Exploring the Impact of Trading Green Products on the Environment: Introducing the Green Openness Index

Can, Muhlis and Ben Jebli, Mehdi and Brusselaers, Jan (2021): Exploring the Impact of Trading Green Products on the Environment: Introducing the Green Openness Index.

Abstract

Environmental degradation has constantly increased over the years, and has become one of the main contributors to climate change. For this reason, researchers are increasingly on the lookout for parameters that positively impact environmental quality. Green Products are widely accepted as one of the vital tools to minimize the environmental degradation. This paper introduces a new index which is called the Green Openness Index. The index represents the importance of Green Products in a region by means of a measure of trade in Green Products. This new index revisits the trade-environment nexus in a case study of 31 Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries over the period 2007-2017. The empirical findings provide evidence that Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis is valid, by means of Fully modified and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares regression analysis. As such, the new index also opens up a wide span of opportunities for future research, as the index can be used as explanatory variable in numerous different research questions and fields of research. Additionally, the results demonstrate that the presence of Green Products in trade reduces a country’s ecological footprint. This is essential information for practitioners and policy makers involved in the design of sustainable development policies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Green Openness Index, Green Products, Environmental Friendly Products,Environmental degradation
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

AL-MULALI, U., WENG-WAI, C., SHEAU-TING, L. & MOHAMMED, A. H. 2015. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315-323. ALI, W., ABDULLAH, A. & AZAM, M. 2016. The dynamic linkage between technological innovation and carbon dioxide emissions in Malaysia: an autoregressive distributed lagged bound approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6, 389-400. APEC 2012. Annec C - APEC List of environmental goods. In: APEC (ed.). APERGIS, N., CAN, M., GOZGOR, G. & LAU, C. K. M. 2018. Effects of export concentration on CO 2 emissions in developed countries: an empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 14106-14116. CAN, M. & DOĞAN, B. 2017. The effects of economic structural transformation on employment: an evaluation in the context of economic complexity and product space theory. Handbook of research on unemployment and labor market sustainability in the era of globalization. IGI Global. DEMIR, C., CERGIBOZAN, R. & ARI, A. 2020. Environmental dimension of innovation: time series evidence from Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 2497-2516. DU, K., LI, P. & YAN, Z. 2019. Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 297-303. GAO, X. & ZHENG, H. 2017. Environmental concerns, environmental policy and green investment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1570. GLOBAL FOOTPRINT NETWORK 2021. Ecological Footprint of Countries. GROSSMAN, G. M. & KRUEGER, A. B. 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of economic research. HAO, L.-N., UMAR, M., KHAN, Z. & ALI, W. 2021. Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Science of The Total Environment, 752, 141853. HE, J. 2009. China's industrial SO 2 emissions and its economic determinants: EKC's reduced vs. structural model and the role of international trade. Environment and Development Economics, 14, 227-262. HU, G., CAN, M., PARAMATI, S. R., DOĞAN, B. & FANG, J. 2020. The effect of import product diversification on carbon emissions: New evidence for sustainable economic policies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, 198-210. IBRAHIEM, D. M. 2020. Do technological innovations and financial development improve environmental quality in Egypt? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13. IEA 2013. World Energy Outlook Special Report 2013: Redrawing the Energy-Climate Map. IEA: Paris, France. KAO, C. 1999. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of econometrics, 90, 1-44. LING GUO, L., QU, Y. & TSENG, M.-L. 2017. The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. Journal of cleaner production, 162, 894-902. LOISEAU, E., SAIKKU, L., ANTIKAINEN, R., DROSTE, N., HANSJÜRGENS, B., PITKÄNEN, K., LESKINEN, P., KUIKMAN, P. & THOMSEN, M. 2016. Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of cleaner production, 139, 361-371. MARDANI, A., STREIMIKIENE, D., CAVALLARO, F., LOGANATHAN, N. & KHOSHNOUDI, M. 2019. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: A systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017. Science of the total environment, 649, 31-49. PARAMATI, S. R., MO, D. & HUANG, R. 2020. The role of financial deepening and green technology on carbon emissions: evidence from major OECD economies. Finance Research Letters, 101794. PEDRONI, P. 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 597-625. PESARAN, H. 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 435. PESARAN, M. H. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22, 265-312. SAUVAGE, J. 2014. The stringency of environmental regulations and trade in environmental goods. WANG, C. & LU, Y. 2020. Can economic structural change and transition explain cross-country differences in innovative activity? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120194. WANG, L., SU, C.-W., ALI, S. & CHANG, H.-L. 2020. How China is fostering sustainable growth: the interplay of green investment and production-based emission. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39607-39618. WORLD BANK 2021. World Development Indicators. In: BANK, T. W. (ed.). WTO 2009. Communication under paragraph 31 (III) of the Doha Ministerial Declaration. In: ORGANIZATION, W. T. (ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Committee on Trade and Environment Special Session - World Trade Organization. YII, K.-J. & GEETHA, C. 2017. The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: evidence from granger causality test. Energy Procedia, 105, 3118-3124. ZHANG, B., WANG, B. & WANG, Z. 2017. Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 855-864.