How personality traits affect the way Gen Z faces economic and environmental sustainability: an econometric investigation

Canova, Luciano and Paladino, Giovanna (2022): How personality traits affect the way Gen Z faces economic and environmental sustainability: an econometric investigation.

Abstract

Before the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, awareness of the relevance of sustainability issues and climate change had increased significantly, especially among the younger generation. The COVID-19 pandemic and the related shutdown of many economic activities raised concerns about the conservation of biodiversity and the environment and about the state of personal economic well-being. Theoretically, at least two associations between sustainability and personal financial habits are relevant: a) they concern the decision-making process regarding the use of scarce resources, and b) they need a medium/long-term horizon as they exert their impacts over time. In this study, we examined how Generation Z deals with issues of sustainability and money management. By using the technique of the principal components, two synthetic indexes were derived on the basis of a set of multivariate information from a questionnaire that investigated the approach to the issue of sustainability by a representative sample of 400 girls aged between 13 and 18 years. The GREEN INDEX represents environmental practices, and the MONEY INDEX represents habits in money management. They are used as dependent variables to detect how socio-demographic factors and personality elements influence the degree of awareness. Our results show the importance of character traits at both levels of awareness and the strong association between attention to money management and a sense of responsibility toward the environment, highlighting the possibility that financial education can set in motion a virtuous circle.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sustainability, Environment, Financial Education, Gen Z
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G10 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J53 - Labor-Management Relations ; Industrial Jurisprudence; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General

References

Bamber S. and Moser G., 2007, Twenty Years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A New Meta-Analysis of Psycho-Social Determinants of Pro-environmental Behaviour, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 27(1), Pages 14-25

Bollani, L.; Bonadonna, A.; Peira, G. The Millennials’ Concept of Sustainability in the Food Sector. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102984

Breßler J. and Kappler S., 2017, A Systematic Review of Education for Sustainable Development, Chemnitz Economic Papers, No. 007, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz

Cho, M.; Bonn, M.A.; Han, S.J. Generation Z’s Sustainable Volunteering: Motivations, Attitudes and Job Performance Sustainability 2018, 10, 1400 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051400

D’Alessio G., De Bonis R., Neri A. and Rampazzi C., 2020, L’Alfabetizzazione Finanziaria degli Italiani: i Risultati dell’Indagine della Banca d’Italia del 2020, Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers), Banca d’Italia, numero 588

Filmer D. and Pritchett LH., 2001, Estimating Wealth Effect Without Expenditure Data – or Tears: an Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India, Demography, Volume 38, Pages 115-132

Greene, H.W., 2017, Econometric Analysis, Eighth Edition Pearson Educational International, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Li J. and Leonas K.K. (2022) Generation Z female consumers’ preferences for swimwear products with sustainability relevant attributes, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 13, 44-60, doi: 10.1080/20932685.2021.1960580

List MK, Schmidt F.T.C, Mundt D. e Foste-Eggers D., 2020, Still Green at Fifteen? Investigating Environmental Awareness of the PISA 2015 Population: Cross-National Differences and Correlates, Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, Volume 12(7), Pages 1-20

McCoy, L.; Wang, Y.-T.; Chi, T. Why Is Collaborative Apparel Consumption Gaining Popularity? An Empirical Study of US Gen Z Consumers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8360 https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158360

Poirier J.M., Grepin K.A. and Grignon M., 2020, Approaches and Alternatives to the Wealth Index to Measure Socioeconomic Status Using Survey Data: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis, Social Indicators Research, Volume 148, Pages 1–46

Samuelsson I.P. and Park E., 2017, How to Educate Children for Sustainable Learning and for a Sustainable World, International Journal of Early Childhood, Volume 49, Pages 273–285

Shearer E. and Mitchell A., 2021, News Use across Social Platforms in 2020, Pew Research Center, January

Sommerville M. and Williams C., 2015, Sustainability Education in Early Childhood: An Updated Review of Research in the Field, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, Volume 16(2), Pages 102–117

Vyas S. and Kumaranayake L., 2006, Constructing Socio Economic Status Indices: How to Use Principal Components Analysis, Health Policy and Planning, Volume 21(6), Pages 459–468

White, J., McCoy M. and Watkins K., 2018, Exploring the Relationship between Sustainability and Personal finance, The Forum Journal, Volume 22, Pages 1-12