Induced innovation, the distributive cycle, and the changing pattern of labour productivity cyclicality: a SVAR analysis for the US economy

Stamegna, Marco (2022): Induced innovation, the distributive cycle, and the changing pattern of labour productivity cyclicality: a SVAR analysis for the US economy.

Abstract

The empirical literature on induced technical change has explored the long-run relationship between real wages and labour productivity but still lacks an explicit treatment of the implications of the wage-productivity nexus for the business cycle. The present paper aims to fill this gap. By employing a four-dimensional structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) model for the US economy (1948-2019), we test an extended version of the Goodwin model that includes aggregate demand and decomposes the labour share into real wages and labour productivity. This paper adds to the existing literature in some respects. First, it contributes to the induced innovation literature, by showing that wage shocks have positive and persistent effects on labour productivity at business cycle frequencies. Second, it adds to the debate and empirical evidence on the distributive cycle. Impulse response functions show that, even when decomposing the labour share, empirical evidence supports the Goodwin pattern, although the profit-led regime turns out to be driven more by technology than distributive shocks. Finally, we address two relevant cyclical stylized facts of the US economy: since the mid-1980s, the procyclical pattern of labour productivity has vanished, and real wages have no longer been correlated with employment over the business cycle. We explore the hypothesis that the two changes are linked. In light of the theory of induced innovation, we argue that the decline in the cyclical correlation between output and labour productivity can be explained by a lessened incentive to invest in labour-saving innovations due to missing wage growth in the upturn of the business cycle. Impulse response functions qualitatively support this intuition.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Labour productivity; endogenous technical change; income distribution; SVAR
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles

References

Antenucci, F., Deleidi, M., and Paternesi Meloni, W. (2020), “Kaldor 3.0: An empirical investigation of the Verdoorn-augmented technical progress function”, Review of Political Economy, 32(1): 49-76.

Araujo, R.A., Dávila-Fernández, M.J., and Moreira, H.N. (2019), “Some new insights on the empirics of Goodwin’s growth-cycle model”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51: 42-54.

Barbosa-Filho, N.H. and Taylor, L. (2006), “Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy – A structuralist Goodwin model”, Metroeconomica, 57(3): 389-411.

Barnichon, R. (2010), “Productivity and unemployment over the business cycle”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 57: 1013-1025.

Barrales-Ruiz, J., Mendieta-Muñoz, I., Rada, C., Tavani, D., and von Arnim, R. (2021), “The distributive cycle: Evidence and current debates”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 36(2): 468-503.

Basu, D., Chen, Y., and Oh, J.-S. (2013), “Class struggle and economic fluctuations: VAR analysis of the post-war U.S. economy”, International Review of Applied Economics, 27(5): 575-596.

Basu, D. and Gautham, L. (2019), “What is the impact of an exogenous shock to the wage share? VAR results for the US economy, 1973-2018”, UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers, n. 2019-08.

Basu, S. (1996), “Procyclical productivity: increasing returns or cyclical utilization?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3): 719-751.

Basu, S. and Fernald, J.G. (2001), “Why is productivity procyclical? Why do we care?”, in Hulten, C.R., Dean, E.R., and Harper (eds.), New development in productivity analysis, M.J. Chicago, University Chicago Press: 224-296.

Basu, S., Fernald, J.G., and Kimball, M.S. (2006), “Are technology improvements contractionary?”, American Economic Review, 96(5): 1418-1448.

Basu, S. and Kimball, M.S. (1997), “Cyclical productivity with unobserved input variation”, National bureau of economic research, Working Paper, n. 5915.

Bhaduri, A. and Marglin, S. (1990), “Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4): 375-393.

Blecker, R.A. (2016), “Wage-led versus profit-led demand regimes: the long and the short of it”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 4(4): 373-390.

Cauvel, M. (2019), “The neo-Goodwinian model reconsidered”, Post-Keynesian Economics Society, Working Paper, n. 1915.

Charpe, M., Bridji, S., and McAdam, P. (2019), “Labor share and growth in the long run”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24(7): 1720-1757.

Christiano, L.J., Eichenbaum, M., and Evans, C.L. (1999), “Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what end?”, Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1, Part A: 65-148.

Conti, A.M., Guglielminetti, E., and Riggi, M. (2019), “Labour productivity and the wageless recovery”, Bank of Italy, Temi di discussione (Working Papers), n. 1257.

Daly, M.C., Fernald, J.G., Jordà, Ò., and Necchio, F. (2015), “Output and unemployment dynamics”, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper, n. 2013-32.

Dávila-Fernández, M.J. (2020), “Alternative approaches to technological change in a small open economy”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30: 279-317.

De Souza, J.P.A. (2017), “Real wages and labor-saving technical change: evidence from a panel of manufacturing industries in mature and labor-surplus economies”, International Review of Applied Economics, 31(2): 151-172.

Desai, M. (1984), “An econometric model of the share of wages in national income: UK 1855-1965”, in Goodwin, R.M., Krüger, M., and Vercelli, A. (eds.), Nonlinear models of fluctuating growth. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol. 228, Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 253-277.

Fernald, J.G. and Wang, J.C. (2016), “Why has the cyclicality of productivity changed? What does it mean?”, Annual Review of Economics, 8: 465-496.

Fiebiger, B. (2022), “An evaluation of neo-Kaleckian supermultiplier and neo-Goodwinian models: pseudo-Goodwin cycles, external markets and pro-cyclical labour productivity”, FMM Working Paper, n. 78.

Foley, D.K. (2003), “Endogenous technical change with externalities in a classical growth model”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52(2): 167-189.

Foley, D.K., Michl, T.R., and Tavani, D. (2019), Growth and distribution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Galí, J. and Gambetti, L. (2009), “On the sources of the Great Moderation”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(1): 26-57.

Galí, J. and Gambetti, L. (2019), “Has the U.S. wage Phillips curve flattened? A semi-structural exploration”, National bureau of economic research, Working Paper, n. 25476.

Galí, J., López-Salido, J.D., and Vallés, J. (2003), “Technology shocks and monetary policy: assessing the Fed’s performance”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50: 723-743.

Galí, J. and van Rens, T. (2021), “The vanishing procyclicality of labour productivity”, The Economic Journal, 131: 302-326.

Garin, J, Pries, M.J., and Sims, E.R. (2018), “The relative importance of aggregate and sectoral shocks and the changing nature of economic fluctuations”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(1): 119-148.

Goodwin, R. (1967), “A growth cycle”, in Feinstein, C. (ed.), Socialism, capitalism, and economic growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 54-58.

Gordon, R.J. (2010), “Okun’s law and productivity innovations”, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 100: 11-15.

Harvie, D. (2000), “Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(3): 349-376.

Julius, A. J., (2005), “Steady-state growth and distribution with an endogenous direction of technical change”, Metroeconomica, 56(1): 101-125.

Kennedy, C. (1964), “Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution”, Economic Journal, 74(295): 541-547.

Kiefer, D., Mendieta-Muñoz, I., Rada, C., and von Arnim, R. (2020), “Secular stagnation and income distribution dynamics”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 52(2): 189-207.

Kiefer, D. and Rada, C. (2015), “Profit maximising goes global: the race to the bottom”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39: 1333-1350.

Kuttner, K. and Robinson, T. (2010), “Understanding the flattening Phillips curve”, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 21(2): 110-125.

Lavoie, M. (2017), “The origins and evolution of the debate on wage-led and profit-led regimes”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 14(2): 200-221.

Li, M. and Mendieta-Muñoz, I. (2020), “Are long-run output growth rates falling?”, Metroeconomica, 71(1): 204-234.

Lütkepohl, H. (2005), New introduction to multiple time series analysis, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Luzuriaga, M.C. and Tavani, D. (2021), “Classical political economy and secular stagnation”, FMM Working Paper, n. 71.

Marglin, S.A. and Bhaduri, A. (1990), “Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory”, in Marglin, S.A. and Schor, J.B. (eds.), The golden age of capitalism: Reinterpreting the postwar experience, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 153-186.

Marquetti, A. (2004), “Do rising real wages increase the rate of labor-saving technical change? Some econometric evidence”, Metroeconomica, 55(4): 432-441.

Mendieta-Muñoz, I., Rada, C., Santetti, M., and von Arnim, R. (2020), “The US labor share of income: what shocks matter?”, Review of Social Economy, 1-36.

Mohun, S. and Veneziani, R. (2008), “Goodwin cycles and the U.S. economy, 1948-2004”, in Flaschel, P. and Landesmann, M. (eds.), Mathematical economics and the dynamics of capitalism, New York: Routledge.

Nikiforos, M. and Foley, D. (2012), “Distribution and capacity utilization: conceptual issues and empirical evidence”, Metroeconomica, 63(1): 200-229.

Nikiforos, M., Santetti, M., and von Arnim, R. (2021), “The Sraffian supermultiplier and cycles: Theory and empirics”, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Working Paper, n. 993.

Nucci, F. and Riggi, M. (2011), “Performance pay and shifts in macroeconomic correlations”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37: 2796-813.

Ohanian, L.E. and Raffo, A.R. (2012), “Aggregate hours worked in OECD countries: New measurement and implications for business cycles”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 59(1): 40-56.

Petach, L. and Tavani, D. (2020), “Income shares, secular stagnation and the long-run distribution of wealth”, Metroeconomica, 71(1): 235-255.

Rada, C. (2012), “Social security tax and endogenous technical change in an economy with an aging population”, Metroeconomica, 63(4): 727-756.

Rada, C., Santetti, M., Schiavone, A., von Arnim, R. (2021), “Post-Keynesian vignettes on secular stagnation: From labor suppression to natural growth”, University of Utah, Department of Economics, n. 2021-05.

Ratner, D. and Sim, J. (2022), “Who killed the Phillips curve? A murder mystery”, FEDS Working Paper, n. 2022-28.

Roberts, J. (2006), “Monetary policy and inflation dynamics”, International Journal of Central Banking, 2(3): 193-230.

Samuelson, P. (1965), “A theory of induced innovation along Kennedy-Weizsäcker lines”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(4): 343-356.

Santetti, M. (n.d.), “Growth, cycles, and residential investment”: https://marcio.rbind.io/jmp/ Santetti_GCRI.pdf .

Setterfield, M. (2005), “Worker insecurity and U.S. macroeconomic performance during the 1990s”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 37(2): 155-177.

Setterfield, M. (2021), “Whatever happened to the ‘Goodwin pattern’? Profit squeeze dynamics in the modern American labour market”, Review of Political Economy, 1-21.

Shah, A. and Desai, M.J. (1981), “Growth cycles with induced technical change”, Economic Journal, 91(364): 1006-1010.

Sims, C.A. (1980), “Macroeconomics and reality”, Econometrica, 48(1): 1-48.

Stiroh, K.J. (2009), “Volatility accounting: a production perspective on increased economic stability”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(4): 671-696.

Tavani, D. (2012), “Wage bargaining and induced technical change in a linear economy: Model and application to the US (1963–2003)”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(2): 117-126.

Tavani, D. (2013), “Bargaining over productivity and wages when technical change is induced: implications for growth, distribution, and employment”, Journal of Economics, 109: 207-244.

Tavani, D. and Zamparelli, L. (2018), “Endogenous technical change in alternative theories of growth and distribution”, in Veneziani, R. and Zamparelli, L. (eds.), Analytical political economy, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell: 139-174.

van der Ploeg, F. (1987), “Growth cycles, induced technical change, and perpetual conflict over the distribution of income”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 9(1): 1-12.

van Rens, T. (2012), “How important is the intensive margin of labor adjustment? Discussion of “Aggregate hours worked in OECD countries: New measurement and implications for business cycles” by Lee Ohanian and Andrea Raffo”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 59(1): 57-63.

von Arnim, R. and Barrales, J. (2015), “Demand-driven Goodwin cycles with Kaldorian and Kaleckian features”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 3(3): 351-373.

Wang, J.C. (2014), “Vanishing procyclicality of productivity? Industry evidence”, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Working Paper, n. 14-15.

Zamparelli, L. (2015), “Induced innovation, endogenous technical change and income distribution in a labor-constrained model of classical growth”, Metroeconomica, 66(2): 243-262.

Zipperer, B. and Skott, P. (2011), “Cyclical patterns of employment, utilization, and profitability”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(1): 25-57.