Air Quality and Economic Growth: An Empirical Study

Dinda, Soumyananda and Coondoo, Dipankor and Pal, Manoranjan (1999): Air Quality and Economic Growth: An Empirical Study. Published in: Ecological Economics , Vol. 34, No. 3 (2000): pp. 409-423.

Abstract

This study has been observed an inverse (and sometimes U-shaped) relationship between environmental degradation and per capita real income as opposed to the inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) found in many earlier studies. It was felt that a possible explanation of the observed pattern of relationship might be sought in the dynamics of the process of economic growth experienced by the countries concerned. Economic development may strengthen the market mechanism as a result of which the economy may gradually shift from non-market to marketed energy resources that are less polluting. This phenomenon may show up in the form of an inverse relationship, as mentioned above. Also, due to the global technical progress the production techniques available to the countries all over the world are becoming more and more capital intensive and at the same time less polluting. This may mean that, given the income level, the pollution level decreases as the capital intensity of an economy rises. In the present study, it is indeed observed that as capital intensity increases the level of suspended particulate matter (spm) in the atmosphere decreases. Per capita real income is also found to be inversely related to spm partially, but the interaction effect of per capita income and capital-intensity on spm is observed to be positive. This suggests that, given the level of per capita income (capital intensity), a more capital-intensive production technique (a higher per capita income level) would cause less pollution. For spm a surprising result is also obtained, i.e. a U-turn is observed at a very high level of per capita real income (i.e. ~US$12 500 at 1985 US prices). This is possibly indicative of the fact that there are technological limits to industrial pollution control such that beyond a threshold level of income further rise in income cannot be achieved without environmental degradation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: EKC, Environmental degradation, SPM, SO2, Capital intensity, Market mechanism, Sectoral composition of GDP, GDP, Technological Limitation, Threshold level, U-shaped, U-tern
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

• Agras, J. and D. Chapman (1999): “A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis”, Ecological Economics 28(2), 267 - 277.

• Beckerman, W. (1992): “Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment?”, World Development 20, 481 - 496.

• Berrens, R., A. Bohara, K. Gawande and P. Wang (1997): “Testing the inverted U -hypothesis for U.S. hazardous waste: An application of the generalized gamma model”, Economic Letters 55(3), 435 - 440.

• Carson, R. T., Y. Jeon, and D. R. McCubbin (1997): “The relationship between air pollution emissions and income: US data”, Environment and developmental Economics 2, 433 - 450.

• Cole, M. A., A. J. Rayner, and J. M. Bates (1997): “The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An empirical analysis”, Environment and Development Economics 2, 401 - 416.

• de bruyn, S. M., J. C. J. M. van den bergh, and J. B. Opschoor (1998): “Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of Environmental Kuznets Curves”, Ecological Economics 25, 161 - 175.

• de bruyn, S. M., and J. B. Opschoor (1997): “Developments in the throughput -income relationship: theoretical and empirical observations”, Ecological Economics 20, 255 - 268.

• de Bruyn, S. M. (1997): “Explaining the Environmental Kuznets Curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions”, Environment and Development Economics 2, 485 – 503.

• Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger (1995): “Economic growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2), 353 - 377.

• Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger (1993): “Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement”, in P. Garber, (ed.) The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement., Cambridge: MIT Press, 13 –56.

• Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger (1991): “Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER working paper 3914.

• Hilton, F. G. H. and A. Levinson (1998): “Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Automotive Lead Emissions”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35, 126 - 141.

• Holtz-Eakin, D. and T. M. Selden (1995): “Stoking the fires?: CO2 emissions and economic growth”, Journal of Public Economics 57, 85 - 101.

• Judge, G., K. C. Hill, W.G. Griffiths, H. Lutkepohl and T.C. Lee (1985): The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd Edn, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.

• Kahn, M.E. (1998): “A household level environmental Kuznets curve”, Economics Letters 59, 269 - 273.

• Kaufmann, R. K., B. Davidsdottir, S. Garnham and P. Pauly (1998): “The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve”, Ecological Economics 25, 209 - 220.

• Komen, R., S. Gerking and H. Folmer (1997): “Income and Environmental R & D: empirical evidence from OECD countries”, Environment and Development Economics 2, 505 - 515.

• Koop, G. and L. Tole (1999): “Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation?” Journal of Development Economics 58, 231 - 244.

• Kristrom, B. and P. Riera (1996): “Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?”, Environmental and Resource Economics 7, 45-55.

• Kuznets, Simon (1955): “Economic Growth and income inequality”, American Economic Review 45, 1 - 28.

• Lopez, R. (1994): “The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization”, Journal of Environmental Economics and management 27, 163 - 184.

• Low, P. and A. Yeats (1992): “Do ‘dirty’ industries migrate?” In P. Low (ed.), International Trade and environment., World Bank., Washington, D.C.

• Mani, M. and D. Wheeler (1998): “In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy: 1960 – 1995”., Journal of Environment and Development 7(3), 215 - 247.

• McConnell, K.E. (1997): “Income and the demand for environmental quality”, Environment and Development Economics 2, 383 - 399.

• McCoskey, S. and C. Kao (1998): “A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data”, Econometric Reviews 17, 57-84.

• Moomaw, W. R. and G. C. Unruh (1997): “Are Environmental Kuznets Curve misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions”, Environment and Development Economics 2, 451 – 463.

• Munasinghe, M. (1999): “Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve”, Ecological Economics 29, 89 - 109.

• Panayotou, T. (1997): “Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool”, Environment and Development Economics 2, 465-484.

• Panayotou, T. (1993): “Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development”, ILO, Technology and Employment Programme, Geneva.

• Rothman, D. S. (1998): “Environmental Kuznets curve - real progress or passing the buck?: A case for consumption-base approaches”, Ecological Economics 25, 177-194.

• Selden, T. M. and D. Song (1994): “Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and management 27, 147 - 162.

• Sengupta, R. P. (1997): “CO2 emission - income relationship: policy approach for climate control”, Pacific Asia Journal of Energy 7(2), 207 - 229.

• Shafik, N. (1994): “Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis”, Oxford Economic Papers 46, 757 - 773.

• Torras, M. and J. K. Boyce (1998): “Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve,” Ecological Economics 25, 147-160.

• Unruh, G. C. and W. R. Moomaw (1998): “An alternative analysis of apparent EKC -type transitions”, Ecological Economics 25, 221 - 229.

• Vincent, J. R. (1997): “Testing for environmental Kuznets curves within a developing country”, Environment and Development Economics 2, 417 - 431.

• World Bank (1992): World Development Report 1992, Oxford University Press, New York.