The macroeconomics of establishing a basic income grant in South Africa

Steenkamp, Daan and Havemann, Roy and Hollander, Hylton (2022): The macroeconomics of establishing a basic income grant in South Africa. Published in: Economic Research South Africa Working Paper , Vol. 881,

Abstract

This paper quantifies the effect of fiscal transfers on the trade-off between social relief and debt accumulation, and discusses the economic growth and fiscal implications of different combinations of expanded social support and funding choices. Given South Africa’s already high level of public debt, the opportunity to fund a basic income grant through higher debt is limited. Using a general equilibrium model, the paper shows that extending the social relief of distress grant could be fiscally feasible provided taxes rise to fund such a programme. Implementing such a policy would, however, have a contractionary impact on the economy. A larger basic income grant (even at the level of the food poverty line) would threaten fiscal sustainability as it would require large tax increases that would crowd-out consumption and investment. The model results show that sustainably expanding social transfers requires structurally higher growth, which necessitates growth-enhancing reforms that crowd-in the private sector through, for example, relieving the energy constraint, increasing government infrastructure investment and expanding employment programmes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Universal basic income, DSGE, fiscal sustainability
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt

References

Aizenman, J. and Y. Jinjarak (2012). Income inequality, tax base and sovereign spreads. Technical Report 18176, National Bureau of Economic Research. Alesina, A. and D. Rodrik (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics 109(2), 465–490. Andreasen, E., G. Sandleris, and A. Van der Ghote (2019). The political economy of sovereign defaults. Journal of Monetary Economics 104, 23–36. Applied Development Research Solutions (2021). Fiscally neutral basic income grant scenarios: Economic and development impacts. ADR Policy Brief May. Banerjee, A. V. and E. Duflo (2003). Inequality and growth: What can the data say? Journal of economic growth 8(3), 267–299. Benabou, R. (2000). Unequal societies: Income distribution and the social contract. American Economic Review 90(1), 96–129. Berg, A. and J. Sachs (1988). The debt crisis structural explanations of country performance. Journal of Development Economics 29(3), 271–306. Bhorat, H. and T. Köhler (2020, October). Social assistance during South Africa’s national lockdown: Examining the COVID-19 grant, changes to the Child Support Grant, and postOctober policy options. Working Papers 202009, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit. Bhorat, H. and T. Köhler (2021). How the COVID-19 grant has reached the once forgotten. Working papers, Econ 3x3. Bohn, H. (1995, February). The Sustainability of Budget Deficits in a Stochastic Economy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27(1), 257–271. Bohn, H. (1998). The Behavior of U. S. Public Debt and Deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(3), 949–963. Bohn, H. (2007, October). Are stationarity and cointegration restrictions really necessary for the intertemporal budget constraint? Journal of Monetary Economics 54(7), 1837–1847. Bohn, H. (2011). The Economic Consequences of Rising U.S. Government Debt: Privileges at Risk. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 67(3), 282–302. 54