Pandemia COVID-19 z perspektywy teorii ryzyka

Klimczuk, Andrzej (2021): Pandemia COVID-19 z perspektywy teorii ryzyka. Published in:

Abstract

The article presents an overview of selected connections of the COVID-19 pandemic with risk theories. The study first explores the basic concepts of preparing and mobilizing networks of public policy actors to act together under conditions of uncertainty. The following section discusses the pandemic risk preparedness and fighting. Then, selected possible social, economic and political effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed. In summary, recommendations regarding the public management in the further stages of the pandemic development and in the post-pandemic period were indicated, as well as proposals for further research directions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspective of Risk Theory
• Language: Polish
• Keywords: kapitał społeczny; risk in public management and public policy; risk theory; ryzyko w zarządzaniu publicznym i polityce publicz; social capital; teoria ryzyka; teoria zaufania; trust theory
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H12 - Crisis Management; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health

References

Arnoldi, J. (2011). Ryzyko. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!

Bardwell, L. V. (1991). Problem-framing: a perspective on environmental problem-solving. Environmental Management, 15(5), 603-612.

EUAFR (European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights) (2020). Coronavirus Pandemic in the EU: Fundamental Rights Implications. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Euronews (2020). Coronavirus: Half of Humanity on Lockdown in 90 Countries. Euronews. Pobrano z https://www.euronews.com/2020/04/02/coronavirus-in-europe-spain-s-death-toll-hits-10-000-after-record-950-new-deaths-in-24-hou

GPMB (Global Preparedness Monitoring Board) (2019). A World at Risk: Annual Report on Global Preparedness for Health Emergencies. Geneva: GPMB; WHO.

Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, A. (2006). Siedem kultur kapitalizmu: USA, Japonia, Niemcy, Francja, Wielka Brytania, Szwecja, Holandia (Wyd. 4). Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.

Kashnitsky, I., i Aburto, J. M. (2020). COVID-19 in Unequally Ageing European Regions. Center for Open Science. Pobrano z https://osf.io/download/5e7166390cd06c04430015e8/

Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., . . . Ratick, S. (2005). The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. W: J. X. Kasperson i R. E. Kasperson (Eds.), The Social Contours of Risk: Volume I: Publics, Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Risk (s. 99-114). London, Sterling Va.: Earthscan.

Klimczuk, A. (2012a). Experts and Cultural Narcissism: Relations in the Early 21st Century. Saarbrücken: LAP.

Klimczuk, A. (2012b). Kapitał społeczny ludzi starych na przykładzie mieszkańców miasta Białystok. Lublin: Wiedza i Edukacja.

Klimczuk, A., Klimczuk-Kochańska, M., Berde, E., Dovie, D. A., i Spinelli, G. (Eds.) (2021). Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Socio-Economic Systems in the Post-Pandemic World: Design Thinking, Strategic Planning, Management, and Public Policy (w opracowaniu). Lausanne: Frontiers Media.

Kluth, A. (2020, April 11). This Pandemic Will Lead to Social Revolutions. Bloomberg. Pobrano z https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-this-pandemic-will-lead-to-social-revolutions

Madhav, N., Oppenheim, B., Gallivan, M., Mulembakani, P., Rubin, E., i Wolfe, N. (2018). Pandemics: Risks, Impacts, and Mitigation. W: D. T. Jamison, H. Gelband, S. Horton, P. Jha, R. Laxminarayan, C. N. Mock, i R. Nugent (Eds.), Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition, Volume 9: Improving Health and Reducing Poverty (s. 315-345). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Raphael, B. (1986). When Disaster Strikes: How Individuals and Communities Cope with Catastrophe. New York, NY: Basic Books.

RCB (Rządowe Centrum Bezpieczeństwa) (2013). Ocena ryzyka na potrzeby zarządzania kryzysowego. Raport o zagrożeniach bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Warszawa: Rządowe Centrum Bezpieczeństwa.

Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge, UK, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Sztompka, P. (2007). Zaufanie: Fundament społeczeństwa. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.

UN (United Nations) (2020a). Shared Responsibility, Global Solidarity: Responding to the Socio-Economic Impacts of COVID-19. New York, NY: United Nations.

UN (United Nations) (2020b, March 31). United Nations Secretary-General Launches Plan to Address the Potentially Devastating Socio-Economic Impacts of COVID-19. New York, NY: United Nations.

van Hoof, E. (2020, April 17). Lockdown Is the World's Biggest Psychological Experiment - and We Will Pay the Price. World Economic Forum. Pobrano z https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/this-is-the-psychological-side-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-that-were-ignoring/

WEF (World Economic Forum) (2020a). The Global Risks Report 2020 15th Edition. Cologny, Geneva: WEF.

WEF (World Economic Forum) (2020b, March 18). Strategic Intelligence: COVID-19. Pobrano z https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G0X000006O6EHUA0?tab=publications

WHO (World Health Organization) (2020, April 14). Country Preparedness and Response Status for COVID-19 as of 16 March 2020. Pobrano z https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/updated-country-preparedness-and-response-status-for-covid-19-as-of-16-march-2020