Cao, Yiran and Chen, Yongmin and Ding, Yucheng and Zhang, Tianle (2022): Search and competition in expert markets.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_114170.pdf Download (515kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We develop a model in which consumers sequentially search experts for recommendations and prices to treat a problem, and experts simultaneously compete in these two dimensions. Consumers have either zero or a positive search cost. In equilibrium, experts may "cheat" by recommending an unnecessary treatment with positive probabilities, prices follow distributions that depend on a consumer's problem type and the treatment, and consumers search with Bayesian belief updating about their problem types. Remarkably, as search cost decreases, both expert cheating and prices can increase stochastically. However, if search cost is sufficiently small, competition forces all experts to behave honestly.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Search and competition in expert markets |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | search, experts, competition, credence good |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance |
Item ID: | 114170 |
Depositing User: | Tianle Zhang |
Date Deposited: | 15 Aug 2022 02:23 |
Last Modified: | 15 Aug 2022 02:23 |
References: | Alger, I., & Salanie, F. (2006). A Theory of Fraud and Overtreatment in Experts Markets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(4), 853-881. Anderson, S. P., & Renault, R. (1999). Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond model. The RAND Journal of Economics, 719-735. Bagwell, K., & Riordan, M. H. (1991). High and Declining Prices Signal Product Quality. American Economic Review, 81(1), 224-239. Balafoutas, L., & Kerschbamer, R. (2020). Credence Goods in the Literature: What the Past Fifteen Years Have Taught Us About Fraud, Incentives, and the Role of Institutions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 26, 100285. Bar-Isaac, H., Caruana, G., & Cuñat, V. (2012). Search, Design, and Market Structure. American Economic Review, 102(2), 1140-60. Bester, H., & Dahm, M. (2018). Credence Goods, Costly Diagnosis and Subjective Evaluation. The Economic Journal, 128(611), 1367-1394. Chen, Y., & Zhang, T. (2011). Equilibrium Price Dispersion with Heterogeneous Searchers. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(6), 645-654. Chen, Y., & Zhang, T. (2018). Entry and Welfare in Search Markets. The Economic Journal, 128(608), 55-80. Chen, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). Efficient Liability in Expert Markets. International Economic Review, forthcoming. Chen, Y., Li, Z., & Zhang, T. (2022). Experience Goods and Consumer Search. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14(3), 591-621. Choi, M., Dai, A. Y., & Kim, K. (2018). Consumer Search and Price Competition. Econometrica, 86(4), 1257-1281. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67-88. Dulleck, U., & Kerschbamer, R. (2006). On Doctors, Mechanics, and Computer Specialists: The Economics of Credence Goods. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 5-42. Dulleck, U., Kerschbamer, R., & Sutter, M. (2011). The Economics of Credence goods: An Experiment on the Role of Liability, Verifiability, Reputation, and Competition. American Economic Review, 101(2), 526-55. Emons, W. (1997). Credence Goods and Fraudelent Experts. RAND Journal of Economics, 28(1), 107-119. Emons, W. (2001). Credence Coods Monopolists. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(3-4), 375-389. Fong, Y. F. (2005). When Do Experts Cheat and Whom Do They Target?. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 113-130. Fong, Y. F., Liu, T., & Meng, X. (2022). Trust Building in Credence Goods Markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14(1), 490-528. Haan, M. A., & Moraga-González, J. L. (2011). Advertising for Attention in a Consumer Search Model. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 552-579. Janssen, M., Pichler, P., & Weidenholzer, S. (2011). Oligopolistic Markets with Sequential Search and Production Cost Uncertainty. RAND Journal of Economics, 42(3), 444-470. Liu, T. (2011). Credence Goods Markets with Conscientious and Selfish Experts. International Economic Review, 52(1), 227-244. Liu, T., & Ma, A. (2021). Equilibrium Information in Credence Goods, working paper. Moraga-González, J. L., Sándor, Z., & Wildenbeest, M. R. (2017). Prices and Heterogeneous Search Costs. RAND Journal of Economics, 48(1), 125-146. Moraga-González, J. L., & Sun, Y. (2022). Product Quality and Consumer Search. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, forthcoming. Pesendorfer, W., & Wolinsky, A. (2003). Second Opinions and Price Competition: Inefficiency in the Market for Expert Advice. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 417-437. Pitchik, C., & Schotter, A. (1987). Honesty in a Model of Strategic Information Transmission. American Economic Review, 77(5), 1032-1036. Rhodes, A. (2011). Can prominence matter even in an almost frictionless market? The Economic Journal, 121(556), F297-F308. Schneider, H. S. (2012). Agency Problems and Reputation in Expert Services: Evidence from Auto Repair. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 60(3), 406-433. Stahl, D. (1989). Oligopolistic Pricing with Sequential Consumer Search. American Economic Review, 79(4), 700-712. Stigler, G. J. (1961). The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213-225. Taylor, C. R. (1995). The Economics of Breakdowns, Checkups, and Cures. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 53-74. Wolinsky, A. (1986). True Monopolistic Competition as a Result of Imperfect Information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(3), 493-511. Wolinsky, A. (1993). Competition in a Market for Informed Experts' Services. RAND Journal of Economics, 24(3), 380-398. Wolinsky, A. (1995). Competition in Markets for Credence Goods. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 151, 117-131. Zhou, J. (2014). Multiproduct Search and the Joint Search Effect. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2918-39. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/114170 |