Reworking historical legacies in a post-MFA world, Environment and Planning A, 38 (12): 2325-2344.

Trela, I. and J. Whalley, ‘Global Effects of Developed Country Trade Restrictions on Textiles and Apparel’, The Economic Journal, Vol.100, No.403, December 1990, pp. 1190-1205.

United Nations Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2005), TNCs and the Removal of Textiles and Clothing Quotas, Current Studies in FDI and Development, UNCTAD, New York and Geneva.

United States International Trade Commission (USITC), Textiles and Apparel: Assessment of the Competitiveness of Certain Foreign Suppliers to the US Market, Washington D.C., Report declassified in January 2004.

Yano, M (1989), Voluntary Export Restraints and Expectations: An Analysis of Export Quotas in Oligopolistic Markets, International Economic Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 707-723.