Nieddu, Marcello and Bertani, Filippo and Ponta, Linda (2021): Sustainability transition and digital trasformation: an agent-based perspective.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106943.pdf Download (294kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Digital transformation and sustainability transition are complex phenomena characterized by fun-damental uncertainty. The potential consequences deriving from these processes are the subject of open de-bates among economists and technologists. In this respect, adopting a modelling and simulation approachrepresents one of the best solution in order to forecast potential effects linked to these complex phenom-ena. Agent-based modelling represents an appropriate paradigm to address complexity. This research aimsat showing the potential of the large-scale macroeconomic agent-based model Eurace in order to investigatechallenges like sustainability transition and digital transformation. This paper discusses and compares resultsof previous works where the Eurace model was used to study the digital transformation, while it presents newresults concerning the framework on the sustainability transition, where a climate agent is introduced to ac-count the climate economy interaction. As regards the digital transformation, the Eurace model is able to cap-ture interesting business dynamics characterizing the so-called increasing returns world and, in case of highrates of digital technological progress, it shows a significant technological unemployment. As regard the sus-tainability transition, it displays a rebound effect on energy savings that compromises efforts to reduce greenhouse gases emissions via electricity efficiency improvements. Furthermore, it shows that a carbon tax couldbe not sufficient to decouple economy from carbon consumption, and that a feed-in tariff policy fosteringrenewable energy production growth may be more effective.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Sustainability transition and digital trasformation: an agent-based perspective |
English Title: | Sustainability transition and digital trasformation: an agent-based perspective |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Sustainability; Climate change mitigation policies; Digital Transformation; Technologicalunemployment; Agent-Based Modelling |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming |
Item ID: | 106943 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Filippo Bertani |
Date Deposited: | 03 Apr 2021 07:41 |
Last Modified: | 03 Apr 2021 07:41 |
References: | United nation environment program (2019). Emissions gap report 2019 Acemoglu D (2003) Labor - and Capital- Augmenting Technical Change. Journal of the European EconomicAssociation 1:1–37 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2017) Robots and jobs: Evidence from us labor markets. Working Paper 23285, National Bureau of Economic Research Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018a) Artificial intelligence, automation and work. Working Paper 24196, NationalBureau of Economic Research Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018b) Automation and new tasks: The implications of the task content of productionfor labor demand. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(2):3–30 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018c) Low-skill and high-skill automation. Journal of Human Capital 12(2):204–232 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018d) Modeling automation. AEA Papers and Proceedings 108:48–53 Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. American economic review 102(1):131–66 Aghion P, Jones BF, Jones CI (2017) Artificial intelligence and economic growth. Working Paper 23928, National Bureau of Economic Research Paris agreement (2015). In: Report of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (21st Session, 2015: Paris). Retrived December, HeinOnline, vol 4, p2017 Arrow KJ, Chenery HB, Minhas BS, Solow RM (1961) Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency. TheReview of Economics and Statistics 43:225–250 Arrow KJ, Cline WR, Maler KG, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz JE (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting,and economic efficiency. Cambridge, UK, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press Arthur WB (1996) Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard business review 74(4):100–109 Arthur WB (2006) Out-of-Equilibrium Economics and Agent-Based Modeling, Handbook of ComputationalEconomics, vol 2, Elsevier, pp 1551 – 1564 Arthur WB (2010) Complexity, the santa fe approach, and non-equilibrium economics. History of EconomicIdeas 18:149–166 Arthur WB (2013) Complexity economics. Complexity and the EconomyBelleflamme P, Peitz M (2018) Platforms and network effects. In: Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization: Applications, vol 2, pp 286–317 Bertani F, Ponta L, Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2020a) The complexity of the intangible digital economy: an agent-based model. Journal of Business Research Bertani F, Raberto M, Teglio A (2020b) The productivity and unemployment effects of the digital transformation: an empirical and modelling assessment. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy Bertani F, Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2021) Digital innovation and its potential consequences: the elasticity augmenting approach. Mpra paper 105326, University Library of Munich, Germany Bessen JE (2016) How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills. Law & Economics Working Paper No. 15-49, Boston University School of Law Bessen JE (2018) AI and Jobs: The Role of Demand. Working Paper 24235, National Bureau of Economic Research Bessen JE (2019) Automation and Jobs: When Technology Boosts Employment. Law & Economics WorkingPaper No. 17-09, Boston University School of Law Borrill PL, Tesfatsion L (2011) Agent-based modeling: the right mathematics for the social sciences? In: The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology, Edward Elgar Publishing Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Co Inc Carney M (2015) Breaking the tragedy of the horizon–climate change and financial stability. Speech given at Lloyd’s of London 29:220–230 Carroll CD (2001) A theory of the consumption function, with and without liquidity constraints. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(3):23–45 Castro J, Drews S, Exadaktylos F, Foramitti J, Klein F, Konc T, Savin I, van den Bergh J (2020) A review of agent-based modeling of climate-energy policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11(4):e647 Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A (2010) Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator eurace. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 4 Couture T, Gagnon Y (2010) An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy policy 38(2):955–965 DeCanio SJ (2016) Robots and humans – complements or substitutes? Journal of Macroeconomics 49:280–291 Edquist C, Hommen L, McKelvey M (2001) Innovation and Employment: Process versus Product Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing LImited Epstein JM (2006) Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling, vol 13. Princeton University Press Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Chapter 31: Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects. In: Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol 3, pp 1967–2072 Galán JM, Izquierdo LR, Izquierdo SS, Santos JI, Del Olmo R, López-Paredes A, Edmonds B (2009) Errors and artefacts in agent-based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1):1 Gallegati M (2018) Complex agent-based models. New Economic Windows, Springer Gerst MD, Wang P, Roventini A, Fagiolo G, Dosi G, Howarth RB, Borsuk ME (2013) Agent-based modeling of climate policy: An introduction to the engage multi-level model framework. Environmental modelling&software 44:62–75 Godley W, Lavoie M (2012) Monetary economics: An integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth. Palgrave Macmillan UK Good IJ (1966) Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. Advances in Computers 6:31–88 Gottinger HW (1998) Greenhouse gas economics and computable general equilibrium. Journal of policy modeling 20(5):537–580 Graetz G, Michaels G (2018) Robots at work. Review of Economics and Statistics 100:753–768 Hanson R (2001) Economic growth given machine intelligence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research - JAIR Haskel J, Westlake S (2017) Capitalism without Capital. Princeton University Press Hommes C, LeBaron B (2018) Computational Economics: Heterogeneous Agent Modeling. North Holland Hope C (2006) The marginal impact of co2 from page 2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating the ipcc’s five reasons for concern. Integrated assessment 6(1) IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,URLhttps://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf Jonson E, Azar C, Lindgren K, Lundberg L (2020) Exploring the competition between variable renewable electricity and a carbon-neutral baseload technology. ENERGY SYSTEMS-OPTIMIZATION MODELING SIMU-LATION AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS 11(1):21–44 Krogstrup S, Oman W (2019) Macroeconomic and financial policies for climate change mitigation: a review of the literature. International Monetary Fund de La Grandville O (1989) In Quest of the Slutsky Diamond. American Economic Review 79(3):468–481 de La Grandville O (1997) Curvature and the elasticity of substitution: Straightening it out. Journal of Economics 66(1):23–34 Lamperti F, Dosi G, Napoletano M, Roventini A, Sapio A, et al. (2018) And then he wasn’t a she: Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based model integrated assessment model. Tech. rep., Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE) Lamperti F, Bosetti V, Roventini A, Tavoni M, Treibich T, et al. (2021) Three green financial policies to address climate risks. Tech. rep., Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Lamperti F, Dosi G, Napoletano M, Roventini A, Sapio A (2020) Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Lankisch C, Prettner K, Prskawetz A (2019) How can robots affect wage inequality? Economic Modelling 81:161–169 Lenton TM, Rockström J, Gaffney O, Rahmstorf S, Richardson K, Steffen W, Schellnhuber HJ (2019) Climate tipping points—too risky to bet against Liang QM, Wei YM (2012) Distributional impacts of taxing carbon in china: results from the ceepa model. Applied Energy 92:545–551 Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B (2012) Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research policy 41(6):955–967 Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Pearson College Div Mokyr J, Vickers C, Ziebarth NL (2015) The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth:Is this time different? Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(3):31–50 Monasterolo I, Raberto M (2016) A hybrid system dynamics–agent based model to assess the role of green fiscal and monetary policies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.2748266. Monasterolo I, Raberto M (2018) The eirin flow-of-funds behavioural model of green fiscal policies and green sovereign bonds. Ecological Economics 144:228–243 United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Nordhaus W, Sztorc P (2013) Dice 2013r: Introduction and user’s manual. Available at http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/homepage/homepage/documents/DICE_Manual_100413r1.pdf Nordhaus WD (2015) Are We Approaching an Economic Singularity? Information Technology and the Future of Economic Growth. Working Paper 21547, National Bureau of Economic Research Nordhaus WD (2017) Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(7):1518–1523 North M, Macal C (2007) Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions With Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation. Oxford University Press OECD (2019) OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing Ozel B, Nathanael RC, Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2019) Macroeconomic implications of mortgage loan requirements: an agent-based approach. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 14(1):7–46 Ponta L, Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2018) An agent-based stock-flow consistent model of the sustainable transition in the energy sector. Ecological economics 145:274–300 Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2011) Debt deleveraging and business cycles: An agent-based perspective. Economics Discussion Paper (2011-31) Raberto M, Ozel B, Ponta L, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2019) From financial instability to green finance: the role of banking and credit market regulation in the eurace model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 29(1):429–465 Sachs JD, Kotlikoff LJ (2012) Smart machines and long term misery. Tech. Rep. 18629, National Bureau of Economic Research Shi Y, Han B, Zeng Y (2020) Simulating policy interventions in the interfirm diffusion of low-carbon technologies: An agent-based evolutionary game model. Journal of Cleaner Production 250 Stern N (2008) The economics of climate change. American Economic Review 98(2):1–37 Stiglitz JE (2019) Addressing climate change through price and non-price interventions. European Economic Review 119:594–612 Stiglitz JE, Stern N, Duan M, Edenhofer O, Giraud G, Heal GM, la Rovere EL, Morris A, Moyer E, Pangestu M,et al.(2017) Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices Teglio A, Raberto M, Cincotti S (2012) The impact of banks’capital adequacy regulation on the economic system: An agent-based approach. Advances in Complex Systems 15(supp02):1250040 Teglio A, Mazzocchetti A, Ponta L, Raberto M, Cincotti S (2019) Budgetary rigour with stimulus in lean times: Policy advices from an agent-based model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 157:59–83 Tol RS (1997) On the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions: an application of fund. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 2(3):151–163 Tonelli F, Fadiran G, Raberto M, Cincotti S (2016) Approaching industrial sustainability investments in resource efficiency through agent-based simulation. In: Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing, Springer, pp 145–155 Vermeulen B, Pyka A (2014) Technological progress and effects of (Supra) regional innovation and production collaboration. An agent-based model simulation study. In: IEEE/IAFE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering, Proceedings (CIFEr), pp 357–364 Vivarelli M (2014) Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of economic literature. Journal of Economic Issues 48(1):123–154 Vivarelli M, Pianta M (2000) The Employment Impact of Innovation: Evidence and Policy. London: Routledge Wei YM, Mi ZF, Huang Z (2015) Climate policy modeling: an online scie and ssci based literature review. Omega57:70–84 Wordl Bank E, Economics V (2020) State and trends of carbon pricing 2020 Zeira J (1998) Workers, machines, and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:1091—-1117 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106943 |