‘Farm holding redistribution’ ratio: Official land redistribution data in search of corroborating evidence

Dy, Kenneth (2020): ‘Farm holding redistribution’ ratio: Official land redistribution data in search of corroborating evidence.

Abstract

The accomplishments of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) have been criticised for inaccurately portraying the land redistribution in the Philippines. Evidence has largely been anecdotal in nature. Examining the breakdown of the accomplishments as to region and type may reveal several important findings that aggregate accomplishment numbers conceal. But cross-validating official redistribution results with data from a different government agency offers an even more unique way to prove or disprove the claims of agrarian reform authorities. This study complements earlier investigative studies by examining whether the decennial Census of Agriculture and Fisheries can offer corroboratory or contradictory evidence to published accomplishments. A ‘farm holding redistribution’ ratio and ‘land use change’ ratio were computed for this purpose, and analysed together with regional average farm size, farm holding Gini, tenure arrangements across time. Furthermore, it looks at the change in farmland distribution before and during the CARP implementation. After scrutinizing the official accomplishments and CAF data, the findings reveal that indeed, CARP accomplishments failed to translate into landownership for small farm operators. However, there is a dim reflection of achieving its stated goals in regions that implemented more compulsory acquisition and in continuing past programs prior to the enactment of CARP.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: land redistribution, CARP, agrarian reform
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R52 - Land Use and Other Regulations

References

Borras Jr., S.M. (2007). Pro-poor Land Reform: A Critique. Ottawa, Ontario: University of Ottawa Press.

de los Reyes, V. (2016). End of Term Report of Secretary Virgilio de los Reyes (Technical Report). (unpublished; requested from DAR).

Elvinia, J. (2011). Is Land Reform a Failure in the Philippines? An Assessment on CARP. In H. Kimura, Suharko, A.B. Javier, & A. Tangsupvattana (Eds.), Limits of Good Governance in Developing Countries (pp. 333–62). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University Press.

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). (2016). Multi-sectoral study on the Agribusi- ness Venture Arrangement policy and implementation under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (Technical Report). Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6239e.pdf.

Hayami, Y., Quisumbing, M.A.R., & Adriano, L.S. (1990). Toward an alternative land reform paradigm: A Philippine perspective. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Lipton, M. (2009). Land Reform in Developing Countries: Property rights and property wrongs. New York: Routledge.

Kelly, P. F. (1998). The politics of urban rural relations: land use conversion in the Philippines. Environment and Urbanization, 10(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789801000116

Putzel, J. (1990). The Politics of the Aquino Agrarian Reform Programme: Influence of Bilateral and Multilateral Donors. In Agrarian Reform and Official Development Assistance in the Philippines (pp. 7–40). Canterbury: Center of South-East Asian Studies.

Ranada, P. (2014, March 6). DAR: CARPER extension not needed. Rappler. https://r3.rappler.com/nation/52325-agrarian-reform-extension-not-needed.

World Bank. (2009). Land Reform, Rural Development, and Poverty Reduction in the Philippines: Revisiting the Agenda. Pasig City.