Goto, Tsuyoshi (2022): Do municipal mergers reduce public expenditure? Evidence from the MTE approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_114376.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study examines whether municipal mergers reduce public expenditure by examining the marginal treatment effect (MTE) of municipal mergers. Extant papers in the literature have paid little attention to bias from self-selection among municipal mergers or to heterogeneity in the treatment effects of the mergers. Corresponding to these issues, we use the instrumental variables used in Miyazaki (2018) [Applied Economics, 50(10), pp. 1108-1121] and estimate the MTEs of the mergers. From the estimated MTEs, we construct several estimands, and we show that the municipal mergers resulted in an increase in public expenditure on average. Moreover, we confirm that the local average treatment effect (LATE) was quite large from FY2006 to FY2015, although it decreased suddenly in FY2016, when some incentives that promoted the mergers ended. This implies that the incentives offered by the national government negated the cost reductions resulting from the municipal mergers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Do municipal mergers reduce public expenditure? Evidence from the MTE approach |
English Title: | Do municipal mergers reduce public expenditure? Evidence from the MTE approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Marginal treatment effect; Municipal merger; Cost reduction |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H73 - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession |
Item ID: | 114376 |
Depositing User: | Tsuyoshi Goto |
Date Deposited: | 09 Sep 2022 08:01 |
Last Modified: | 09 Sep 2022 08:01 |
References: | Alesina, A., and E. Spolaore (1997): “On the number and size of nations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1027–1056. Blesse, S., and T. Baskaran (2016): “Do municipal mergers reduce costs? Evidence from a German federal state,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 59, 54–74. Bolton, P., and G. Roland (1997): “The breakup of nations: a political economy analysis,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1057–1090. Brinch, C. N., M. Mogstad, and M. Wiswall (2017): “Beyond LATE with a discrete instrument,” Journal of Political Economy, 125(4), 985–1039. Chabe-Ferret, S. (2022): Statistical tools for causal inference.Webbook, https://chabefer.github.io/STCI/. Dur, R., and K. Staal (2008): “Local Public Good Provision, Municipal Consolidation, and National Transfers,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(2), 160–173. Eisenhauer, P., J. J. Heckman, and E. Vytlacil (2015): “The Generalized Roy Model and the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs,” Journal of Political Economy, 123(2), 413–443. Ellingsen, T. (1998): “Externalities vs Internalities: A Model of Political Integration,” Journal of Public Economics, 68(2), 251–268. Heckman, J. J., and E. Vytlacil (2005): “Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Econometric Policy Evaluation1,” Econometrica, 73(3), 669–738. Heckman, J. J., and E. J. Vytlacil (1999): “Local Instrumental Variables and Latent Variable Models for Identifying and Bounding Treatment Effects,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(8), 4730–4734. Heckman, J. J., and E. J. Vytlacil (2007): “Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part II: Using the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Econometric Estimators to Evaluate Social Programs, and to Forecast their Effects in New Environments,” in Handbook of Econometrics, ed. by J. J. Heckman, and E. E. Leamer, vol. 6, chap. Chapter 71, pp. 4875–5143. Elsevier. Ministry of Internal affairs and Communications (2002): “Calculation of LAT amount in FY2002 ’Heisei 14 nendo Futsu koufuzei no santeikekka tou’ in Japanese,” https://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_news/s-news/2002/020726_6.html. Ministry of Internal affairs and Communications (2016): “Transition of the number of municipalities ’Shichoson Su No Suiihyo’ in Japanese,” http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000283329.pdf. Miyazaki, T. (2018): “Examining the relationship between municipal consolidation and cost reduction: an instrumental variable approach,” Applied Economics, 50(10), 1108–1121. Mogstad, M., A. Santos, and A. Torgovitsky (2018): “Using Instrumental Variables for Inference About Policy Relevant Treatment Parameters,” Econometrica, 86(5), 1589–1619. Tricaud, C. (2021): “Better Alone? Evidence on the Costs of Intermunicipal Cooperation,” CESifo Working Paper Series, (9000). Weese, E. (2015): “Political mergers as coalition formation: An analysis of the Heisei municipal amalgamations,” Quantitative Economics, 6(2), 257–307. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/114376 |