Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries

Sharma, Rajesh and Sinha, Avik and Kautish, Pradeep (2020): Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries. Published in: Environmental Science and Pollution Research , Vol. 27, (2020): pp. 36970-36982.

Abstract

The reexamination of the existing economic and environmental policies in the South and Southeast Asian countries seems to be necessary, as these countries are struggling to achieve the goals of sustainable development. For suggesting a long-term environmental policy, we intend to examine whether the selected economic and demographic indicators have influenced the ecological footprint in the eight developing countries of Asia for the period of 1990-2015. The use of pooled mean group (PMG) approach allowed driving the long-run common coefficients, which may facilitate us to develop a common policy framework to fortify the environmental quality. The computed results confirmed that the selected variable are cointegrated in the long run; and, per capita income, nonrenewable energy usage, urbanization, fertility rate, and population density are observed as the significant drivers of the environmental pollution. On the other hand, renewable energy consumption restored the environmental quality in these countries. Based on the results, we recommend the need for the diversification of the energy-basket where the use of renewable energy resources to be enhanced. Further, by sensitizing the necessity of environmental conservation, governments should promote less carbon-intense economic and demographic practices across the industries and sectors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ecological footprint; South and Southeast Asia; Energy; Urbanization
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling

References

Acharyya, J., 2009. FDI, growth and the environment: evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. Journal of Economic Development 34 (1), 43-58.

Al-mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., Mohammed, A., 2015. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315-323.

Alola, A., 2019. The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: accounting for environmental sustainability. Science of The Total Environment 658, 260-267.

Alola, A. A., Arikewuyo, A. O., Ozad, B., Alola, U. V., Arikewuyo, H. O., 2019a. A drain or drench on biocapacity? Environmental account of fertility, marriage, and ICT in the USA and Canada. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27, 4032-4043.

Alola, A., Bekum, F., Sarkodie, S., 2019. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment 685, 702-709.

Baltagi, B., Bratberg, E., Holmas, T., 2005. A panel data study of physicians' labor supply: the case of Norway. Health Economics 14 (10), 1035-1045.

Birdsall, N., 1992. Another look at population and global warming. Policy Research Working Paper Series 1020, The World Bank, Population, health, and nutrition, Washington, D.C.

Cafaro, P., 2012. Climate ethics and population policy. Climate Change 3 (1), 45-61.

Charfeddine, L., 2017. The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov Switching Equilibrium Correction Model. Energy Economics 65, 355-374.

Danish, B., Wang, Z.W., 2017. Energy production, economic growth and CO2 emission: evidence from Pakistan. Natural Hazards 90 (1), 27-50.

Destek, M., Sarkodie, S., 2019. Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Science of the Total Environment 650, 2483-2489.

Destek, M.A., Sinha, A., 2020. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537.

Dietz, T., Rosa, E., York., 2007. Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (1), 13-18.

Dogan, E., Taspinar, N., Gokmenoglu, K., 2019. Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy & Environment 30 (6), 1065-1086.

Dong, K., Sun, R., Li, H., Liao, H., 2018. Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 94, 419-429.

Downey, L., Hawkins, B., 2008. Single-mother families and air pollution: a national study. Social Science Quarterly 89 (2), 523-536.

Dumitrescu, E., Hurlin, C., 2012. Testing for Granger Non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 29 (4), 1450-1460.

Feng, Z., Wu, J., 2011. Relationship between the ecological footprint and the economic growth in China. 2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, IEEE, Nanjing, China (pp. 6205-6211).

Friedl, B., Getzner, M., 2003. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics 45 (1), 133-148.

Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M., Wagner, N., Gorini, R., 2019. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews 24, 38-50.

Godfray, H., Garnetl, T., 2014. Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B 369 (1639), 1-10.

Greenpeace Southeast Asia., 2019. Latest air pollution data ranks world’s cities worst to best. https://www.greenpeace.org/southeastasia/press/679/latest-air-pollution-data-ranks-worlds-cities-worst-to-best/

Hasnat, G., Kabir, M., Hossain, M., 2018. Major environmental issues and problems of South Asia, particularly Bangladesh. In: Hussain, C. (Ed.) Handbook of Environmental Materials Management, Switzerland AG: Springer, Cham, (pp. 1-40).

Holtz-Eakin, D., Selden, T., 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 57 (1), 85-101.

Hubacek, K., Guan, D., Barrett, J., Wiedmann, T., 2009. Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprint. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 1241-1248.

Hubacek, K., Guan, D., Barrett, J., Wiedmann, T., 2009. Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprints. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (14), 1241-1248.

Isaksen, E., Narbel, P., 2017. A carbon footprint proportional to expenditure-a case for Norway? Ecological Economics 131, 152-165.

Karasoy, A., Akçay, S., 2019. Effects of renewable energy consumption and trade on environmental pollution. Management of Environmental Quality 30 (2), 437-455.

Khanal, R., Shrestha, S., 2005. Development of procedures and the assessment of EDB of local levels due to major environmental risk factors. Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu.

Khwaja, M., Umer, F., Shaheen, N., Sherazi, A., Shaheen, F., 2012. Air pollution reduction and control in South Asia. Working paper series 121 , Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Kolcava, D., Nguyen, Q., Bernauer, T., 2019. Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy? Ecological Economics 163, 98-112.

Liang, L., Wang, Z., Li, J., 2019. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production 237 (10 November 2019), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619324990.

Liu, J., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Luck, G., 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421, 530-533.

MacKinnon, J., 2002. Status of Biodiversity in Asia—ICEM. In: Carew-Reid, J. (Ed.) Biodiversity Planning in Asia, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. Gland, (pp. 49-72).

Marquart-Pyatt, S., 2015. Environmental sustainability: the ecological footprint in West Africa. Human Ecology Review 22 (1), 73-92.

Nasir, M., Huynh, T., Tram, H., 2019. Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: a case of emerging ASEAN. Journal of Environmental Management 242, 131-141.

Nazir, M., Mahdi, A., Bilal, M., Sohail, H., Ali, N., Iqbal, H., 2019. Environmental impact and pollution-related challenges of renewable wind energy paradigm – a review. Science of The Total Environment 683, 436-444.

Newman, P., 2006. The environmental impact of cities. Environment and Urbanization 18 (2), 275-295.

Nguyen, D., Sévi, B., Sjö, B., Uddin, G., 2017. The role of trade openness and investment in examining the energy-growth-pollution nexus: empirical evidence for China and India. Applied Economics 49 (40), 4083-4098.

OECD., 2018. Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2018: fostering growth through digitalisation. OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/9789264286184-en:

Pedroni, P., 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (s1), 653-670.

Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., Smith, R., 1999. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of American Statistic Association 94 (446), 621-634.

Piaggio, M., Padilla, E., Román, C., 2017. The long-term relationship between CO2 emissions and economic activity in a small open economy: Uruguay 1882–2010. Energy Economics 65, 271-282.

PTI., 2018. CO2 emissions cost India USD 210 billion every year: study. The Economics Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/co2-emissions-cost-india-usd-210-billion-every-year-study/articleshow/65961331.cms?from=mdr.

PTI., 2019. India's pollution control policies unlikely to improve air quality: study. The Economic Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/indias-pollution-control-policies-unlikely-to-improve-air-quality-study/articleshow/68654604.cms?from=mdr.

Remuzgo, L., Sarabia, J., 2015. International inequality in CO2 emissions: a new factorial decomposition based on Kaya factors. Environmental Science & Policy 54, 15-24.

Ritchie, H., Roser, M., 2019. Urbanization, https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization#note-4

Rodríguez, M., Pena-Boquete, Y., 2017. Carbon intensity changes in the Asian Dragons. Lessons for climate policy design. Energy Economics 66, 17-26.

Sahoo, P., 2006. Foreign direct investment in South Asia: policy, trends, impact and determinants. ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 56, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.

Selden, T., Song, D., 1994. Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (2), 147-162.

Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M., Loganathan, N., 2015. Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecological Indicators 52, 379-393.

Shahbaz, M., Uddin, G., Rehman, I., Imran, K., 2014. Industrialization, electricity consumption and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 31, 575-586.

Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106-168.

Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Kumar, D., 2018. Assessing dynamism of crude oil demand in middle-income countries of South Asia: a panel data investigation. Global Business Review, 1-15, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0972150918795367.

Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Uddin, M., 2019. Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Management of Environmental Quality, 1-28, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2019-0099.

Squires, D., 2013. Biodiversity conservation in Asia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 1 (1), 144-159.

The Economic Times., 2019. Out of top 10 most polluted cities in the world, 7 cities are from India alone. The Economic Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/out-of-top-10-most-polluted-cities-in-the-world-7-cities-are-from-india-alone/south-asias-battle/slideshow/68266564.cms.

The World Bank., 2015. Malaysia among most urbanized countries in East Asia, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/01/26/malaysia-among-most-urbanized-countries-in-east-asia

Tjoek, P., Wu, P., 2018. Exploring the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 and SO2 for Southeast Asia in the 21st century context. Environmental Economics 9 (1), 7-21.

Todaro, M., Smith, S., 2017. Economic Development (12th ed.), Pearson Education, India.

Uddin, G., Salahuddin, M., Alam, A., Gow, J., 2017. Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecological Indicators 77, 166-175.

Ulucak, R., Bilgili, F., 2018. A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 188, 144-157.

UNDP., 2019. Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Development Programme: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2020. Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2020. Available at: https://www.unescap.org/publications/asia-and-pacific-sdg-progress-report-2020

Wackernagel, M., Rees, W., 1996. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publisher, Gabriola Island, BC.

World Bank., 2019. World Development Indicators, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator

Yorifuji, T., 2015. Health impact assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 in 27 Southeast and East Asian cities. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 57 (7), 751-756.