Dong, Xueqi and Liu, Shuo Li (2021): Proportional Tax under Ambiguity.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_107668.pdf Download (826kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper studies how investment can be influenced by common tax and monetary policies, where investment is measured by the proportion of an investor’ wealth invested in the asset that pays a random return. We further prove that all risk- uncertainty averse individuals will increase investments if and only if a type of proportional tax with full loss offset (Domar and Musgrave 1944, QJE) is imposed. This result holds: 1. under ambiguity, that is when the probability distribution of an as- set’s return is unknown; 2. when borrowing in the safe asset is allowed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Proportional Tax under Ambiguity |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Proportional Tax with Full Loss Offset, Ambiguity, Portfolio Choice |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General |
Item ID: | 107668 |
Depositing User: | Dr Xueqi Dong |
Date Deposited: | 12 May 2021 02:17 |
Last Modified: | 12 May 2021 02:17 |
References: | Boucinha and Burlon (2020). “Negative rates and the transmission of monetary policy”. In: Economic Bulletin Articles 3. Brunnermeier, Markus K and Yann Koby (2016). “The reversal interest rate: An effective lower bound on monetary policy”. In: unpublished paper, Princeton University. Buch, Claudia M, Sandra Eickmeier, and Esteban Prieto (2014). “In search for yield? Survey-based evidence on bank risk taking”. In: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 43, pp. 12–30. Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon, Peter Klibanoff, and Emre Ozdenoren (2000). “Maxmin expected utility over Savage acts with a set of priors”. In: journal of economic theory 92.1, pp. 35–65. Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone et al. (2011). “Uncertainty averse preferences”. In: Journal of Economic Theory 146.4, pp. 1275–1330. Cherchye, Laurens, Thomas Demuynck, and Bram De Rock (2014). “Revealed preference analysis for convex rationalizations on nonlinear budget sets”. In: Journal of economic theory 152, pp. 224–236. Chorvat, Terrence R (2001). “Ambiguity and income taxation”. In: Cardozo L. Rev. 23, p. 617. De Nicolo`, Gianni et al. (2010). “Monetary policy and bank risk taking”. In: Available at SSRN 1654582. Debreu, Gerard (1972). “Smooth preferences”. In: Econometrica: Journal of the Economet- ric Society, pp. 603–615. DellAriccia, Giovanni, Luc Laeven, and Robert Marquez (2014). “Real interest rates, leverage, and bank risk-taking”. In: Journal of Economic Theory 149, pp. 65–99. Dimmock, Stephen G et al. (2016). “Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence”. In: Journal of Financial Economics 119.3, pp. 559–577. Domar, Evsey D and Richard A Musgrave (1944). “Proportional income taxation and risk-taking”. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 58.3, pp. 388–422. Eggertsson, Gauti B et al. (2019). Negative nominal interest rates and the bank lending channel. Tech. rep. National Bureau of Economic Research. Ellsberg, Daniel (1961). “Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms”. In: The quarterly jour- nal of economics, pp. 643–669. Feldstein, Martin S (1969). “The effects of taxation on risk taking”. In: Journal of Political Economy 77.5, pp. 755–764. Fishburn, Peter C and R Burr Porter (1976). “Optimal portfolios with one safe and one risky asset: Effects of changes in rate of return and risk”. In: Management science 22.10, pp. 1064–1073. Forges, Francoise and Enrico Minelli (2009). “Afriat’s theorem for general budget sets”. In: Journal of Economic Theory 144.1, pp. 135–145. Gilboa, Itzhak (1987). “Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabili- ties”. In: Journal of mathematical Economics 16.1, pp. 65–88. Gilboa, Itzhak and David Schmeidler (1989). “Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior”. In: Journal of mathematical economics 18.2, pp. 141–153. Gollier, Christian (1995). “The comparative statics of changes in risk revisited”. In: Jour- nal of Economic Theory 66.2, pp. 522–535. — (2011).“Portfoliochoicesandassetprices:Thecomparativestaticsofambiguityaver- sion”. In: The Review of Economic Studies 78.4, pp. 1329–1344. Hadar, Josef and William R Russell (1969). “Rules for ordering uncertain prospects”. In: The American economic review 59.1, pp. 25–34. 12 Hadar, Josef and Tae Kun Seo (1990). “The effects of shifts in a return distribution on optimal portfolios”. In: International Economic Review, pp. 721–736. Hart, Oliver D (1975). “Some negative results on the existence of comparative statics results in portfolio theory”. In: The Review of Economic Studies 42.4, pp. 615–621. Jakobsen, Katrine et al. (2020). “Wealth taxation and wealth accumulation: Theory and evidence from Denmark”. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135.1, pp. 329–388. Klibanoff, Peter, Massimo Marinacci, and Sujoy Mukerji (2005). “A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity”. In: Econometrica 73.6, pp. 1849–1892. Konrad, Kai A (1991). “Risk taking and taxation in complete capital markets”. In: The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 16.2, pp. 167–177. Kreps, David (1988). Notes on the Theory of Choice. Westview press. Kubler, Felix, Larry Selden, and Xiao Wei (2013). “Inferior good and Giffen behavior for investing and borrowing”. In: American Economic Review 103.2, pp. 1034–53. Landais, Camille, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman (2020). “A progressive Euro- pean wealth tax to fund the European COVID response”. In: VoxEU. Lanier, Joshua (2020). “Risk, ambiguity, and Giffen assets”. In: Journal of Economic Theory 186, p. 104976. Maccheroni, Fabio, Massimo Marinacci, and Aldo Rustichini (2006). “Ambiguity aver- sion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences”. In: Econometrica 74.6, pp. 1447–1498. Machina, Mark J and Marciano Siniscalchi (2014). “Ambiguity and ambiguity aversion”. In: Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty. Vol. 1. Elsevier, pp. 729–807. Manski, Charles F (2014). “Choosing size of government under ambiguity: Infrastruc- ture spending and income taxation”. In: The Economic Journal 124.576, pp. 359–376. Mas-Colell, Andreu, Michael Dennis Whinston, Jerry R Green, et al. (1995). Microeco- nomic theory. Vol. 1. Oxford university press New York. Matzkin, Rosa L and Marcel K Richter (1991). “Testing strictly concave rationality”. In: Journal of Economic Theory 53.2, pp. 287–303. Meyer, Jack and Michael B Ormiston (1985). “Strong increases in risk and their compar- ative statics”. In: International Economic Review, pp. 425–437. — (1994). “The effect on optimal portfolios of changing the return to a risky asset: The case of dependent risky returns”. In: International Economic Review, pp. 603–612. Milgrom, Paul R (1981). “Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and ap- plications”. In: The Bell Journal of Economics, pp. 380–391. Mintz, Jack M (1981). “Some additional results on investment, risk taking, and full loss offset corporate taxation with interest deductibility”. In: The Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics 96.4, pp. 631–642. Mossin, Jan (1968). “Taxation and risk-taking: an expected utility approach”. In: Eco- nomica 35.137, pp. 74–82. Ormiston, Michael B and Edward E Schlee (2001). “Mean-variance preferences and in- vestor behaviour”. In: The Economic Journal 111.474, pp. 849–861. Publishing, OECD. (2018). The Role and Design of Net Wealth Taxes in the OECD. OECD. Sandmo, Agnar (1969). “Capital risk, consumption, and portfolio choice”. In: Economet- rica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 586–599. Schmeidler, David (1989). “Subjective probability and expected utility without additiv- ity”. In: Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 571–587. Stiglitz, Joseph E (1969). “The effects of income, wealth, and capital gains taxation on risk-taking”. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 83.2, pp. 263–283. Streeten, Paul (1953). “The effect of taxation on risk-taking”. In: Oxford Economic Papers 5.3, pp. 271–287. Strzalecki, Tomasz (2011). “Axiomatic foundations of multiplier preferences”. In: Econo- metrica 79.1, pp. 47–73. 13 Tobin, James (1958). “Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk”. In: The review of economic studies 25.2, pp. 65–86. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/107668 |