Berulava, George and Gogokhia, Teimuraz (2021): The Impact of Business Environment Reforms on Firms’ Performance in Transition Economies.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106327.pdf Download (274kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The study investigates the impact of business environment on export performance of individual firms in transition economies. For these goals, the study utilizes the firm-level data from the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS V round) across 28 transition economies. Applying the modified CDM model the paper examines the structural link between the business environment reforms, firm R&D, innovation, labor productivity, and export performance. The model was estimated sequentially, step-by-step. The estimates of the structural model, generally, proved our hypothesis about the impact of business environment reforms on the relationships between R&D investments, innovation, labor productivity and export performance. This study also supports the early findings that R&D is an important determinant of innovation, that innovation is a driver of labor productivity and that labor productivity, in turn, substantially increases the probability of firm’s participation at export markets.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Impact of Business Environment Reforms on Firms’ Performance in Transition Economies |
English Title: | The Impact of Business Environment Reforms on Firms’ Performance in Transition Economies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Business environment reforms, R&D, Innovation, Productivity, Export, Transition economies |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P31 - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions |
Item ID: | 106327 |
Depositing User: | Mr. George Berulava |
Date Deposited: | 05 Mar 2021 03:40 |
Last Modified: | 05 Mar 2021 03:40 |
References: | 1. Antonietti, Roberto and Giulio Cainelli (2011). “The Role of Spatial Agglomeration in a Structural Model of Innovation, Productivity and Export: A Firm-Level Analysis,” Annual Regional Science, vol. 46, pp. 577–600. 2. Arnold, J. M., Mattoo, A. & Narciso, G. (2008). Services inputs and firm productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from firm-level data. Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), 17(4), 578-599. 3. Arnold, J.M., Javorcik, B. and Mattoo, A. (2011) Does services liberalization benefit manufacturing firms: evidence from the Czech Republic, Journal of International Economics Vol. 85 (1), 136-146. 4. Bernard, A. B. and J. B. Jensen (1999). “Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?” Journal of International Economics, 47, 1, pp. 1–25. 5. Bernard, A. B. and J. Wagner (1997). “Exports and Success in German Manufacturing.” Review of World Economics, 133, 1, pp.134–57. 6. Berulava G. (2011) “Services Inputs and Export Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Transition Economies”, EERC Working paper Series №11/17e, 23 p. 7. Berulava G. (2012) “The Impact of Services Sector on Export Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Transition Economies,” Moambe, Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences, vol.6, n.3, pp. 154-162 8. Berulava, G., & Gogokhia, T. (2016). On the role of in-house R&D and external knowledge acquisition in firm’s choice for innovation strategy: Evidence from transition economies. Moambe, Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences,10 (3), 150-158. 9. Berulava, G., & Gogokhia, T. (2018). “Complementarities of Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Transition Economies.” In: Bilgin M., Danis H., Demir E., Can U. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 8/2. Springer, Cham, 169-192, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67916-7_11 10. Carlin, W., & Seabright, P. (2009). Bring me sunshine: Which parts of the business climate should public policy try to fix? in Proceedings of the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics 2008, Washington D.C.: World Bank, 2009. 11. Clarke, George R. G. (2005). “Beyond Tariff and Quotas: Why Don’t African Manufacturing Enterprises Export More?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. WPS3617. 12. Crepon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115-158. 13. Disoska Elena Makrevska, Dragan Tevdovski, Katerina Toshevska-Trpchevska & Viktor Stojkoski (2018) Evidence of innovation performance in the period of economic recovery in Europe, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1524288 14. Dollar, D., Hallward‐Driemeier, M., & Mengistae, T. (2005). Investment Climate and Firm Performance in Developing Economies. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/431262 15. EBRD (2014). EBRD Transition report 2014: Innovation in transition. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Available at: http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/transition/tr14.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2019. 16. Escribano, A. and Guasch, J.L. (2005). “Assessing the Impact of the Investment Climate on Productivity Using Firm-Level Data: Methodology and the Cases of Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3621, June 2005. 17. Fernandes A. M and C. Paunov, (2008) “Foreign Direct Investment in Services and Manufacturing Productivity Growth: Evidence for Chile.” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 4730. 18. Friesenbichler, K., & Peneder, M. R. (2016). Innovation, competition and productivity: Firm-level evidence for Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Economics of Transition, 24 (3), 535-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12100 19. Gogokhia T. and G. Berulava (2020) “Business environment reforms, innovation and firm productivity in transition economies.” Eurasian Business Review , Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00167-5 20. Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483-498. 21. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116. 22. Hall, B., & Mairesse, J. (2006). Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge driven economy: An introduction. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15 (4/5), 289-299. 23. Iwanow, T., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2008). Trade facilitation and manufactured exports: Is Africa different? World Development, 37( 6),1039-50. 24. Loof, H., Heshmati, A., Apslund, R., & Naas, S-O. (2003). Innovation and performance in manufacturing industries: A comparison of the Nordic countries. International Journal of Management Research, 2, 5-36. 25. Mairesse, J., & Robin, S. (2009). Innovation and productivity: A firm-level analysis for French Manufacturing and Services (1998-2000 and 2002-2004). Mimeo, CREST-ENSAE, Paris. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.462.3919&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019. 26. Masso, J., & Vahter, P. (2012). The link between innovation and productivity in Estonia’s services sector. The Service Industries Journal, 32(16), 2527–2541. 27. Melitz, M.J., (2003). “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity,” Econometrica, 71, pp. 1695-1725. 28. Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1980). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report", Economics Letter, 5, 377-381. 29. Plane, P., & Véganzonès-Varoudakis, M.-A. (2019). Innovation, productivity, exports and the investment climate: A study based on Indian manufacturing firm-level data. Applied Economics, 51 (41), 4445-4476, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1591606 30. Rialp-Criado, A., & Komochkova, K. (2017). Innovation strategy and export intensity of Chinese SMEs: the moderating role of the home-country business environment. Asian Business & Management, 16(3), 158–186, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-017-0018-2 31. Toshevska-Trpchevska, K., Disoska, E., Tevdovski, D., & Stojkoski, V. (2019). The Impact of a Crisis on the Innovation Systems in Europe: Evidence from the CIS10 Innovation Survey. European Review, 27(4), 543-562. doi:10.1017/S1062798719000218 32. Véganzonès-Varoudakis, M. A., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2018). Investment climate, outward orientation and manufacturing firm productivity: New empirical evidence. Applied Economics, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1488065 33. Wagner Joachim (2007). “Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm-level Data.” The World Economy, pp.60-83. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106327 |