Can BRI be the Road to Peace and Prosperity?

Khan, Haider (2023): Can BRI be the Road to Peace and Prosperity?

Abstract

The debate about the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the west seems to have reached an impasse. At least three issues require sustained analysis. These are: 1. Trade, investment and growth prospects both in PRC and other countries, but particularly in the Global South; 2. Distributional issues and the possibilities of advancing arrangements that can enhance people’s well-being in various BRI countries; 3. The geopolitical consequences and how to avoid a new cold war. On the trade and investment side, BRI promises to create a multilateral trading and investment area under Chinese leadership. Both preexisting US hostility and fears generated by such prospects summed up under the paranoid term “China’s Sharp Power”, have given BRI a bad press in the west in the absence of any model-based scientific analysis. In order to assess the impact of BRI using consequentialist logic, it is desirable to have model-based counterfactual results. In order to lend concreteness to a Geoeconomic and Geopolitical analysis of BRI, this short article presents some results from a regional economy wide model developed by the author. Aggregate consequences for the Chinese economy in terms of economic growth, output and employment impacts are estimated for two BRI scenarios—a high investment and demand scenario and the current low investment and demand scenario. Some important dynamic econometric issues are discussed in an appendix of the paper on which this section is based. Also, a more complex economic systems model with explicit banking and financial sectors for the Chinese economy is presented for further, more sophisticated modeling work can be found in the same technical paper. As a first approximation, the current modeling results show that BRI will certainly not harm the Chinese economy; but the low demand scenario does not translate into great gains either. The high demand longer term scenario is much more attractive for the economic policymakers in China. But for the global south---particularly Africa--- prospects for a new deal is there. Achieving a more equitable distribution and enhancing the capabilities of the great majority of people there will require favorable political conditions. While the Chinese do not try to promote democracy, they also do not try to overthrow existing governments. Therefore, progressive political forces of the global south need to organize around a pro-people political, social and economic agenda. Finally, in the sphere of international relations, even in the instance the economic consequences alone cannot justify the strategic importance given to BRI by the Chinese rulers, or perhaps especially in that situation, the prospects for a new cold war are real. One possible conclusion is that although the original investment impetus came largely from balance of payment surplus, excess capacity in PRC and the profit seeking by its private sector firms, by now the geopolitical motives are the main drivers of BRI with modest prospects of economic gains but real prospects of energy security and overall trade and investment security. But this is a delicate and fraught game in geoeconomics and geopolitics in the 21st century. So far, the US response lacks subtlety and nuance . Such responses fueled by fear and insecurity on the part of the US can lead to a dangerous geopolitical conflict.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: Belt and Road Initiative, China, East Asia, The Global South, Africa, Input-Output Matrix,Social Accounting Matrix, Finance, Trade and Geopolitics, Economic Impact Modeling and Analysis, Sharp Power.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F53 - International Agreements and Observance ; International Organizations; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights

References

Aoyama, Rumi. 2016. “One Belt, One Road”: China’s New Global Strategy,” Journal of Contemporary Asian Studies 5, no.2:3-22. doi: 10.1080/24761028.2016.11869094

Banerjee, Dipankar. 2016. “China’s One Belt One Road Initiative,” ISEAS 14, https://iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2016_14.pdf Callahan, William A. 2016. “China’s “Asia Dream”: The Belt Road Initiative and The New Regional Order,” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 1, no.3: 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116647806 Casarini, Nicola. 2015. “Is Europe to Benefit from China’s Belt and Road Initiative?” Instituto Affari Internazionali 15, no. 40. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1540.pdf

Chaisse, Julien, Matsushita, Mitsuo. 2018. “China’s ‘Belt And Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications,” Journal of World Trade 52, (1) : 163–185.

Chatzky, Andrew, and James McBride. 2019 “China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative,” Council On Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative Chen, Xikang. 2005.“Extending the Input-Output Model with Assets,” Economic Systems Research 17, (2): 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310500115074 Cheng, Leonard K. 2016. “Three questions on China’s “Belt and Road Initiative,” China Economic Review 40: 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.008

Clarke, Michael. 2017. “The Belt and Road Initiative: China’s New Grand Strategy?” Asia Policy 24: 71-79. Doi:10.1353/asp.2017.0023 Ding, Yibing, and Xiao Li. 2017. "The Past and Future of China’s Role in the East Asian Economy: A Trade Perspective." Canadian Public Policy / Analyse De Politiques 43, no. S2: S45-56. https://www-jstor-org.du.idm.oclc.org/stable/90003694.

Djankov, Simeon, Miner, Sean. (2016) “China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Motives, Scope and Challenges,” In PIIE Briefing. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://books.google.com/books?id=YbiqCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PT3&ots=83GIVl_Gbb&dq=belt%20road%20initiative&lr&pg=PT3#v=onepage&q&f=false

Du, Julan, Zhang, Yifei. 2018. “Does One Belt One Road Initiative Promote Chinese Overseas Direct Investment,” China Economic Review 47: 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.05.010

Du, Michael M. 2016. “China’s “One Belt, One Road” Initiative: Context, Focus, Institutions, and Implications,” The Chinese Journal of Global Governance 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1163/23525207-12340014 Fallon, Theresa. 2015. “The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping’s Grand Strategy for Eurasia,” American Foreign Policy Interests 37, no.3: 140-147. doi: 10.1080/10803920.2015.1056682

Ferdinand, Peter. 2016. “Westward ho—the China dream and ‘one belt, one road: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping,” International Affairs 92 (4): 941–957, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660

Horridge, Mark, Wittwer, Glyn. 2008. “SinoTERM, a multi-regional CGE model of China,” China Economic Review 19 (4): 628-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2008.05.002Get Hu, Biliang, Qingjie Liu, and Jiao Yan. 2017. "Promoting the Belt and Road Initiative by Strengthening ‘5 1’ Cooperation." In China's New Sources of Economic Growth: Human Capital, Innovation and Technological Change, edited by Song Ligang, Garnaut Ross, Fang Cai, and Johnston Lauren, 409-30. Australia: ANU Press. http://www.jstor.org.du.idm.oclc.org/stable/j.ctt1trkk3v.25.

Huang, Yiping. 2016. “Understanding China’s Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, Framework and Assesment,” China Economic Review 40: 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007

Hurley, John, Morris, Scott, Portelance, Gailyn. 2018. “Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective,” Center for Global Development 121. https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/examining-debt-implications-belt-and-road-initiative-policy-perspective.pdf

Judzik, D., H.A. Khan and L. Spagnlo, 2016. “Social Capabilities–Based Flexicurity for a Learning Economy,” Sage Economic and Labour Relations Review 27, no. 3: 333-348

Kang, C.C. and H.A. Khan. 2016. “Efficiency Evaluation of Bus Transit Firms with and without Consideration of Environmental Air-pollution Emissions,” Transportation Research (An Elsevier Science Journal) Part D.

Khan, Haider, A. 2022. When the Earth Trembled. Dhaka: Kathaprakash Publishing. --------------------.2021a. China as a 21st Century Rising Power and Possibilities of a Novel Multiplex IR: Prospects for Overcoming Thucydides’s Trap in Light of Neoclassical Realism in a Scientific Realist Framework. Discussion Paper. JKSIS, Denver, USA ---------------- 2021b. Avoiding Thucydides’s Trap: Geo-Strategy, Geo-Politics, Geo-Economy and National Security in a complex systems framework. Lecture at Virginia Military Institute on Nov. 15 Recorded version available on request from Prof. Patrick Rhamey of VMI.

----------------------2020 “Critical Macroeconomic and Multisectoral Perspectives on US Infrastructure: Challenges and Directions for the 21st Century.” In A. Khan and K. Becker eds. US Infrastructure: Challenges and Directions for the 21st Century, UK: Routledge: 136-161. —————2018a. “Development Orders and Disorders: Real Competition in Complex Global Capitalist System, China’s Ambiguous Case, and the Need for Democratic Socialism in the 21st Century”, Paper presented at the New School University, New York City, Jan. 30. --------------2018b. BRI: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in a Mathematial Model. Discussion Paper, JKSIS, Denver. —————2017a. “Challenges of Urbanization: Building Healthy Sustainable Smart and Resilient Cities,” Paper Presented at the British Academy Workshop on Smart Cities, July 12-15, Bradford University, UK. —————2017b. “A Strategy for Development as Freedom” In Robert Lensink, Stefan Sjogren and Clas Wihlborg eds. Paths for Sustainable Development, Gothenberg: University of Gothenberg, Sweden. —————2017c. “Macroeconomic Multisectoral Perspectives on US Infrastructure: Challenges and Directions for the 21st Century,” Discussion chapter, JKSIS, University of Denver, Denver, USA. —————2016. “On Capitalism and Racism”, E-International Relations, July 2016. ————— 2007.“Social Accounting Matrix: A Very Short Introduction for Modeling”, In Econ Papers: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/tkyfseres/2007cf477.htm (Accessed on Dec. 24, 2018) ————— 2004a. “On Mortality and Poverty: An Axiomatic Approach With A Modified Index”, Econ Papers, https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/tkyfseres/2004cf281.htm (Last visited on Dec.26,2018) ————— 2004b. Innovation and Growth in East Asia: The Future of Miracles. New York: Houndsmills and Macmillan/Palgrave ————— 2004c. Global Markets and Financial Crisis in Asia: Towards a Theory for the Twenty First Century. New York: Houndsmills and Macmillan/Palgrave ————— 2002. “Innovation and Growth in a Schumpeterian Model” Oxford Development Studies, 30, no. 3: 289-306. ————— 1998. Technology, Development and Democracy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. —————1997a. Technology, Energy and Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, ————— 1997b. “Ecology, Inequality and Poverty: The Case of Bangladesh” Asian Development Review, 15, no. 2. —————————— and F. Schettino. 2018. “Income Polarization in the USA: What Happened to the Middle Class in the Last Few Decades?” Econ Papers https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pramprapa/85554.htm ------------ and A. Gabriele. 2017. Polarization and the Middle Class in China: a Non-Parametric Evaluation Using CHNS and CHIP Data. Econ Papers https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pramprapa/85555.htm Khan, H. and E. Thorbecke.1988. Macroeconomic Effects and Diffusion of Alternative Technologies Within a Social Accounting Matrix Framework: The Case of Indonesia, U.K: Gower Publishing Co. Aldershot, ——————————————— 1989. “Macroeconomic Effects of Technology Choice: Multiplier and Structural Path Analysis”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 11, no.1.

Kong, Lingjie. 2015. “The Belt and Road Initiative and China’s Foreign Policy Towards Its Territorial and Boundary Disputes,” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 1, no.2: 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740015500165 Li, Jia. (2008) “The Financial Social Accounting Matrix for China, and its Application to a Multiplier Analysis.” Forum of International Development Studies 36: 215-239. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/8174

Min Ye.2020. The Belt, Road and Beyond: State-Mobilized Globalization in China 1998 — 2018 (Cambridge :Cambridge University Press) Murphy, David. (2016) "One Belt One Road: International Development Finance With Chinese Characteristics." In Pollution, edited by Davies Gloria, Goldkorn Jeremy, and Tomba Luigi, 245-52. Australia: ANU Press. http://www.jstor.org.du.idm.oclc.org/stable/j.ctt1rqc934.23.

National Bureau of Statistics. 2012. “Input-Output Tables of China,” In China Data Insight, China: China Statistics. http://cdi.cnki.net/Titles/SingleNJ?NJCode=N2016030122 Nie, Wenjuan. 2016 "Xi Jinping's Foreign Policy Dilemma: One Belt, One Road or the South China Sea?" Contemporary Southeast Asia 38, no. 3: 422-44. http://www.jstor.org.du.idm.oclc.org/stable/24916765.

Nordin, Astrid H. M., Weissmann, Mikael. 2018. “Will Trump make China great again? The belt and road initiative and international order,” International Affairs 94 (2):231–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix242

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. “Input-Out Tables,” Last Edited 2011. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IOTS

Ratner, Ely. 2018. “Geostrategic and Military Drivers and Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative,” Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/report/geostrategic-and- military-drivers-and-implications-belt-and-road-initiative

Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press. ——————1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press and New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. ——————1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz, Joseph. 2016. “How to Restore Equitable and Sustainable Economic Growth in the United States.” American Economic Review 106, no. 5 (2016) 43-47. ——————2013. The Price of Inequality, NY: W.W. Norton

Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., De Vries, G. J. 2015. “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Databases: the Case of Global Automotive Production,” Review of International Economics 23: 575-605. http://www.wiod.org/database/wiots16 Zhai, Fan, Zhi, Wang. “WTO Accession, Rural Labor Migration and Urban Development in China,” Urban Studies 29 (12): 2199-2217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000033827 Vangeli, Anastas. 2017. “China's Engagement with the Sixteen Countries of Central, East and Southeast Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative.” China & World Economy 25: 101-124. doi:10.1111/cwe.12216

Zhai, Fan. 2018. “China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Preliminary Quantitative Assessment.” Journal of Asian Economics 55: 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.006

Zhang, Lingge, Meifeng Luo, Dong Yang, and Kevin Li. 2018. “Impacts of Trade Liberalization on Chinese Economy with Belt and Road Initiative,” Maritime Policy Management 45, no. 3: 301-318. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1396504 Zhexin, Zhang. 2016. "China’s International Strategy and Its Implications for Southeast Asia." Southeast Asian Affairs: 55-66. https://www-jstor-org.du.idm.oclc.org/stable/26466918.