Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye?

Segovia, Michelle and Palma, Marco and Lusk, Jayson L. and Drichoutis, Andreas (2022): Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye?

Abstract

We explore the effect of different presentation formats on elicitation of risk preferences using a popular probability-varying task (Holt and Laury, 2002} and a payoff-varying task (Drichoutis and Lusk, 2016). The presentation formats use horizontal bars that vary either the width or height of the bars (or both at the same time) to potentially help subjects in judging how large or small probabilities and monetary amounts are in a given choice task. These graphical formats are compared to a text only format. We complement our data collection with eye-tracking data that enriches our structural models with additional information regarding how visual attention and engagement vary with the presented information. While we find no statistically significant effects of presentation formats on elicited parameters for risk preferences, we find that eye-tracking information not only is associated with preference parameters, but it also changes the inferences with respect to which decision theory better fits our data.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: risk; Individual decision making; visual attention; eye tracking
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness

References

Aimone, J. A., S. Ball, and B. King-Casas (2016). It's not what you see but how you see it: Using eye-tracking to study the risky decision-making process. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 9 (3-4), 137.

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2013). Discounting behavior and the magnitude effect. Economica 80 (320), 670-697.

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2006). Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics 9 (4), 383-405.

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76 (3), 583-618.

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2014). Discounting behavior: A reconsideration. European Economic Review 71, 15-33.

Arieli, A., Y. Ben-Ami, and A. Rubinstein (2011). Tracking decision makers under uncertainty. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3 (4), 68-76.

Barrafrem, K. and J. Hausfeld (2020). Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation. Journal of Economic Psychology 77, 102188.

Bauermeister, G.-F. and O. Mubhoff (2019). Multiple switching behaviour in different display formats of multiple price lists. Applied Economics Letters 26 (1), 58-63.

Benjamin, D. J., S. A. Brown, and J. M. Shapiro (2013). Who is `behavioral'? cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (6), 1231-1255.

Brown, A. L. and P. J. Healy (2018). Separated decisions. European Economic Review 101, 20-34.

Bruner, D. M. (2011). Multiple switching behaviour in multiple price lists. Applied Economics Letters 18 (5), 417-420.

Charness, G., U. Gneezy, and A. Imas (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 87, 43-51.

Charness, G., A. Viceisza, et al. (2016). Three risk-elicitation methods in the field: Evidence from rural Senegal. Review of Behavioral Economics 3 (2), 145-171.

Chiew, K. S. and T. S. Braver (2013). Temporal dynamics of motivation-cognitive control interactions revealed by high-resolution pupillometry. Frontiers in psychology 4, 15.

Cokely, E. T. and C. M. Kelley (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation.

de Gee, J. W., T. Knapen, and T. H. Donner (2014). Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (5), E618-E625.

Deck, C., J. Lee, and J. Reyes (2014). Investing versus gambling: experimental evidence of multi-domain risk attitudes. Applied economics letters 21 (1), 19-23.

Drichoutis, A. C. and J. L. Lusk (2016). What can multiple price lists really tell us about risk preferences? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 53 (2), 89-106.

Friedman, D., S. Habib, D. James, and B. Williams (2022). Varieties of risk preference elicitation. Games and Economic Behavior 133, 58-76.

Habib, S., D. Friedman, S. Crockett, and D. James (2017). Payoff and presentation modulation of elicited risk preferences in MPLs. Journal of the Economic Science Association 3 (2), 183-194.

Harrison, G. W., E. Johnson, M. M. McInnes, and E. E. Rutstrom (2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: Comment. The American Economic Review 95 (3), 897-901.

Harrison, G. W. and E. E. Rutstrom (2009). Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics 12 (2), 133-158.

Harrison, G. W. and J. T. Swarthout (2019). Eye-tracking and economic theories of choice under risk. Journal of the Economic Science Association 5 (1), 26-37.

Hey, J. and W. Zhou (2014). Do past decisions influence future decisions? Applied Economics Letters 21 (3), 152-157.

Hirschauer, N., O. Musshoff, S. C. Maart-Noelck, and S. Gruener (2014). Eliciting risk attitudes-how to avoid mean and variance bias in Holt-and-Laury lotteries. Applied Economics Letters 21 (1), 35-38.

Holt, C. A. and S. K. Laury (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review 92 (5), 1644-1655.

Kee, J., M. Knuth, J. N. Lahey, and M. A. Palma (2021). Does eye-tracking have an effect on economic behavior? PlosOne 16 (8), e0254867.

Leevy-Garboua, L., H. Maafi, D. Masclet, and A. Terracol (2012). Risk aversion and framing effects. Experimental Economics 15 (1), 128-144.

Norwood, B. F., M. C. Roberts, and J. L. Lusk (2004). Ranking crop yield models using out-of sample likelihood functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (4), 1032-1043.

Papoutsaki, A., J. Laskey, and J. Huang (2017). Searchgazer: Webcam eye tracking for remote studies of web search. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval (CHIIR). ACM.

Papoutsaki, A., P. Sangkloy, J. Laskey, N. Daskalova, J. Huang, and J. Hays (2016). Webgazer: Scalable webcam eye tracking using user interactions. In Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 3839-3845. AAAI.

Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (4), 323-343.

Reynaud, A. and S. Couture (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and decision 73 (2), 203-221.

Rommel, J., D. Hermann, M. Muller, and O. Mubhoff (2017). Comprehension in risk elicitation experiments. Applied Economics Letters 24 (9), 627-634.

Schley, D. R. and E. Peters (2014). Assessing "economic value" symbolic-number mappings predict risky and riskless valuations. Psychological science 25 (3), 753-761.

Sirois, S. and J. Brisson (2014). Pupillometry. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5 (6), 679-692.

StataCorp (2013). Stata user's guide release 13. College Station, Texas, USA: Stata Press.

Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4), 297-323.

Wilcox, N. (2008). Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: A critical primer and econometric comparison. In J. C. Cox and G. W. Harrison (Eds.), Research in Experimental Economics Vol 12: Risk Aversion in Experiments, pp. 197-292. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Wilcox, N. T. (2011). 'Stochastically more risk averse:' A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk. Journal of Econometrics 162 (1), 89-104.

Zhou, W. and J. Hey (2018). Context matters. Experimental economics 21 (4), 723-756.