Gender differences in overplacement in familiar and unfamiliar tasks: Far more similarities

Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Mesa-Vázquez, Ernesto and Rivera-Garrido, Noelia (2020): Gender differences in overplacement in familiar and unfamiliar tasks: Far more similarities.

Abstract

This paper explores gender differences in overplacement in two independent and unrelated tasks. The first measures performance via Raven’s Progressive Matrices test, the second in a video presentation assessed by external judges. While in the first task, we expected participants to have prior knowledge about their own experience in similar tasks, we did not expect them to have experience of the second task. Therefore, the latter seems an ideal environment in which to test overplacement given that participants had no ex-ante information with which to make performance predictions. In both cases, participants received monetary incentives depending on the accuracy of their predictions regarding their own performance compared to other participants. We analyzed overplacement – whether participants expect to outperform their actual performance compared to the entire sample – and in/out-group overplacement– whether the participants expect to outperform participants of the same and the opposite sex. Results show that there are no gender differences in any task except in Raven’s Progressive Matrices for out-group overplacement.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Overplacement, gender, experiments, in-group, out-group
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D84 - Expectations ; Speculations; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination

References

Alicke, M.D., Govorun, O., 2005. The better-than-average effect. The Self in Social Judgment, 1, 85-106. Antecol, H., 2000. An examination of cross-country differences in the gender gap in labor force participation rates. Labour Economics, 7(4), 409-426. Antecol, H., 2001. Why is there interethnic variation in the gender wage gap? The role of cultural factors. Journal of Human Resources, 119-143. Barber, B.M., Odean, T., 2001. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1): 261-292. Benabou, R., Tirole, J., 2002. Self-Confidence and Personal Motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 871–915. Biais, B., Hilton, D., Mazurier, K., Pouget, S., 2005. Judgemental overconfidence, self-monitoring, and trading performance in an experimental financial market. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(2), 287-312. Brañas-Garza, P., Estepa, L., Jorrat, D.A., Orozco, V., Rascón Ramírez, E., 2020. To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field. Mimeo. Brañas-Garza, P., Kujal, P., Lenkei, B., 2019. Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 82: 101455. Bucher-Koenen, T., Alessie, R., Lusardi, A., Van Rooij, M., 2016. Women, confidence, and financial literacy. Mimeo. Cabrera, J.M., Cid, A., 2017. Gender differences to relative performance feedback: A field experiment in education. Universidad de Montevideo wpaper 1704. Compte, O., Postlewaite, A., 2004. Confidence-enhanced performance. The American Economic Review, 94(5), 1536-57. Dahlbom, L., Jakobsson, A., Jakobsson, N., Kotsadam, A., 2011. Gender and overconfidence: are girls really overconfident? Applied Economics Letters, 18(4), 325-327. Deaves, R., Lüders, E., Luo, G.Y., 2009. An experimental test of the impact of overconfidence and gender on trading activity. Review of Finance, 13(3), 555-575. De Bondt, W.F., Thaler, R.H., 1995. Financial decision-making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective. In: Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 9, 385–410. Frederick, S., 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4):25-42. Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., Rustichini, A., 2003. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049-1074. Gneezy, U., Leonard, K.L., List, J.A., 2009. Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77(5), 1637-1664. Healy, A., Pate, J., 2007. Overconfidence, social groups, and gender: Evidence from the lab and field. https://ssrn.com/abstract=934320 Hedges L.V., Nowell A., 1995. Sex Differences in mental test Scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 269: 41–45. Holt, C.A., Laury, S.K., 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92(5):1644-1655. Hyde J., Lindberg S., Linn M., Ellis A., Williams C., 2008. Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science 321: 494–495. Jakobsson, N., Levin, M., Kotsadam, A., 2013. Gender and overconfidence: effects of context, gendered stereotypes, and peer group. Advances in Applied Sociology, 3(02), 137. Johnson, D.D., 2009. Overconfidence and war. Harvard University Press. Kanter, R.M., 2004. Confidence: How Winning Streaks and Losing Streaks Begin and End. New York, NY: Crown Business. Moore, D.A., Healy, P.J., 2008. The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502. Moore, D. A., & Dev, A.S., 2018. Individual differences in overconfidence. In: V. Zeigler-Hill and T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer. Muthukrishna, M., Henrich, J., Toyokawa, W., Hamamura, T., Kameda, T., Heine, S.J., 2018. Overconfidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals systematic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations. PLoS ONE 13(8), e0202288. Nekby, L., Thoursie, P. S., Vahtrik, L., 2008. Gender and self-selection into a competitive environment: Are women more overconfident than men?. Economics Letters, 100(3), 405-407. Neyse, L., Bosworth, S., Ring, P., Schmidt, U., 2016. Overconfidence, Incentives and Digit Ratio. Scientific Reports, 6 (1) Niederle, M., Vesterlund, L., 2007. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067-1101. Odean, T., 1999. Do Investors Trade Too Much? The American Economic Review, 89(5), 1279–1298. Raven, J.C., 1936. Mental tests used in genetic studies: the performances of related individuals in tests tainly educative and mainly reproductive. M.Sc. Thesis, University of London. Ring, P., Neyse, L., David-Barett, T., & Schmidt, U., 2016. Gender differences in performance predictions: evidence from the cognitive reflection test. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1680. Soll, J.B., Klayman, J., 2004. Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 299. Taylor, S.E., Kemeny, M.E., Reed, G.M., Bower, J.E., Gruenewald, T.L., 2000. Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. American Psychologist, 55(1), 99. Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Palma, M.A., 2019. Conveniently dependent or naively overconfident? An experimental study on the reaction to external help. PlOS One, 14(5), e0216617.