Capturing Income Distributions and Inequality Indices Using NETs (Negative Extremal Transfers)

Billette de Villemeur, Etienne and Leroux, Justin (2022): Capturing Income Distributions and Inequality Indices Using NETs (Negative Extremal Transfers).

Abstract

We introduce the concept of negative extremal transfers (NETs), which are transfers from the poorest individuals to the richest individuals. This family of transfers alone is rich enough to describe the entire space of income distributions: our first result is that any income distribution can be obtained as an expansion from the uniform distribution by applying a sequence of NETs. In other words, NETs constitute a mathematical basis of the space of income distributions. Our second representation theorem establishes that one can describe any given inequality index based on the weight it attaches to all possible NETs.

These results allow one to observe how much importance a given inequality index attaches to poverty concerns in addition to inequality concerns. Anecdotally, we find that indices used in practice lie in a relatively small region of the index space: our NET representation theorem can serve as a guide to proposing new inequality indices. Practitioners will find this representation result useful to quantify the contribution of a given quantile or subgroup to the population's inequality level as well as to guide policy toward the most effective transfers to lower the inequality measure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Inequality Indices; Income Distributions; Negative Extremal Transfers (NETs)
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty

References

Adler, M. Measuring Social Welfare, Oxford University Press, 2019.

Amiel, Y, and F. Cowell (1998) ‘Distributional orderings and the transfer principle: a re-examination.’ Research on Economic Inequality 8: 195-215.

Amiel, Y., & Cowell, F. (1999). Thinking about inequality: Personal judgment and income distributions. Cambridge University Press.

Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244-263.

Chantreuil, F., and A. Trannoy, A. (1999) “Inequality decomposition values” Annales d’´economie et de Statistique, 101–102, 13-36

Cowell, F., Measuring Inequality, Oxford University Press, 2011.

Dalton, H. (1920). The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes, The Economic Journal, 30, 348-361.

Fleurbaey, M. and D. Blanchet, Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability, Oxford University Press, 2013.

Foster, J.E., Greer, J. and E. Thorbecke (1984) “A class of decomposable poverty indices” Econometrica 52, 761–765

Gaertner, W., & Schokkaert, E. (2012). Empirical social choice: questionnaire-experimental studies on distributive justice. Cambridge University Press.

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.

Sen, A., Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.

Shorrocks, A.F. (1980) “The class of additively decomposable inequality measures” Econometrica 48, 613–625.

Shorrocks, A.F. (1982) “Inequality decomposition by factor components” Econometrica 50, 193–211.

Shorrocks, A.F. (1984) “Inequality decomposition by population subgroups” Econometrica 52, 1369–1385.

Shorrocks, A.H. (2013) “Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: A unified framework based on the Shapley value”, Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 99–126.

Silber, J. (Ed), Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement, Springer, 1999.