Efficiency and factors for agricultural use of sludge in the circular Bulgarian economy

Bachev, Hrabrin and Ivanov, Bozhidar (2021): Efficiency and factors for agricultural use of sludge in the circular Bulgarian economy.

Abstract

The issue of utilization of sludge from wastewater treatment in agriculture is an important socio-economic and environmental problem in the European Union and Bulgaria. Its significance is determined by the fact that the amount of sludge formed is constantly growing, as the annual amount of sludge produced in Europe is 8.7 million dry matter, and in Bulgaria reaches 53 thousand tons of dry matter. One of the main ways to utilize sludge from wastewater treatment is its use as fertilizer in agriculture. It is becoming a topical issue along with the growing interest into the effective “transformation of wastes into products” and their inclusion in supply chains and circular economy. In other countries, there are numerous studies on the effects, factors and efficiencies of sludge use in agriculture. Despite their relevance, in-depth studies of the diverse effects and critical factors of sludge utilization in Bulgarian agriculture are at an early stage. This paper presents the results of the first part of a large-scale study aimed at determining the socio-economic effects of sludge utilization in Bulgarian agriculture. First, an approach is presented to assess the multilateral effects, efficiencies and factors of sludge utilization in agriculture. Then the various factors stimulating and limiting the utilization of sludge in Bulgarian farms are identified. The results of a case study of a holding using sludge as fertilizer are then presented. Based on a qualitative analysis of regulations and institutional structure, and surveys with managers and experts of urban wastewater treatment plants, and farmers using and not-using sludge, the institutional, political, organizational, personal, educational, informational, social, economic, and environmental factors influencing the utilization of sludge in agriculture in two regions of the country (Sofia and Burgas) are identified. Impact factors are generally divided into two types: factors influencing the behavior of agents, and factors determining the type and extent of the effects of sludge use in agriculture. Research of this type is to continue and deepen to establish the economic, sectoral and regional specificities on the basis of more representative information from all participants and interested parties in the effective utilization of sludge in the country.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: sludge, use, agriculture, factors, efficiency, Bulgaria
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing ; Cooperatives ; Agribusiness; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q14 - Agricultural Finance; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General

References

Башев Х. (2009): Оценка на въздействието на ОСП на ЕС върху устойчивостта на животновъдните стопанства, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 1, 8-18.

Башев Х. (2010): Оценка на конкурентоспособността на българските ферми, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 6, 11-26.

Башев Х. (2011): Оценка на конкурентоспособността на земеделските кооперации, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 1, 22-30.

Башев Х. (2011): Конкурентоспособностт на земеделските стопанства на физически лица, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 5, 55-65.

Башев Х., Н. Котева, М. Младенова (2014): Ефекти от прилагане на европейски политики върху земеделските стопанства в Р.България, сп. Икономика-21 4 (1), 97-114.

Башев Х. (2015): Оценка на системата за управление на аграрната устойчивост, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, бр 4, 21-48.

Башев Х. (2015): Подход за оценка на устойчивостта на земеделските стопанства, сп.Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 3, 12-36.

Башев Х. (2012): Ефективност на икономическите организации и обществената интервенция в земеделието, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 3, 24-44.

Башев Х. (2018): Въздействие На Пазарните, Частните, Колективните И Хибридните Форми На Управление Върху Аграрната Устойчивост В България, Икономика 21, Volume 8, Issue 2, 131-176.

Башев Х., Б. Иванов, Д. Тотева (2019): Устойчивост на аграрните екосистеми в България, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 1, 39-55.

Башев Х., Б. Иванов, Д. Тотева (2019): Оценка на устойчивостта на основните подотрасли на българското селско стопанство, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 2, 34-50.

Башев Х., Б. Иванов (2021): Оползотворяване на утайки в селското стопанство на България, EconPapers https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pramprapa/109606.htm

Башев Х., Б. Иванов, Д. Митова, И. Боевски, П. Маринов, А. Саров, Д. Цвяткова, К. Костенаров, Д. Ванев (2021): МЕХАНИЗМИ И ФОРМИ НА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА АГРОЕКОСИСТЕМНИТЕ УСЛУГИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ, ИАИ, София.

ИАИ (2021): Възможности от оползотворяването на утайки, получени при пречистване на отпадъчни води и ефект за устойчиво земеделие, отчет на научно-приложен проект, ИАИ.

Иванов Б., С. Маринова, Х. Башев, В. Георгиева (2020): Икономически и екологични ефекти от използване на утайките в земеделието, Екологично инженерство и опазване на околната среда, 3, 44-53.

Котева Н., Башев Х. (2010); Подход за оценка на конкурентоспособността на земеделските стопанства, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 1, 32-43.

Маринова С. (2008): Утайки от пречиствателни станции за отпадъчни води и правила за тяхното оползотворяване, София.

Сяров А. (2020): Социално-икономически, екологични и управленчески аспекти при оползотворяването на утайки в земеделието, получени при пречистване на отпадъчни води, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 1, 58-69.

Директива 86/278/ЕИО - Директива 86/278/ ЕИО за опазване на околната среда и в частност на почвите, в случаите на употреба на утайки от отпадъчни води в земеделието.

Наредба за реда и начина за оползотворяване на утайки от пречистването на отпадъчни води чрез употребата им в земеделието (приета с ПМС № 201 от 04.08.2016г.).

НСПУУ (2014): Национален стратегически план за управление на утайки от пречиствателните станции за отпадъчни води в България за периода 2014- 2020г.

ANSES (2020): Sewage sludge produced during the COVID-19 epidemic can only be applied to fields after disinfection, The French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, 02/04/2020.

Baba A., G. Tayfur, O. Gunduz, K. Howard, M. Friedel, A. Chambel (editors) (2011): Climate Change and its Effects on Water Resources, Issues of National and Global Security, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Bachev H. (2007): Governing of Agrarian Sustainability, ICFAI Journal of Environmental Law, 6, 2, 7-25.

Bachev H. (2009): Mechanisms of governance of sustainble development, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences (JAES) 4 (08), 169-184.

Bachev H. (2011): Water governance in Bulgarian agriculture, in Climate Change and its Effects on Water Resources, Springer, 215-224.

Bachev H. (2012): Governing of Agro-Ecosystem Services in Bulgaria, in Research Topics in Agricultural and Applied Economics 3, 94-129.

Bachev H. (2013): Risk management in the agri-food sector, Contemporary Economics, Volume 7, Issue 1, 45-62.

Bachev H. (2013): NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING AND IMPROVING AGRARIAN ORGANIZATIONS, Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Economics 8(150):6-17.

Bachev H. (2014): Environmental management in agriculture - Mechanisms, Forms and Efficiency, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Bachev H. (2015): An Approach to Assess Sustainability of Agricultural Farms, Turkish Economic Review, 3 (1), 29-53.

Bachev H. (2017): Socio-economic and environmental sustainability of Bulgarian farms, Agricultural and resource economics: international scientific e-journal, 29, 5-21.

Bachev H. (2018): Institutional environment and climate change impacts on sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 24 (4), 523-53.

Bachev H. (2000): Bulgarian Experience in Transformation of Farm Structures, Farm Management and Rural Planning, 1, 181-196.

Bachev H. (2002): Study on Land Supply in Bulgarian Farms, Farm Management and Rural Planning, 3, 189-203.

Bachev H. (2020): About the governance pillar of agrarian sustainability, Economic Consultant, 4 (32), 16-27.

Bachev H. and M. Kagatsume (2002): Governing of Financial Supply in Bulgarian Farms, The Natural Resource Economics Review, 8, 131-150.

Bachev H., D. Terziev (2018): A study on agrarian sustainability impact of governance modes in Bulgaria, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences 13, 1, 227-257.

Bachev H., B.Ivanov and A.Sarov (2020): Unpacking Governance Sustainability of Bulgarian Agriculture, Икономически изследвания, 6, 106-137.

Bachev H., B.Ivanov and A.Sarov (2021): Assessing Governance Aspect of Agrarian Sustainability in Bulgaria, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27 (3), 429–440.

Bachev H., B.Ivanov (2021): A STUDY ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE UTILIZATION IN BULGARIAN AGRICULTURE, Technology audit and production reserves, 5.

Barbu C. (2012): Management and Environmental Protection, ASERS Publishing.

Csaki C., C. Forgács, D. Milczarek, J. (editors) (2008): Regional Outcome: Central and Eastern Europe. Restructuring market relations in food and agriculture of Central and Eastern Europe - Impacts upon small farmers, Budapest.

Daniels J. (2011): Advances in Environmental Research, New York: Nova Science.

Ivanov B. and H. Bachev (2021): Convergent analysis of waste water practices among EU countries, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27, 2, 289–296.

EC (2008): Environmental, economic and social impacts of the use of sewage sludge on land, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/waste/sludge/pdf/part_i_report.pdf

Ekane N., K. Barquet1 and A. Rosemarin (2021): Resources and Risks: Perceptions on the Application of Sewage Sludge on Agricultural Land in Sweden, a Case Study, Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 19 April 2021. | EU (2021): Roundtable discussion on sludge use, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/waste/sludge/pdf/workshoppart5.pdf

EurEau (2021): Wate water treatment –sludge management. Eur Eau.

Hudcová H., J. Vymazal, Miloš Rozkošný (2019): Present restrictions of sewage sludge application in agriculture within the European Union, Soil and Water Research, 14, (2): 104–120.

Iticescu C., P. Georgescu, M. Arseni, A. Rosu, M.Timofti, G.Carp, L.Cioca (2021): Optimal Solutions for the Use of Sewage Sludge on Agricultural Lands. Water, 13, 585.

Mykhailova L., N. Stoyanets, A. Mykhailov, T. Kharchenko, H. Bachev (2018): Sustainable development of the Ukrainian agrarian sector: perspectives and challenges, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16, 3, 28-39.

Rosiek K. (2020): Directions and Challenges in the Management of Municipal Sewage Sludge in Poland in the Context of the Circular Economy, Sustainability, 12, 3686.

Rosemarin A., B. Macura, J. Carolus, K. Barquet, F.Ek, L.Järnberg, D. Lorick, S. Johannesdottir, S.Pedersen, J.Koskiaho, N.Haddaway, T.Okruszko (2020): Circular nutrient solutions for agriculture and wastewater – a review of technologies and practices, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 45,78-91.

Scozzari A., B. Mansouri (2011): Water Security in the Mediterranean Region, An International Evaluation of Management, Control, and Governance Approaches, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

The European Green Deal (2019): COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS, European Commission, 11.12.2019.

Tesfamariam E., Z.Ogbazghi, J.Annandale, Y. Gebrehiwot (2020): Cost–Benefit Analysis of Municipal Sludge as a Low-Grade Nutrient Source: A Case Study from South Africa, Sustainability, 12, 9950.

Taşeli B. (2020): Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Sewage Sludge (Biosolid) Management Options, Intech, https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/71033

Usman K., S. Khan, S. Ghulam, M. Umar, N. Khan, S.Khalil (2012): Sewage Sludge: An Important Biological Resource for Sustainable Agriculture and Its Environmental Implications, American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2012, 3, 1708-1721.