Summers, Michael and George, Verikios (2016): Assistive Technology Pricingin Australia: Is It Efficient and Equitable? Published in: Australian Health Review , Vol. 42, (2018): pp. 100-110.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106500.pdf Download (697kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Recently, concerns have been raised that in comparison to prices for assistive technology (AT) (e.g., disability aids and equipment)in other countries, Australian AT retailers’ prices are excessive. We present three sets of price comparisons for AT that indicate Australian prices arelow comparedto other countries. Further, there is no evidence of suppliers earning supranormal profits in Australia. Together, all the evidence suggests that AT prices in Australia are efficient and equitable. Efforts to reduce prices through the excessive use of large-scale government procurement programs are likely to reduce diversity and innovation in AT and raise AT prices over time.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Assistive Technology Pricingin Australia: Is It Efficient and Equitable? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | assistive technology; efficiency; equity; government procurement |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I11 - Analysis of Health Care Markets I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I14 - Health and Inequality I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health |
Item ID: | 106500 |
Depositing User: | Dr George Verikios |
Date Deposited: | 12 Mar 2021 21:34 |
Last Modified: | 12 Mar 2021 21:34 |
References: | [1]. World Health Organization, (2004), A Glossary of Terms for Community Health Care and Services for Older Persons, Centre for Health Development, Ageing and Health Technical Report Volume 5, Geneva. [2]. Wells, R. (2013), ‘Disabled say equipment providers 'profiteering’’, The Sydney Morning Herald, http://www.smh.com.au/national/disabled-say-equipment-providers-profiteering-20120608-201db.html, viewed 20/11/2014. [3]. Wordsworth, M. (2011), ‘Parents angry over disability product price gouging’, ABC News, http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-07-16/companies-disabled-price-rises/2797208, viewed 20/11/2014. [4]. National Disability Insurance Agency, (2014), Towards Solutions for Assistive Technology, NDIA, Canberra. [5]. Australian Bureau of Statistics, (2004), Disability, Ageing and Carers: Summary of Findings, Cat. No. 4430.0, ABS, Canberra. [6]. IBISWorld (2012), Mobility Equipment Stores in Australia, IBISWorld Industry Report OD4159, Melbourne. [7]. Assistive Technology Suppliers Australasia, (2014), 'Assistive technology pricing: Is it fair and reasonable?', Background Paper, ATSA, Parramatta, NSW. [8]. Sprigle, S. and De l’aune, W. (2012), ‘Factors contributing to extended activity times during the provision of wheeled mobility devices’, Disabil Rehabil: Assis Tech, vol. 8, issue 3, pp. 225–31. [9]. Sprigle, S., Lenker, J. and Searcy, K. (2012), ‘Activities of suppliers and technicians during the provision of complex and standard wheeled mobility devices’, Disabil Rehabil: Assis Tech, vol. 7, issue 3, pp. 219–225. [10]. Summers, M. and Walker, L. (2013), National Credentialing and Accreditation for Assistive Technology Practitioners and Suppliers: An Options Paper, Assistive Technology Suppliers Australasia, Parramatta. [11]. Productivity Commission (2011), Economic Structure and Performance of the Australian Retail Industry, Report Number 56, Canberra. [12]. Queensland Competition Authority, (2014), Price Disparities for Disability Aids and Equipment: Final Report, QCA, Brisbane. [13]. Jenny Pearson & Associates, (2013), Research for the National Disability Agreement: Aids and Equipment Reform, Final Report, commissioned by the Disability Policy and Research Working Group, FaHCSIA, Canberra. [14]. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, (2014), Australia’s Health 2014, Australia’s health series no. 14., Cat. no. AUS 178, AIHW, Canberra. [15]. Baumol, W.J. (1993), 'Social wants and dismal science: The curious case of the climbing costs of health and teaching', Economic Research Report no. 93-20, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University, May. [16]. Assistive Technology Suppliers Australasia, (2013), Submission to the Queensland Competition Authority’s Medical and Disability Aids and Equipment Pricing Investigation, ATSA, Parramatta, NSW. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106500 |