Bazhanov, Andrei (2020): A Comment on Hamilton (2016) "Measuring Sustainability in the UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting".
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_104316.pdf Download (259kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Hamilton (2016) shows that a general closed imperfect economy with extraction cost and any substitutability among inputs is sustainable along an exponentially decreasing path of extraction (EDP) under a generalized Hartwick rule with resource rent measured in SEEA-2012 (System of Environmental-Economic Accounting) units. Mathematically, the result is correct. The problem is that Hamilton offers this approach as "the correct policy rule for sustainability," although this saving rule may be inapplicable to real economies because the prescribed investment may exceed output. In particular, the Cobb-Douglas economy's output goes to zero along EDP even if there is no cost, no health damage from resource use, and all output is invested. The economy with infinite elasticity of substitution between the resource and capital may be sustainable along EDP depending on initial conditions. This result extends Hartwick (2003) disclaimer about substitutability among inputs to the generalized version of the rule. Moreover, the result shows that the assessment of sustainability and accounting prices for real economies depends, besides allocation mechanism, on specification of technology and initial conditions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Comment on Hamilton (2016) "Measuring Sustainability in the UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting" |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Natural nonrenewable resource; Imperfect economy; Resource policy; Sustainability accounting price |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development |
Item ID: | 104316 |
Depositing User: | Andrei Bazhanov |
Date Deposited: | 04 Dec 2020 02:48 |
Last Modified: | 04 Dec 2020 02:48 |
References: | Dasgupta, P., and G. Heal. 1974. The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41: 3-28. Dasgupta, P., and G. Heal. 1979. Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press. Hamilton, K. 2016. Measuring sustainability in the UN system of environmental-economic accounting. Environmental and Resource Economics 64 (1): 25-36. Hamilton, K., and J. Hartwick. 2005. Investing exhaustible resource rents and the path of consumption. Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (2): 615-621. Hamilton, K., and G. Ruta. 2017. Accounting price of an exhaustible resource: response and extensions. Environmental and Resource Economics 68 (3): 527-536. Hartwick, J. M. 2003. "Net investment" and sustainability. Nat. Resour. Model. 16 (2): 145-160. Mardones, C., and R. del Rio. 2019. Correction of Chilean GDP for natural capital depreciation and environmental degradation caused by copper mining. Resources Policy 60: 143-152. SEEA. 2014. System of environmental-economic accounting 2012: Central framework. United Nations. Bureau of the Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting: United Nations Publications. Solow, R. M. 1974. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41: 29-45. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/104316 |