Rent-Seeking Government and Endogenous Takeoff in a Schumpeterian Economy

Chu, Angus C. (2020): Rent-Seeking Government and Endogenous Takeoff in a Schumpeterian Economy.

Abstract

This study explores how the rent-seeking behavior of the government may impede economic development and delay industrialization. Introducing a rent-seeking government to the Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous takeoff, we find that a more self-interested government engages more in rent-seeking taxation, which delays the transition of the economy from pre-industrial stagnation to modern economic growth. Quantitatively, a completely self-interested government delays industrialization, relative to a benevolent government, by eight decades.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: rent-seeking government; endogenous takeoff; industrialization
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.

Allen, R., 2011. Global Economic History: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Ang, J., and Madsen, J., 2011. Can second-generation endogenous growth models explain the productivity trends and knowledge production in the Asian miracle economies?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 1360-1373.

Chu, A., 2010. Nation states vs. united empire: Effects of political competition on economic growth. Public Choice, 145, 181-195.

Chu, A., Fan, H., and Wang, X., 2020. Status-seeking culture and development of capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 180, 275-290.

Chu, A., Kou, Z., and Wang, X., 2020. Effects of patents on the transition from stagnation to growth. Journal of Population Economics, 33, 395-411.

Chu, A., Peretto, P., and Wang, X., 2020. Agricultural revolution and industrialization. MPRA Paper No. 101224.

DeLong, B., and Shleifer, A., 1993. Princes and merchants: European city growth before the industrial revolution. Journal of Law & Economics, 36, 671-702.

Dinopoulos, E., and Thompson, P., 1998. Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 313-335.

Galor, O., 2011. Unified Growth Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Galor, O., and Moav, O., 2002. Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1133-1192.

Galor, O., Moav, O., and Vollrath, D., 2009. Inequality in landownership, the emergence of human-capital promoting institutions, and the great divergence. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 143-179.

Galor, O., and Mountford, A., 2008. Trading population for productivity: Theory and evidence. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 1143-1179.

Galor, O., and Weil, D., 2000. Population, technology and growth: From the Malthusian regime to the demographic transition. American Economic Review, 110, 806-828.

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.

Ha, J., and Howitt, P., 2007. Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 33, 733-774.

Hansen, G., and Prescott, E., 2002. Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review, 92, 1205-1217.

Howitt, P., 1999. Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715-730.

Iacopetta, M., and Peretto, P., 2020. Corporate governance and industrialization. OFCE Working Paper No. 14/2020.

Jones, C., 2001. Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Advances), 1, 1-45.

Laincz, C., and Peretto, P., 2006. Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: An error of aggregation not specification. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 263-288.

Madsen, J., 2008. Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: Testing the knowledge production function using international data. Journal of Economic Growth, 13, 1-26.

Madsen, J., 2010. The anatomy of growth in the OECD since 1870. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57, 753-767.

Peretto, P., 1994. Essays on Market Structure and Economic Growth. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.

Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283-311.

Peretto, P., 1999. Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 173-195.

Peretto, P., 2007. Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 353-382.

Peretto, P., 2015. From Smith to Schumpeter: A theory of take-off and convergence to sustained growth. European Economic Review, 78, 1-26.

Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-91.

Smulders, S. and van de Klundert, T., 1995. Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R&D. European Economic Review, 39, 139-160.

Young, A., 1998. Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41-63.