Price and quality competition in a mixed duopoly : Differential game approach

Okuyama, Suzuka (2021): Price and quality competition in a mixed duopoly : Differential game approach.

Abstract

This paper investigates price and quality competition in a mixed duopoly market, where a state-owned welfare-maximizing public firm competes against a profit-maximizing private firm. We use a differential game approach with a Hotelling spatial competition framework. We extend Cellini et al.(2018) by incorporating a state-owned public firm and derive open- and closed-loop solutions. The steady-state quality levels are optimal in the open-loop solution. Numerical results show that the steady-state quality level of the public firm in the closed-loop solution does not necessarily lower than that in the open-loop solution. As a private firm's investment is large, the public firm’s incentive for quality improvement increases since there exists intertemporal strategic substitutability between investment and quality. Competition and privatization policies are neutral under the open-loop solution but not under the closed-loop solution. Competition policy improves social welfare with an increase in quality and privatization policy improves it with an decrease in quality in the closed-loop solution.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Mixed oligopoly, Privatization, Differential-game, Quality.
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

References

[1] Bisceglia, M., Cellini, R., & Grilli, L. (2019). Quality competition in healthcare services with regional regulators: A differential game approach. Dynamic Games and Applications, 9(1).

[2] Brekke, K. R., Cellini, R., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2010). Competition and quality in health care markets: A differential-game approach. Journal of Health Economics, 29(4), 508-523.

[3] Brekke, K. R., Cellini, R., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2012). Competition in regulated markets with sluggish beliefs about quality. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 21(1), 131-178.

[4] Buehler, S., & Wey, S. (2014). When do state-owned firms crowd out private investment? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14, 319-330.

[5] Cellini, R., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2018). A dynamic model of quality competition with endogenous prices. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 94, 190-206.

[6] Dockner, E. J., Jorgensen, S., Long, N.V., & Sorger, G. (2000). Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[7] Futagami, K., Matsumura, T., & Takao, K. (2019). Mixed duopoly: Differential game approach. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 21, 771-793.

[8] Heywood, J. S., & Ye, G. (2009). Partial privatization in a mixed duopoly with an R&D rivalry. Bulletin of Economic Research, 61, 165-178.

[9] Ishibashi, K., & Kaneko, T. (2008). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly with price and quality competition. Journal of Economics/ Zeitschrift Fur Nationalokonomie, 95, 213-231.

[10] Jun, B., & Vives, X. (2004). Strategic incentives in dynamic duopoly. Journal of Economic Theory, 116, 249-281.

[11] Kuo, H., Lai, F., & Ueng, K. L. G. (2020). Privatization neutrality with quality and subsidies. Japanese Economic Review, 71, 405-419.

[12] Laine, L. T., & Ma, C. A. (2017). Quality and competition between public and private firms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 140, 336-353.

[13] Ma, C. A., & Burgess Jr., J. F. (1993). Quality competition, welfare, and regulation. Journal of Economics Zeitschrift F ˜ AOEr National˜ A¶konomie, 58, 153-173.

[14] Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 473-483.

[15] Matsumura, T., & Matsushima, N. (2004). Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: A mixed duopoly approach. Economica, 71, 671-688.

[16] Nishimori, A., & Ogawa, H. (2002). Public monopoly, mixed oligopoly and productive efficiency. Australian Economic Papers, 41, 185-190.

[17] Sanjo, Y. (2009). Quality choice in a health care market: A mixed duopoly approach. European Journal of Health Economics, 10, 207-215.

[18] Siciliani, L., Rune Straume, O., & Cellini, R. (2013). Quality competition with motivated providers and sluggish demand. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(10), 2041-2061.

[19] Spence, M., (1975). Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics,6, 417-429.