The impact of state capacity on the cross-country variations in COVID-19 vaccination rates

Tevdovski, Dragan and Jolakoski, Petar and Stojkoski, Viktor (2021): The impact of state capacity on the cross-country variations in COVID-19 vaccination rates.

Abstract

The initial period of vaccination shows strong heterogeneity between countries’ vaccinations rollout, both in the terms of the start of the vaccination process and in the dynamics of the number of people that are vaccinated. A predominant thesis in the ongoing debate on the drivers of this observed heterogeneity is that a key determinant of the swift and extensive vaccine rollout is state capacity. Here, we utilize two measures that quantify different aspects of the state capacity: i) the external capacity (measured through the soft power and the economic power of the country) and ii) the internal capacity (measured via the country’s government effectiveness) and investigate their relationship with the coronavirus vaccination outcome in the initial period (up to 30th January 2021). By using data on 189 countries and a two-step Heckman approach, we find that the economic power of the country and its soft power are robust determinants of whether a country has started with the vaccination process. In addition, the government effectiveness is a key factor that determines vaccine roll-out. Altogether, our findings are in line with the hypothesis that state capacity determines the observed heterogeneity between countries in the initial period of COVID-19 vaccines rollout.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: state capacity, COVID-19, Heckman selection
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C54 - Quantitative Policy Modeling; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F63 - Economic Development

References

Acemoglu, D., García-Jimeno, C. and Robinson, J.A., 2015. State capacity and economic development: A network approach. American Economic Review, 105(8), pp.2364-2409.

Besley, T. and Persson, T., 2010. State capacity, conflict, and development. Econometrica, 78(1), pp.1-34.

Cingolani, L., 2018. The role of state capacity in development studies. Journal of Development Perspectives, 2(1-2), pp.88-114.

Cingolani, L., Thomsson, K. and De Crombrugghe, D., 2015. Minding Weber more than ever? The impacts of state capacity and bureaucratic autonomy on development goals. World Development, 72, pp.191-207.

Hanson, J.K. and Sigman, R., 2013, September. Leviathan's latent dimensions: measuring state capacity for comparative political research. In APSA 2011 Annual meeting paper.

Heckman, J., 1974. Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica: journal of the econometric society, pp.679-694.

Kacziba, P., 2020. Political Sources of Hungarian Soft Power. Politics in Central Europe, 16(s1), pp.81-111.

Khemani, S., 2019. What Is State Capacity?. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper,(8734).

Lee, S.Y. and Whitford, A.B., 2009. Government effectiveness in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(2), pp.249-281.

LAI, H., 2019. Soft Power Determinants in the World and Implications for China. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 37(1), pp.8-35.

Nye Jr, J.S., 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public affairs.

Nye, J.S., 2011. The future of power. Public Affairs.

Rutland, P. and Kazantsev, A., 2016. The limits of Russia’s ‘soft power’. Journal of Political Power, 9(3), pp.395-413.

Stojkoski, V., Utkovski, Z., Jolakoski, P., Tevdovski, D. and Kocarev, L., 2020. The socioeconomic determinants of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07947.

Williams, M.J., 2018. Beyond state capacity: bureaucratic performance, policy implementation and reform. Journal of Institutional Economics, pp.1-19.

Winship, C. and Mare, R.D., 1992. Models for sample selection bias. Annual review of sociology, 18(1), pp.327-350.