ANDREI, Dalina (2021): Objectives and difficulties in SME’s sector in Romania.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106619.pdf Download (336kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The topic of this paper keeps deep roots in the old economic thinking and will share between such basics and update data for Romania. On the one hand, the Marginalist ‘perfect competition model’ daring to link between ‘welfare maximizing’ and what ever-since regards ‘small and medium size enterprises’(SME), and that basing on a real and simple mathematical demonstration of that time. On the other, the latter and today condition in a country like Romania in early 21st century, namely in a time of all compatibility dismantled between economic development and just SME here working. We’ll also see below that SME cannot be missing, together with activities and their aspects that appear even surprising at the first sight. All facts and data here develop during the two years previous to the current pandemic (2018-2019). Data, including some analyses made, here come from National Institute of Statistics (INSEE), National Council for SME, both in Romania, plus the European Commission(EC) Manual. To equally be noted that these same data and analyses will make the basis for future research considering current health crisis and its impact on the Romania’s business environment.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Objectives and difficulties in SME’s sector in Romania |
English Title: | Objectives and difficulties in SME’s sector in Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Small and Medium Size Enterprises (SME), Marginalism, Perfect Competition Model |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M0 - General > M00 - General M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development |
Item ID: | 106619 |
Depositing User: | Ph.D Dalina Andrei |
Date Deposited: | 15 Mar 2021 07:15 |
Last Modified: | 15 Mar 2021 07:15 |
References: | 1.Andrei, Liviu C (2019): Economie. Editura Economica, Third Edition. Bucharest, p. 66 2.Alexander W. Bartik, Marianne Bertrand, Zoe Cullen, Edward L. Glaeser, Michael Luca, Christopher Stanton (2020) The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America, July 2020, 117 (30) 17656-17666; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006991117 3.Andreas Kuckertz, Leif Brändle, Anja Gaudig, Sebastian Hinderer, Carlos Arturo Morales Reyes, Alicia Prochotta, Kathrin M. Steinbrink, Elisabeth S.C. Berger,Startups in times of crisis (2020) – A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Volume13,ISSN 2352-6734, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169. 4.Bacq, S., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2020), Social Entrepreneurship and COVID‐19. Journal of Management Studies, 10.1111/joms.12641. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12641 5.Bartik, AW, Bertrand, M, Cullen, ZB, et al. (2020), How Are Small Businesses Adjusting to COVID-19? Early Evidence from a Survey (No. w26989). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research 6.European Comission (2018). Întreprinderi şi industrie Retrieved from https:// cursdeguvernare.ro https://ec.europa.eu/info/topics/business-and-industry_ro.) 7.Fabeil, Noor Fzlinda and Pazim, Khairul Hanim and Langgat, Juliana, (2020),The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis on Micro-Enterprises: Entrepreneurs’ Perspective on Business Continuity and Recovery Strategy , Journal of Economics and Business, Vol.3 No.2 (2020) 8.Ferran Giones, Alexander Brem, Jeffrey M. Pollack, Timothy L. Michaelis, Kim Klyver, Jan Brinckmann,(2020) , Revising entrepreneurial action in response to exogenous shocks: Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Business Venturing Insights,Volume 14, 2020, ISSN 2352-6734, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00186. 9.Judit Kapás(2008), Industrial revolutions and the evolution of the firm's organization: an historical perspective, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management , vol 2,pag 15 - 33 10.Ionescu, A.(2018). Studiu: Investiţiile companiilor româneşti sunt riscante şi cu efect multiplicator redus în economie. Şansa e la companiile mijlocii / Study: The investments of Romanian companies are risky and with a reduced multiplier effect in the economy. The chance is with medium-sized companies, Retrieved from https:// cursdeguvernare.ro 11.Keynes, J.M., (1936), Théorie de l'Emploi, du Credit et de la Monnaie, Paris 12.Michael Dietrich and Jackie Krafft, (2005) - The Firm in Economics and History: Towards an Historically Relevant Economics of the Firm , University of Sheffield ,U.K 13.Newman, Peter & Friedman, Milton. (1954). Essays in Positive Economics, Economica. 21. 259. 10.2307/2551326. 14.Rachel Doern, Nick Williams & Tim Vorley (2019), Special issue on entrepreneurship and crises: business as usual? An introduction and review of the literature,Entrepreneurship&RegionalDevelopment,31:5-6,400-412, 15.DOI : 10.1080/08985626.2018.1541590 16.White Paper on SMEs in Romania (2019). (17th ed.) / Carta albă a IMM-urilor din România (2019). Raport de cercetare XVII. , Ceccar business magazine, 28-29 ISSN 2601-8985 , ISSN-L 2601-8985 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106619 |