Testing for the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis between South Africa and its main trading partners: application of the quantile approach

Hendriks, Johannes Jurgens and Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo (2022): Testing for the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis between South Africa and its main trading partners: application of the quantile approach.

Abstract

This paper tests whether the PPP theory holds between trading partners, depending on the volume of trade and trade friction, such as exchange control. The test is applied between South Africa, a country that applies an exchange control policy, and its trading partners. The paper uses the quantile unit root test and quantile cointegration regression approach to test for the strong and weak-form PPP hypothesis. Strong evidence of the weak-form PPP hypothesis is found for high export countries over all quantiles. Specifically, weak-form PPP is found in China, the United States, Japan and the United Kingdom, whereas evidence of PPP, in general, was found to be lacking. The paper finds evidence that PPP is more likely to exist between countries with more significant trade volumes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: purchasing power parity, quantile, exchange rates
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange

References

Alba, J., and Papell, D. (2007). Purchasing power parity and country characteristics: Evidence from panel data tests. Journal of Development Economics, 83, 240–251

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T., Chen, T.-H. & Tzeng, H.-W., 2016. Quantile unit root test and the PPP in Africa. Applied Economics, 49(19), pp. 1913-1921.

Bonga-Bonga, L., 2011. Testing for the purchasing power parity hypothesis in a small open economy: A VAR-X Approach. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 10(12), pp. 97-106.

Chang, Y., 2002. Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. Journal of Econometrics, 110(2), pp. 261-292.

Corbae, D. & Ouliaris, S., 1988. Cointegration and tests of purchasing power parity. Review of Economics & Statistics, 70(3), p. 508.

Darby, M. R. & Lothian, J. R., 1983. Movements in Purchasing Power Parity: The Short and Long Runs. In: A. E. Gandolfi, A. J. Schwartz & A. C. Stockman, eds. The International Transmission of Inflation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 462-477.

Engle, R. F. & Granger, 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), pp. 251-276.

Fuller, D. A. D. a. W. A., 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366, part 1), pp. 427-431.

Global Edge, 2016. Global Edge. [Online] Available at: https://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/south-africa/tradestats. [Accessed 23 10 2018].

Granger, C. W. J., 1984. Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 2, p. 1023–1100.

Gyamfi, E., 2017. Testing the Validity of Purchasing Power Parity in the BRICS: Further Evidence. EuroEconomica, Volume 36, pp. 117-122.

International Monetary Fund, 2018. IMF. [Online]. Available at: www.imf.org. [Accessed 20 10 2018].

Johansen, S., 1988. Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Volume 12, pp. 231-254.

Johansen, S., Juselius, K., (March 1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration – With Applications To the Demand For Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52 (2), 169-210.

Johnson, D. R., 1990. Co-Integration, Error and Purchasing Power Parity between Canada and the United States. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 23(4), pp. 839-855.

Kim, H. & Moh, Y.-K., 2010. A century of purchasing power parity confirmed The role of nonlinearity. Journal of International Money and Finance, Volume 29, pp. 1398-1405.

Koenker, R. & Xiao, Z., 2004. Unit root quantile autoregression inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume 99, pp. 775-787.

Kovoes, P. & Seifert, B., 1985. Purchasing Power Parity and Black Markets. Financial Management, 14(3), pp. 40-46.

Lopez, C., Murray, C. J. & Papell, D. H., 2005. State of the Art Unit Root Tests and Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 37(2), pp. 361-369.

Lyon, M. & Olmo, J., 2017. Does the PPP condition hold for oil-exporting countries? A quantile cointegration regression approach. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 23(2), pp. 79-93.

Mark, N. C., 1987. Real and nominal exchange rates in the long run: an empirical investigation. Mimeo, Ohio State University.

Ma, W., Li, H. & Park, S. Y., 2017. Empirical conditional quantile test for purchasing power parity: Evidence from East Asian countries. International Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 49, pp. 122-222.

Pedroni, P., 2001. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume 83, pp. 727-731.

Peng, H. & Chang, T., 2017. Revisiting purchasing power parity in BRICS countries using more powerful quantile unit-root tests with stationary covariates. Communications in Statistics: Theory & Methods, 46(20), pp. 10051-10057.

Peng, H., Liu, Z. & Chang, T., 2017. Revisiting purchasing power parity in BRICS countries using more powerful quantile unit-root tests with stationary covariates. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46(20), pp. 10051-10057.

Phillips, P. C. & Perron, P., 1988. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrica, 75(2), pp. 335-346.

Phillips, P. & Pherron, P., 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrica, Volume 75, pp. 335-346.

Pippenger, M. & Goering, G., 1993. A note on the empirical power of unit root tests under threshold processes. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Volume 55, pp. 473-481.

Robertson, R., Kumar, A. & Dutkowsky, D., 2014. Weak-form and strong-form purchasing power parity between the US and Mexico: A panel cointegration investigation. Journal of Macroeconomics, Volume 42, pp. 241-262.

Roll, R., 1979. Violations of Purchasing Power Parity and their Implications for Efficient International Commodity Markets. International Finance and Trade, Volume 1, pp. 133-176.

Said, E. & Dickey, D. A., 1984. Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrica, Volume 71, pp. 599-607.

Sercu, P., Uppal, R. & Hulle, C., 1995. The exchange rate in the presence of transaction costs: implications for tests of purchasing power parity. Econometrica, Volume 69, pp. 473-498.

Su, C.-W., Chang, H.-L., Chang, T. & Lee, C.-H., 2012. Purchasing power parity for BRICS: linear and nonlinear unit root tests with stationary covariates. Applied Economics Letters, Volume 19, pp. 1587-1591.

Taylor, 2002. A century of purchasing power parity. The Review of Economics and Statistics , Volume 84, pp. 139-150.

Taylor, A. M. & Taylor, M. P., 2004. The Purchasing Power Parity Debate. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), pp. 135-158.

Taylor, M. P., 1988. An empirical examination of long-run purchasing power parity using cointegration techniques. Applied Economics, Volume 20, pp. 1369-1381.

Taguchi,H. 2010. "Feasibility of Currency Unions in Asia - An Assessment Using Generalized Purchasing Power Parity -," Public Policy Review, , vol. 6(5), pages 859-872.

Xiao, Z., 2009. Quantile cointegration regression. Journal of Econometrics, Volume 150, pp. 248-260.