Стукач, Виктор and Аникина, Надежда and Помогаев, Виталий (2018): Влияние параметров культурного кода сотрудников организации на формирование социального капитала, сокращение трансакционных издержек в аграрной экономике. Published in: Cutting-edge Research in Agricultural Sciences,11 , Vol. 9, (25 June 2021): pp. 44-53.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_108673.pdf Download (686kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Abstract. Analytical methods such as sociological and expert interviews, content and problem-oriented analysis were used in an attempt to achieve the desired goal. The investigation of behavioural characteristics was based on G. Hofstede's parametrical models adapted to agriculture. The methods we used were intended to achieve the following goals: to reveal the essence of the agrarian sector's transactional costs while taking into account peculiar features in the field, to identify the specifics of behavioural settings and values, the specifics of cost patterns within the regional institutional interaction framework, and to analyse cultural codes and the agrarian sector's path dependence problem. The parameters of existing organisational culture were studied on the materials of the agrarian sector of the regional economy; transaction cost specifics shaped by cultural component were identified; and research on cultural codes was carried out. The agrarian sector exhibited the following characteristics: an excessive production cycle, unequal income distribution throughout the year, and dependence on natural and climatic conditions. The features outlined above demonstrate the importance of state support and a well-developed communication system. The cluster of cultural components denotes a cultural code that reflects a high level of role differentiation between men and women; prevalent collective consciousness; a tendency to avoid situations of uncertainty and clearly established courses of action and regulations; a low level of self-control and a low level of the need to satisfy basic needs. Specific transactional costs shaped by cultural determinants include: data searching, processing, and storage costs, negotiating and contracting costs, coordination costs, politicization costs, collective decision making costs, and lost profits costs. The paper aimed to help solving issues related to overcoming informal institutional limitations, also it could be applied for development and accumulation of social capital, implementation of best informal practices on costs reduction by elimination of lost profits, functioning quality increase of transactional sector of economy in general.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Влияние параметров культурного кода сотрудников организации на формирование социального капитала, сокращение трансакционных издержек в аграрной экономике |
English Title: | The influence of the parameters of the cultural code of the organization's employees on the formation of social capital, reducing transaction costs in the agricultural economy. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Keywords: Agricultural science; organizational culture; social capital; transaction costs |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries |
Item ID: | 108673 |
Depositing User: | Виктор Федорович Стукач |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jul 2021 09:49 |
Last Modified: | 29 Jul 2021 09:49 |
References: | 1. Jones N, Sophoulis CM, Iosifides T, Botetzagias I, Evangelinos K. The influence of social capital on environmental policy instruments. Environmental Politics. 2009;18(4):595-611. 2. Rupasingha A, Goetz SJ, Freshwater D. Social capital and economic growth: a county-level analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 2000;32(1379-2016-113202):565-72. 3. Gamidullaeva LA, Potapova I, Shatokhin M. Increasing Territorial Economic Growth Through Cost Optimization in the Digital Economy. InOptimizing Regional Development Through Transformative Urbanization 2019;225-250. IGI Global. 4. Douglass C North, John Joseph Wallis, Barry R Weingast. Vio- lence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Re- corded Human History. Translated in Russian by D. Uzlaner, M. Mark- ov, D. Raskova, A. Raskova. The Gaidar Institute publishing. 2011;480. 5. Maevskiy VI. Evolution theory and institutes. Vestnik gosu-darstvennogo universiteta upravleniya [Bulletin of State University of Management] (“Institutional Economics” series); 2001;1:19. 6. Polischuk L, Menyashev R. Issues of economy. Non-profit partner- ship “Editorial board “Issues of economy”. 2021;48-65. 7. John Joseph Wallis, Douglass C. North. Measuring the transac-tion sector in the American economy; in: Stanley Engermann and Rob- ert Gallman (eds.). Long-term factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago. 1986;95-161. 8. Tambovtsev VL. Institutional market as mechanism of institutional changes. Social sciences and modernity. 2001;5:25-38. 9. Kim S Kameron, Pobert E Quinn. Diagnostika i izmenenie orga- nizacionnoj kul’tury. [Diagnosis and changing organizational culture]. Translated in Russian under the editorship of I.V. Andreeva. SPB: Piter. 2001;320. 10. Popov EV, Konovalov AA. A model of information retrieval costs optimization. Problemy upravleniya [Management issues]. Institute of economics Russian Academy of Science. 2006;5:27-31. 11. VD Pak, NI Nuzhina. Basic typologies of corporate culture. Mezhdun- arodniy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal [International scientific and research journal]. Social Sciences; 2015. 12. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: Soft- ware of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for sur- vival. New York: McGraw Hill, 3rd ed. 2010;576. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/108673 |