Patent Policy and Economic Growth: A Survey

Chu, Angus C. (2020): Patent Policy and Economic Growth: A Survey.

Abstract

This survey provides a selective review of the literature on patent policy, innovation and economic growth. The patent system is a useful policy tool for stimulating innovation given its importance on technological progress and economic growth. However, the patent system is a multi-dimensional system, which features multiple patent policy instruments. In this survey, we review some of the commonly discussed patent policy instruments, such as patent length, patent breadth and blocking patents, and also use a canonical Schumpeterian growth model to demonstrate their different effects on innovation and the macroeconomy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: patent policy, innovation, economic growth
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

Acemoglu, D., and Akcigit, U., 2012. Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 1-42.

Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., and Howitt, P., 2014. What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory?. Handbook of Economic Growth, 2, 515-563.

Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., and Vickers, J., 2001. Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Review of Economic Studies, 68, 467-492.

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.

Bessen, J., 2008. The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37, 932-945.

Chou, C., and Shy, O. 1993. The crowding-out effects of long duration of patents. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 304-312.

Chu, A., 2009. Effects of blocking patents on R&D: a quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth, 14, 55-78.

Chu, A., 2010a. Effects of patent length on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economics, 99, 117-140.

Chu, A., 2010b. Effects of patent policy on income and consumption inequality in an R&D-based growth model. Southern Economic Journal, 77, 336-350.

Chu, A., 2011. The welfare cost of one-size-fits-all patent protection. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 876-890.

Chu, A., and Cozzi, G., 2018. Effects of patents versus R&D subsidies on income inequality. Review of Economic Dynamics, 29, 68-84.

Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Fan, H., Pan, S., and Zhang, M., 2020. Do stronger patents stimulate or stifle innovation? The crucial role of financial development. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52, 305-1322.

Chu, A., Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2012. Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review, 56, 727-746.

Chu, A., and Furukawa, Y., 2011. On the optimal mix of patent instruments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 1964-1975.

Chu, A., Furukawa, Y., and Ji, L., 2016. Patents, R&D subsidies and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. Southern Economic Journal, 82, 809-825.

Chu, A., Furukawa, Y., Mallick, S., Peretto, P., and Wang, X., 2020. Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a Schumpeterian economy. MPRA Paper No. 102281.

Chu, A., Kou, Z., and Wang, X., 2020. Effects of patents on the transition from stagnation to growth. Journal of Population Economics, 33, 395-411.

Chu, A., and Pan, S., 2013. The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 17, 955-969.

Cozzi, G., 2001. Inventing or spying? Implications for growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 55-77.

Cozzi, G., 2007. The Arrow effect under competitive R&D. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Contributions), 7, Article 2.

Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2014. Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 19, 183-219.

Cozzi, G., Giordani, P., and Zamparelli, L., 2007. The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 788-797.

Cozzi, G., and Spinesi, L., 2006. Intellectual appropriability, product differentiation, and growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 10, 39-55.

Denicolo, V., 2001. Growth with non-drastic innovations and the persistence of leadership. European Economic Review, 45, 1399-1413.

Foellmi, R., and Zweimuller, J., 2006. Income distribution and demand-induced innovations. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 941-960.

Furukawa, Y., 2007. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better?. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3644-3670.

Furukawa, Y., 2013. The struggle to survive in the R&D sector: Implications for innovation and growth. Economics Letters, 121, 26-29.

Futagami, K., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory, 132, 306-334.

Gilbert, R., and Shapiro, C., 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 106-112.

Ginarte, J., and Park, W., 1997. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26, 283-301.

Goh, A.-T., and Olivier, J., 2002. Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review, 43, 1191-1214.

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.

Helpman, E., 1993. Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights. Econometrica, 61, 1247-1280.

Horii, R., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights. Journal of Economics, 90, 45-85.

Iwaisako, T., 2020. Welfare effects of patent protection in a semi-endogenous growth model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24, 708-728.

Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2003. Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics, 78, 239-258.

Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2013. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory, 52, 631-668.

Jones, C., and Williams, J., 1998. Measuring the social return to R&D. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1119-1135.

Jones, C., and Williams, J., 2000. Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 65-85.

Judd, K., 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica, 53, 567-586.

Kiedaisch, C., 2015. Intellectual property rights in a quality-ladder model with persistent leadership. European Economic Review, 80, 194-213.

Kiedaisch, C., 2020. Growth and welfare effects of intellectual property rights when consumers differ in income. Economic Theory, forthcoming.

Klemperer, P., 1990. How broad should the scope of patent protection be?. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 113-130.

Kwan, Y., and Lai, E., 2003. Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27, 853-873.

Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal, 111, C164-C179.

Li, C.-W., 2003. Endogenous growth without scale effects: Comment. American Economic Review, 93, 1009-1017.

Li, T., and Qiu, L., 2014. IPR, trade, FDI, and technology transfer. Frontiers of Economics in China, 9, 529-555.

Niwa, S., 2016. Patent claims and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 54, 377-381.

Niwa, S., 2018. Effects of a blocking patent on R&D with endogenous survival activities. Journal of Economics, 125, 263-277.

O'Donoghue, T., 1998. A patentability requirement for sequential innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 29, 654-679.

O'Donoghue, T., and Zweimuller, J., 2004. Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 81-123.

Pakes, A., 1986. Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica, 54, 755-784.

Park, W., 2008. Intellectual property rights and international innovation. In K. Maskus (ed.), Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, vol. 2, 289-327, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Peretto, P., 2007. Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 353-382.

Peretto, P., 2015. From Smith to Schumpeter: A theory of take-off and convergence to sustained growth. European Economic Review, 78, 1-26.

Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.

Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.

Saito, Y., 2017. Effects of patent protection on economic growth and welfare in a two-R&D-sector economy. Economic Modelling, 62, 124-129.

Schankerman, M., and Pakes, A., 1986. Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. Economic Journal, 96, 1052-1076.

Segerstrom, P., 1998. Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review, 88, 1290-1310.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-91.

Solow, R., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.

Yang, Y., 2013. Optimal patent policy, research joint ventures, and growth. Economics Letters, 118, 381-384.

Yang, Y., 2018. On the optimality of IPR protection with blocking patents. Review of Economic Dynamics, 27, 205-230.

Zweimuller, J., 2000. Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel's law: The impact of inequality on innovation-driven growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 185-206.