Schöttker, Oliver and Wätzold, Frank (2021): Climate change and the cost-effective governance mode for biodiversity conservation.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_113036.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Climate change poses a key challenge for biodiversity conservation. In particular, conservation agencies have to spatially allocate conservation measures in a way that enables species to move with climate change. Moreover, they can choose two main governance modes: (1) buy land to implement conservation measures themselves on their land, or (2) compensate landowners for voluntarily providing conservation measures on their land. We develop a dynamic, conceptual ecological-economic model to investigate the influence of changes in climatic parameters on the cost-effectiveness of these governance modes and specific patch selection strategies (price prioritization, species abundance prioritization, climate suitability prioritization, climate change direction prioritization). We identify five effects, which explain the cost-effectiveness performance of the combinations of governance mode and patch selection strategy, and find that their cost-effectiveness depends on climate parameters and is thus case-specific.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Climate change and the cost-effective governance mode for biodiversity conservation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | agri-environment scheme; biodiversity; conservation payments; cost-effectiveness; land acquisition; make-or-buy decision; payments for environmental services; modes of governance |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q19 - Other Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 113036 |
Depositing User: | Oliver Schöttker |
Date Deposited: | 13 May 2022 08:04 |
Last Modified: | 13 May 2022 08:04 |
References: | Alagador D, Cerdeira JO, Araújo MB (2014) Shifting protected areas: scheduling spatial priorities under climate change. J Appl Ecol 51:703–713. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12230 Alagador D, Cerdeira JO, Araújo MB (2016) Climate change, species range shifts and dispersal corridors: an evaluation of spatial conservation models. Methods Ecol Evol 7:853–866. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12524 Albers HJ, Ando AW, Batz MB (2006) Patterns of Multi-Agent Land Conservation: Crowding In/Out, Agglomeration, and Policy. SSRN Electron J. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.910983 Albers HJ, Busby GM, Hamaide B, et al (2016) Spatially-Correlated Risk in Nature Reserve Site Selection. PLoS One 11:e0146023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146023 Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S, Solow A (1998) Species Distributions, Land Values, and Efficient Conservation. Science (80- ) 279:2126–2128. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5359.2126 Ando AW, Langpap C (2018) The Economics of Species Conservation. Annu Rev Resour Econ 10:445–467. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-022921 Ansell D, Freudenberger D, Munro N, Gibbons P (2016) The cost-effectiveness of agri-environment schemes for biodiversity conservation: A quantitative review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 225:184–191. doi: 10.1016/J.AGEE.2016.04.008 Araújo MB, Alagador D, Cabeza M, et al (2011) Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecol Lett 14:484–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01610.x Armsworth PR (2018) Time discounting and the decision to protect areas that are near and threatened or remote and cheap to acquire. Conserv Biol 32:1063–1073. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13129 Armsworth PR, Acs S, Dallimer M, et al (2012) The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs. Ecol Lett 15:406–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01747.x Banerjee P, Wossink A, Pal R (2016) Going green to be seen: The case of biodiversity protection on farmland. Manchester Curran M, Kiteme B, Wünscher T, et al (2016) Pay the farmer, or buy the land?—Cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services versus land purchases or easements in Central Kenya. Ecol Econ 127:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.016 Drechsler M (2020) Conservation management in the face of climatic uncertainty – the roles of flexibility and robustness. Ecol Complex 43:100849. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100849 Drechsler M (2017) Performance of Input- and Output-based Payments for the Conservation of Mobile Species. Ecol Econ 134:49–56. doi: 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2016.12.022 Drechsler M, Johst K, Wätzold F (2017) The cost-effective length of contracts for payments to compensate land owners for biodiversity conservation measures. Biol Conserv 207:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.01.014 Drechsler M, Smith HG, Sturm A, Wätzold F (2016) Cost-effectiveness of conservation payment schemes for species with different range sizes. Conserv Biol 30:894–899. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12708 Ferraro PJ, Pattanayak SK (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biol 4:482–488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105 Gerling C, Wätzold F (2020) An economic evaluation framework for land‐use‐based conservation policy instruments in a changing climate. Conserv Biol cobi.13631. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13631 Hamaide B, Albers HJ, Busby G (2014) Backup coverage models in nature reserve site selection with spatial spread risk heterogeneity. Socioecon Plann Sci 48:158–167. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2014.03.003 Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142:14–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006 Hily E, Garcia S, Stenger A, Tu G (2015) Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a biodiversity conservation policy: A bio-econometric analysis of Natura 2000 contracts in forest. Ecol Econ 119:197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.008 Hily E, Wätzold F, Drechsler M (2017) Cost-effectiveness of conservation payment schemes under climate change. Jones KR, Watson JEM, Possingham HP, Klein CJ (2016) Incorporating climate change into spatial conservation prioritisation: A review. Biol Conserv 194:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.008 Juutinen A, Mäntymaa E, Mönkkönen M, Svento R (2008) Voluntary agreements in protecting privately owned forests in Finland — To buy or to lease? For Policy Econ 10:230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.10.005 Kuhfuss L, Preget R, Thoyer S, et al (2016) Nudges, Social Norms, and Permanence in Agri-environmental Schemes. Land Econ 92:641–655. doi: 10.3368/le.92.4.641 Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ, Nelson E, Polasky S (2011) The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss. Resour Energy Econ 33:192–211. Mallory ML, Ando AW (2014) Implementing efficient conservation portfolio design. Resour Energy Econ 38:1–18. doi: 10.1016/J.RESENEECO.2014.05.001 Muradian R, Rival L (2012) Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 1:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009 Petersen AH, Strange N, Anthon S, et al (2016) Conserving what, where and how? Cost-efficient measures to conserve biodiversity in Denmark. J Nat Conserv 29:33–44. doi: 10.1016/J.JNC.2015.10.004 Reside AE, Briscoe NJ, Dickman CR, et al (2019) Persistence through tough times: fixed and shifting refuges in threatened species conservation. Biodivers Conserv 28:1303–1330. doi: 10.1007/s10531-019-01734-7 Reside AE, Butt N, Adams VM (2018) Adapting systematic conservation planning for climate change. Biodivers Conserv 27:1–29. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1442-5 Schöttker O, Johst K, Drechsler M, Wätzold F (2016) Land for biodiversity conservation — To buy or borrow? Ecol Econ 129:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.011 Schöttker O, Santos MJ (2019) Easement or public land? An economic analysis of different ownership modes for nature conservation measures in California. Conserv Lett e12647. doi: 10.1111/conl.12647 Schöttker O, Wätzold F (2018) Buy or lease land? Cost-effective conservation of an oligotrophic lake in a Natura 2000 area. Biodivers Conserv 27:1327–1345. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1496-4 Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148. doi: 10.1038/nature02121 de Vries FP, Hanley N (2016) Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review. Environ Resour Econ 63:687–702. doi: 10.1007/s10640-015-9996-8 Wang X, Biewald A, Dietrich JP, et al (2016) Taking account of governance: Implications for land-use dynamics, food prices, and trade patterns. Ecol Econ 122:12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.018 Wätzold F, Drechsler M, Johst K, et al (2016) A Novel, Spatiotemporally Explicit Ecological-economic Modeling Procedure for the Design of Cost-effective Agri-environment Schemes to Conserve Biodiversity. Am J Agric Econ 98:489–512. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aav058 Wätzold F, Drechsler M (2014) Agglomeration payment, agglomeration bonus or homogeneous payment? Resour Energy Econ 37:85–101. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.011 Williamson OE (1998) Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. Economist (Leiden) 146:23–58. Williamson OE (1989) Transaction Cost Economics. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds) Handbook of Industrial Organization. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., pp 136–182 Zomer RJ, Xu J, Wang M, et al (2015) Projected impact of climate change on the effectiveness of the existing protected area network for biodiversity conservation within Yunnan Province, China. Biol Conserv 184:335–345. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.01.031 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/113036 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Climate change and the cost-effective governance mode for biodiversity conservation. (deposited 18 Mar 2020 10:00)
- Climate change and the cost-effective governance mode for biodiversity conservation. (deposited 13 May 2022 08:04) [Currently Displayed]