Government and growth

Colombier, Carsten (2004): Government and growth. Published in: Applied Economics , Vol. 41, No. 7 (2009): pp. 899-912.

Abstract

In contrast to most empirical growth studies, this study applies a robust estimator, which accounts for outliers, non-Gaussian distributions and a lack of quality in datasets like those for growth empirics. According to the empirical analysis, the relationship between government activities and economic growth is generally weak. Positive correlations with economic growth have been verified, however, for water and sewer systems and transport and communication infrastructures, as well as public research and development expenditures. The growth effects of transport and communication infrastructures in particular appear to be stable. Positive correlations have been identified for public educational expenses only at central government level. However, it must be stated that the relation between education and economic performance is complex. In contrast, no significant growth effects were found with respect to government revenues. As a consequence, the predictions of endogenous growth theory cannot be confirmed for the revenue side. Furthermore, no significant relation between government size and economic growth was confirmed. This suggests that the question of optimal government size is empirically not solvable. Thus, empirical analyses should be focused on the growth effects of single government activities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: new growth empirics, government expenditures, modified maximum likelihood estimator, government size, fiscal policy,growth
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General

References

Agell, J, Ohlsson, H. and P. Skogmann Thoursie (2003), “Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries: A comment”, Research Papers in Economics No. 2003:14, Department of Economics, Stockholm University.

Aschauer, D. (2001), “Output and employment effects of public capital”, Public Finance and Management, 1(2), 135-60.

Ávila, de D. R. and R. Strauch (2003),"Public finances and long-term growth in Europe – evidence from panel data analysis", Working Paper No. 246, European Central Bank.

Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-I-Martin (1995), “Economic Growth”, New York.

Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, St. and Ph. Hemmings (2001), “Economic Growth: The role of policies and institutions. Panel data evidence from OECD countries”, OECD-Economics Department Working Paper 283.

Bewley, T. F. (2003), “Labor market behavior”, paper presented at the Federal Reserve Boston Conference, “How Humans behave: the implications for economics and economic policy”, Chatham, Massachusetts, USA.

Bleaney, M., Gemmell, N. and R. Kneller (2001),”Testing the endogenous growth model: public expenditure, taxation, and growth over the long run”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(1), 36-57.

Bruchez, P. A. (2002), “Pourquoi l’économie Suisse a-t-elle stagné durant la première partie des années 90? – Revue de la literature”, Group of Economic Advisers, Swiss Federal Finance Administration.

Colombier, C. (2001), “Spezifikation einer Produktionsfunktion mit einem nichtrival nutzbaren Produktionsfaktor”, Berlin.

European Commission (2002), “Public Finances in EMU – 2002”, European Economy Reports and Studies, No. 3, Luxemburg.

Fölster, St. and M. Henrekson (2001), “Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries”, European Economic Review, 45(8), 1501-20.

Frenkel, M. and H.-R. Hemmer (1999), “Grundlagen der Wachstumstheorie”, München. Gemmell, N, and R. Kneller (2001), “The impact of fiscal policy on long-run growth”, European Economy – Reports and Studies: Current issues in economic growth, No.1, 97-129.

Gerson, Ph. (1998), “The impact of fiscal policy variables on output growth”, IMF Working Paper 98/1.

Hampel, F. (2001), “Robust statistics: a brief introduction and overview”, Research Report No. 94, Seminar for Statistics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ).

Hubert, M., Rousseeuw, P. J. and St. van Elst (2004), "Multivariate outlier detection and robustness", Handbook of Statistics, vol. 23: Data mining and computation in statistics, Elsevier, Holland, forthcoming.

Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. and N. Gemmell (1999), “Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries”, Journal of Public Economics, 74, 171-90.

Levine, R. and D. Renelt (1991), “Cross-country studies of growth and policy”, World Bank Working Paper WPS no. 608.

Levine, R. and D. Renelt (1992), “A sensitivity analysis to cross-country growth regressions”, American Economic Review, 82(4), 942-63.

Lucas, R.E. (1988), “On the mechanics of economic development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.

Myles, G. (2000), “Taxation and economic growth”, Fiscal Studies, 21(1), 141-168.

OECD (2001), Nicolletti, G. and P. Swaim, “Product and labour markets interactions in OECD countries”, Working Party No. 1 on Macroeconomics and Structural Policy Analysis, OECD.

Pack, H. (1994), “Endogenous growth theory: intellectual appeal and empirical shortcomings”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 55-72.

PISA, OECD (2003), “Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow – further results from PISA 2000”, Program for International Student Assessment (PISA).

Podrecca, E. (1993), “Recent growth theories: an assessment”, Rivista Internationale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 40(5), 411-422.

Pohlenz, F. L. (2000), “Educational attainment as a proxy for human capital in models of growth and development: A critical survey”, Bamberg.

Romer, P.M. (1986), “Increasing returns and long-run growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.

Romer, P.M. (1990), “Endogenous technological change”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, 71-102.

Roloff, O. (2001), “Der eigennützige Staat in der Konfliktgesellschaft”, Marburg.

Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997), “I just ran two million regressions”, American Economic Review, 87(2), 178-83.

Singh, R. J. and R. Weber (1997), “The composition of public expenditure and economic growth: Can anything be learned from Swiss data?”, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133(3), 617-634.

Solow, R. M. (1956), “A contribution to the theory of economic growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.

Strauss, T., (2001), “Growth and Government: Is there a difference between developed and developing countries?”, Economics of Governance, 2, 135-157.

Tanzi, V. and H. H. Zee (1997), Fiscal policy and long-run growth, IMF Staff Papers, 44(2), 179-207.

Temple, J. (1998), “Robustness test of the augmented Solow-model”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13, 361-375.

Temple, J. (1999), “The New Growth Evidence”, Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 112-156.

Thirlwall, A. P. (2003), “'Old' thoughts on 'new' growth theory”, in: N. Salvadori (ed.): Old and new growth theories – an assessment, Cheltenham, UK, 44-51.

Thöne, M. (2003), “Wachstums- und nachhaltigkeitswirksame öffentliche Ausgaben (“WNA”) – Möglichkeiten der konzeptionellen Abgrenzung und quantitativen Erfassung”, Gutachten zuhanden des Bundesministerim der Finanzen (D), 1. Fassung, Finanzwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut an der Universität Köln.

Zaman, A., Rousseeuw, P. J. and M. Orhan (2001), “Econometric applications of high-breakdown robust regression techniques”, Economics Letters, 71, 1-8.