Costantiello, Alberto and Laureti, Lucio and Leogrande, Angelo and Marco, Matarrese (2021): The Innovation Linkages in Europe.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111038.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this article we investigate the determinants of the Innovation Linkages in Europe. We use data from the European Innovation Scoreboard of the European Commission in the period 2000-2019 for 36 countries. Data are analyzed using Panel Data with Fixed Effects, Random Effects, Dynamic Panel at 1 Stage, Dynamic Panel at 2 Stage, Pooled OLS, WLS. Results show that the Innovation Linkages in Europe is positively associated with “Buyer Sophistication”, “Government Procurement of Advanced Technology Products”, “Finance and Support”, “Firm Investments”, “Human Resources”, and negatively associated with “Population Density”, “Employment Share Services”.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Innovation Linkages in Europe |
English Title: | The Innovation Linkages in Europe |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | O30; O31, O32; O33; O36. |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 111038 |
Depositing User: | Dr Angelo Leogrande |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2021 08:37 |
Last Modified: | 13 Dec 2021 08:37 |
References: | [1] R. M. Solow, «A contribution to the theory of economic growth,» The quarterly journal of economics, vol. 70, n. 1, pp. 65-94, 1956. [2] P. M. Romer, «The origins of endogenous growth,» Journal of Economic perspectives, vol. 8, n. 1, pp. 3-22, 1994. [3] J. A. Schumpeter e R. Opie, The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, 1934. [4] A. Marshall, Industry and Trade: A Study of Industral Technique and Business Organization, and of Their Influences on the Conditions of Various Classes and Nations, Macmillian, 1920. [5] G. Becattini, Industrial districts: A new approach to industrial change, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004. [6] G. Becattini, «Industrial sectors and industrial districts: Tools for industrial analysis,» European planning studies, vol. 10, n. 4, pp. 483-493, 2002. [7] M. Polanyi, The tacit dimension, Chicago: University of Chicago press, 2009. [8] K. J. Arrow, «The economic implications of learning by doing,» in Readings in the Theory of Growth, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 1971, pp. 131-149. [9] C. Hidalgo, Why information grows: The evolution of order, from atoms to economies, Basic Books, 2015. [10] D. Bahar, R. Hausmann e C. A. Hidalgo, «Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion?,» Journal of International Economics, vol. 92, n. 1, pp. 111-123, 2014. [11] C. A. Hidalgo, P. A. Balland, R. Boschma, Delgado, F. M., F. M., K. e S. Zhu, «The principle of relatedness,» International conference on complex systems , pp. 451-457, 2018. [12] P. A. Balland, C. Jara-Figueroa, S. G. Petralia, M. P. Steijn, D. L. Rigby e C. A. Hidalgo, «Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities,» Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 4, n. 3, pp. 248-254, 2020. [13] D. Chybowska, L. Chybowski e V. Souchkov, «R&D in Poland: is the country close to a knowledge-driven economy?,» Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 26, n. 2, pp. 99-105, 2018. [14] A. Pleśniarska, «The Intensity of University Business Collaboration in the EU,» Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, vol. 6, n. 339, pp. 147-160, 2018. [15] S. Sağ, B. Sezen e M. Güzel, «Factors that motivate or prevent adoption of open innovation by SMEs in developing countries and policy suggestions,» Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 235, pp. 756-763, 2016. [16] N. Theyel, «Extending open innovation throughout the value chain by small and medium-sized manufacturers,» International Small Business Journal, vol. 31, n. 3, pp. 256-274, 2013. [17] C. E. De Marco, I. Martelli e A. Di Minin, «European SMEs’ engagement in open innovation When the important thing is to win and not just to participate, what should innovation policy do?,» Technological Forecasting and Social Change, p. 152, 2020. [18] A. Leckel, S. Veilleux e L. P. Dana, «Local open innovation: a means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs,» Technological Forecasting and Social Change, p. 153, 2020. [19] A. Padilla-Meléndez, A. R. Del Aguila-Obra e N. Lockett, «Shifting sands: Regional perspectives on the role of social capital in supporting open innovation through knowledge transfer and exchange with small and medium-sized enterprises,» nternational Small Business Journal, vol. 31, n. 3, pp. 296-318, 2013. [20] B. Bigliardi e F. Galati, «Which factors hinder the adoption of open innovation in SMEs?,» Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 28, n. 8, pp. 869-885, 2016. [21] D. Schuurman, B. Baccarne, L. D. Marez, C. Veeckman e P. Ballon, «Living Labs as open innovation systems for knowledge exchange: solutions for sustainable innovation development,» International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 10, n. 2-3, pp. 322-340, 2016. [22] M. Wältermann, G. Wolff e O. Rank, «Formal and informal cross-cluster networks and the role of funding: A multi-level network analysis of the collaboration among publicly and privately funded cluster organizations and their managers,» Social Networks, vol. 58, pp. 116-127, 2019. [23] G. Crespi, L. F. Garone, A. Maffioli e E. Stein, «Public support to R&D, productivity, and spillover effects: Firm-level evidence from Chile,» World Development, p. 130, 2020. [24] R. Raudla, E. Karo, K. Valdmaa e R. Kattel, «Implications of project-based funding of research on budgeting and financial management in public universities,» Higher Education, vol. 70, n. 6, pp. 957-971, 2015. [25] D. Bondonio, F. Biagi e J. Stancik, «Counterfactual impact evaluation of public funding of innovation, investment and R&D,» Joint Research Centre, n. JRC99564, 2016. [26] F. E. Casals, «The SME co-operation framework: A multi-method secondary research approach to SME collaboration,» 2010 International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics IPEDR, vol. 31, pp. 118-124, 2011. [27] M. Martínez-Costa, D. Jiménez-Jiménez e H. A. Dine Rabeh, «The effect of organisational learning on interorganisational collaborations in innovation: an empirical study in SMEs,» Knowledge Management Research & Practice, vol. 17, n. 2, pp. 137-150, 2019. [28] A. Zygmunt, «External linkages and intellectual assets as indicators of firms? innovation activities: results from the Czech Republic and Poland,» Oeconomia copernicana, vol. 10, n. 2, pp. 291-308, 2019. [29] N. Siripitakchai e K. Miyazaki, «University-Industry Linkages (UILs) and Research Collaborations: Case of Thailand’s National Research Universities (NRUs). In Industrial Engineering,» Management Science and Applications 2015, pp. 189-198, 2015. [30] G. Abramo, C. D’Angelo e M. Solazzi, «Assessing public–private research collaboration: is it possible to compare university performance?,» Scientometrics, vol. 84, n. 1, pp. 173-197, 2010. [31] J. C. K. Lam, P. Hills e C. K. Ng, «Open innovation: A study of industry-university collaboration in environmental R&D in Hong Kong,» International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 2013. [32] B. Bye, K. M. e A. Raknerud, «The impact of public R&D support on firms' patenting,» Discussion Papers, n. 911 , 2019. [33] H. Hollanders, N. Es-Sadki, D. Vértesy e G. Damioli, «European Innovation Scoreboard 2017–Methodology Report,» European Commission, 2017. [34] L. Laureti, A. Costantiello e A. Leogrande, «The Finance-Innovation Nexus in Europe,» IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, n. 2, pp. 11-55, 2020. [35] A. Costantiello e A. Leogrande, «The innovation-employment nexus in Europe.,» American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 166-187, 2020. [36] P. A. Balland, C. Jara-Figueroa, S. G. Petralia, M. P. Steijn, D. L. Rigby e C. A. Hidalgo, «Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities,» Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 4, pp. 248-254, 2020. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111038 |