Rouhani, Omid (2021): Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches- Version 2.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105729.pdf Download (183kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Building upon an earlier version, I further review the key methods to evaluate transportation projects. Since transportation projects offer substantial social benefits and costs, it is vital to provide a comparative analysis on the commonly-used methods, i.e., which method(s) to use and under what conditions. In this short paper, I provide such analysis briefly.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches- Version 2 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Project evaluation methods, Transport projects, Comparative analysis, Multi-criteria analysis, Social welfare analysis. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics |
Item ID: | 105729 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Omid. Rouhani |
Date Deposited: | 03 Feb 2021 03:49 |
Last Modified: | 03 Feb 2021 03:49 |
References: | Ackerman, F., and L. Heinzerling, 2004. On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. The New Press, New York, 2004. Arrow, K. J., & Lind, R. C., 1978. “Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions.” Uncertainty in Economics (pp. 403-421). Beheshtian, A. et al., 2017. "Planning resilient motor-fuel supply chain" International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 24 (2017): 312-325. Beheshtian, A. et al., 2020. Bringing the efficiency of electricity market mechanisms to multimodal mobility across congested transportation systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 58-69. Booth, P., & Schulz, A. K. D., 2004. “The impact of an ethical environment on managers' project evaluation judgments under agency problem conditions.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5-6), 473-488. Daher, N., et al., 2018. "Perceptions, Preferences, and Behavior Regarding Energy and Environmental Costs: The Case of Montreal Transport Users." Sustainability 10, 2 (2018): 514. Diewert, W. E., 1983. “Cost-benefit analysis and project evaluation: A comparison of alternative approaches.” Journal of Public Economics, 22(3), 265-302. Do, W., et al., 2019. “Simulation-based connected and automated vehicle models on highway sections: a literature review.” Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019. Do, W., et al., 2020. "A comprehensive welfare impact analysis for road expansion projects: A case study." Case Studies on Transport Policy 8(3), 1053-1061. Do, et al., 2021. "Social impact analysis of various road capacity expansion options: the case of managed highway lanes." Submitted to Journal of Transportation Engineering. Hickman, R., and M. Dean, 2018. “Incomplete cost–incomplete benefit analysis in transport appraisal.” Transport reviews, 2018. Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 689-709. Jones, H. L., Moura, F., & Domingos, T., 2018. “Transportation Infrastructure Project Evaluation: Transforming CBA to Include a Life Cycle Perspective.” In Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research (pp. 745-771). Springer, Cham. Lin, C. Y., et al., 2009. "The implications of an E10 ethanol-blend policy for California." California State Controller John Chiang Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements 5.5 (2009): 6-7. Litman, T., 2017. “Community cohesion as a transport planning objective.” Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Lord, D., Persaud, B. N., 2004. “Estimating the safety performance of urban road transportation networks.” Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(4), 609-620. Macharis, C., De Witte, A., & Ampe, J., 2009. “The multi‐actor, multi‐criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice.” Journal of Advanced transportation, 43(2), 183-202. Madani, K., et al., 2011. "Can We Rely on Renewable Energy Sources to Overcome Global Warming?." World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability, pp. 3319-3326. 2011. Madani, K., et al., 2014. "A negotiation support system for resolving an international trans-boundary natural resource conflict." Environmental modelling & software 51 (2014): 240-249. National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission (NSTIFC), 2009. “Paying Our Way: A New Framework for Transportation Finance”, February 2009, 108, https://financecommission.dot.gov/Documents/NSTIF_Commission_Final_Report_Mar09FNL.pdf (accessed February 5, 2017). Nocera, S., Tonin, S., & Cavallaro, F., 2015. “The economic impact of greenhouse gas abatement through a meta-analysis: Valuation, consequences and implications in terms of transport policy.” Transport Policy, 37, 31-43. Poorzahedy, H., & Rouhani, O. M., 2007. “Hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for solving network design problem.” European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 578-596. Policy EU Guide, 2008. “Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects.” The EU. https://ec.europa.eu/inea/sites/inea/files/cba_guide_cohesion_policy.pdf (accessed February 5, 2017). Pohl, G., & Mihaljek, D., 1992. “Project evaluation and uncertainty in practice: A statistical analysis of rate-of-return divergences of 1,015 World Bank projects.” The World Bank Economic Review, 6(2), 255-277. Rouhani, O.M., 2012. Frameworks for public-private partnerships. University of California, Davis, 2012. Rouhani, O.M., 2013. "Clean development mechanism: an appropriate approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation." Transportation Research Board 92 (2013). Rouhani, O.M., 2016. "Next Generations of Road Pricing: Social Welfare Enhancing." Sustainability 8.3 (2016): 1-15. Rouhani, O.M., 2018a. "Beyond Standard Zonal Congestion Pricing: A Detailed Impact Analysis." Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 144, 9 (2018): 04018052. Rouhani, O.M., 2018b, "Financing Sustainability and Resiliency of Transportation Infrastructure in an Era of Fiscal Constraint." MPRA Paper No. 88504. Rouhani, O.M., 2019. Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches. MPRA Paper No. 91451, January 2019. Rouhani, O.M., and A. Beheshtian, 2013. “Social and Private Costs of Driving.” Lecture presentation at the 2013 Annual Conference of the International Transportation Economics Association, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Rouhani, O.M., and A. Beheshtian. 2016. "Energy Management." Book chapter in Multi Vol. Set on Energy Science and Technology. Rouhani, O.M., and H.O. Gao, 2014. “An Advanced Traveler General Information System for Fresno, CA”, Transportation Research Part A, 67: 254-267. Rouhani, O.M., and H. O. Gao, 2016. "Evaluating various road ownership structures and potential competition on an urban road network." Networks and Spatial Economics 16.4 (2016): 1019-1042. Rouhani, O. M., and D. Niemeier, 2011. “Urban Network Privatization: Example of a Small Network.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2221), 46-56. Rouhani, O.M., and D. Niemeier, 2014a. “Resolving the Property Right of Transportation Emissions through Public-Private Partnerships.” Transportation Research Part D, 31: 48-60. Rouhani, O.M., and D. Niemeier, 2014b. “Flat versus Spatially Variable Tolling: A Case Study in Fresno, California.” Journal of Transport Geography, 37, 10-18. Rouhani, O.M., and H. Zarei, 2014. “Fuel Consumption Information: An Alternative for Congestion Pricing?” Road and Transport Research, 23(3), 52-64. Rouhani, O.M. et al., 2013a. “Integrated modeling framework for leasing urban roads: A case study of Fresno, California.” Transportation Research Part B, 48 (1): 17-30.1 Rouhani, O. M., et al., 2013b. "The Renewable Portfolio Standard’s Impacts on the California’s Electricity Sector." International Journal of Power and Energy Systems 33 (3), 130-134. Rouhani, O.M. et al., 2014. "Road supply in central London: Addition of an ignored social cost." Journal of the Transportation Research Forum. Vol. 53. No. 1. Transportation Research Forum, 2014. Rouhani, O.M., et al., 2015a. "Policy lessons for regulating public–private partnership tolling schemes in urban environments." Transport Policy 41 (2015): 68-79. Rouhani, O.M., et al., 2015b. “Implications of fuel and emissions externalities, spillovers to the outside, and temporal variations on zonal congestion pricing schemes.” TRB paper No. 15-0905. 2015. Rouhani, O.M., et al., 2016a. "Social welfare analysis of investment public–private partnership approaches for transportation projects." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 88 (2016): 86-103. Rouhani, O.M., et al., 2016b. "Cost-benefit analysis of various California renewable portfolio standard targets: Is a 33% RPS optimal?" Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62 (2016): 1122-1132. Rouhani, O.M., et al., 2018. "Revenue-Risk-Sharing Approaches for Public-Private Partnership Provision of Highway Facilities." Case Studies on Transport Policy , in press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.04.003. Rouhani, O.M., et al., 2021 “Weighing Criteria to Evaluate Projects: A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Analysis and Social-Welfare Analysis” Working paper. Saaty, T. L., Shang, J. S., 2011. “An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts.” European Journal of Operational Research, 214(3), 703-715. Tudela, A., N. Akiki, and R. Cisternas, 2006. Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: An application to urban transport investments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006. Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 414-423. Weisbrod, G., & Weisbrod, B., 1997. “Assessing the economic impact of transportation projects: How to choose the appropriate technique for your project.” Transportation Research Circular, (477). Van Wee, B. (2012). “How suitable is CBA for the ex-ante evaluation of transport projects and policies? A discussion from the perspective of ethics.” Transport Policy, 19(1), 1-7. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105729 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches- Version 2. (deposited 03 Feb 2021 03:49) [Currently Displayed]