Elicited Time Preferences and Behavior in Long-Run Projects

AKIN, ZAFER and YAVAS, ABDULLAH (2023): Elicited Time Preferences and Behavior in Long-Run Projects.

Abstract

We study whether and how the experimentally elicited risk and time preferences of subjects are associated with their behavior in long-run projects. First, risk and time preferences are elicited from time-dated monetary choices to estimate a general discount and utility function at an individual level, then subjects work on a longitudinal project that requires effort in multiple periods. We find that present bias in the form of a fixed cost or variable cost (quasi-hyperbolic discounting) is not supported by monetary choices. Analyses of allocation patterns of work reveal that the estimated utility and discounting models are not compatible with the observed allocations. We find evidence of both present and future bias, although the former is more prevalent and severe, and subjects exhibit naivete in their choice reversals. Furthermore, discount rate and present bias parameters estimated based on monetary choices have predictive power on how work is allocated in the long-run project.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: time preferences, quasi-hyperbolic discounting, experiment, long-run project
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving

References

1.Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics. Cambridge University Press. 2.Ainslie, G., Herrnstein R.J. (1981). Preference Reversals and Delayed Enforcement. Animal Learning and Behavior , 9, 476-82. 3.Akin Z. (2012). Intertemporal Decision making with Present Biased Preferences. Journal of Economic Psy- chology, 33-1, 30-47. 4.Anderhub, V., Gneezy U., Gu¨th, W., Sonsino D. (2001). On the interaction of risk and time preferences: An experimental study. German Economic Review , 2(3), 239-253. 5.Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., Rutstr¨om, E. E. (2008). Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences. Econometrica 76 (3): 583–618. 6.Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., Rutstr¨om, E. E. (2014). Discounting behavior: A reconsideration. European Economic Review, 71, 15-33. 7.Angeletos, G. M., Laibson, D., Repetto, A., Tobacman, J., Weinberg, S. (2001). The hyperbolic consumption model: Calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation. Journal of Economic perspectives, 15(3), 47-68. 8.Ariely, D. and Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: self-control by precom- mitment. Psychological Science, 13, 219-224. 9.Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., Yin, W. (2006). Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 635-672. 10.Augenblick, N., Niederle, M., Sprenger, C. (2015). Working over time: Dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(3), 1067-1115. 11.Augenblick, N., Rabin, M. (2019). An experiment on time preference and misprediction in unpleasant tasks. Review of Economic Studies, 86(3), 941-975. 12.Benhabib J., Bisin A., Schotter A. (2010). Present-Bias, Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting and Fixed Costs. Games and Economic Behaviour , 69, 205-223. 13.Bhatia, S., Crawford, M. M., McDonald, R. L., Moreno, M. A., Read, D. (2021). Inconsistent Planning and the Allocation of Tasks Over Time. Working paper. 14.Bisin, A., Hyndman, K. (2020). Present-bias, procrastination and deadlines in a field experiment. Games and economic behavior, 119, 339-357. 15.Bradford, D., Courtemanche, C., Heutel, G., McAlvanah, P., Ruhm, C. (2017). Time preferences and consumer behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 55(2), 119-145. 16.Burger, N., Charness, G., Lynham, J. (2011). Field and online experiments on self-control. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 77(3), 393-404. 17.Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 537-579. 18.Casari, M. (2009). Pre-commitment and exibility in a time decision experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncer- tainty , 38(2), 117-41. 19.Casari, M., Dragone, D. (2015). Choice reversal without temptation: A dynamic experiment on time prefer- ences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 50(2), 119-140. 20.Chabris, C. F., Laibson, D., Morris, C. L., Schuldt, J. P., Taubinsky, D. (2008). Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. Journal of risk and uncertainty , 37(2), 237-269. 21.Caplin, A., Leahy, J. (2001). Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 55-79. 22.Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 771–791. 23.Charness, G., Garcia, T., Offerman, T., Villeval, M. C. (2020). Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 60(2), 99-123. 24.Cheung, S. L., Tymula, A., Wang, X. (2021). Quasi-hyperbolic present bias: A meta-analysis. Life Course Centre Working Paper, (2021-15). 25.Cohen, J., Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D., White, J. M. (2020). Measuring time preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 299-347. 26.Coller, M., Williams, M.B., (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics, 2, 107–127. 27.Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U. (2012). The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), 645-677. 28.Duflo, E., M. Kremer, and J. Robinson (2011). Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Evidence From Kenya. American Economic Review , 101(6), 2350-2390. 29.Ericson, K. M., White, J. M., Laibson, D., Cohen, J. D. (2015). Money earlier or later? Simple heuristics explain intertemporal choices better than delay discounting does. Psychological science, 26(6), 826-833. 30.Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D. (2019). Intertemporal choice. In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1 (Vol. 2, pp. 1-67). North-Holland. 31.Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 1645–1692. 32.Fernandez-Villaverde, J., Mukherji, A. (2002). Can we really observe hyperbolic discounting? Available at SSRN 306129. 33.Fischer, C., (1999). Read this paper even later: procrastination with time-inconsistent preferences. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 99-20. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. 34.Fischer, C. (2001), Read this paper later: procrastination with time-consistent preferences. Journal of Eco- nomic Behavior and Organization, 46, 249-69. 35.Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401. 36.Frederick S., Loewenstein G. (2002). The Psychology of Sequence Preferences. Working Paper, Sloan School, MIT. 37.Freeman, D., Manzini, P., Mariotti, M., Mittone, L. (2016). Procedures for eliciting time preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 126, 235-242. 38.Galizzi, M. M., Machado, S. R., Miniaci, R. (2016). Temporal stability, cross-validity, and external validity of risk preferences measures: Experimental evidence from a UK representative sample. 39.Golsteyn, B. H., Gronqvist, H., Lindahl, L. (2014). Adolescent time preferences predict lifetime outcomes. The Economic Journal , 124(580), F739-F761. 40.Halevy, Y. (2015). Time Consistency: Stationarity and Time Invariance. Econometrica 83(1): 335-352. 41.Hardisty, D. J., Appelt, K. C., Weber, E. U. (2013). Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 26, 348-361. 42.Harris, C. R. (2012). Feelings of dread and intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 25(1), 13-28. 43.Harrison, G.W., Rutstrom, E.E. (2008). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In Risk aversion in experiments (pp. 41–196) Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 44.Herweg, F., Mu¨ller, D. (2011). Performance of procrastinators: On the value of deadlines. Theory and Decision, 70(3), 329-366. 45.Houser, D., Schunk, D., Winter, J., Xiao, E. (2018). Temptation and Commitment in the Laboratory. Games and Economic Behavior , 107, 329-344. 46.Imai T., Rutter T. A., Camerer C. F., (2021). Meta-Analysis of Present-Bias Estimation using Convex Time Budgets. The Economic Journal , Volume 131, Issue 636, 1788–1814. 47.Kreps, David M. and Evan L. Porteus (1978). Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory. Econometrica, 1978, 46 (1), 185–200. 48.Laibson, D. (2003). Intertemporal Decision Making . Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Nature Publishing Group, London. 49.Laibson, D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62, 443-77. 50.Lejuez, C.W., Read, J.P., Kahler, C.W., Richards, J.B., Ramsey, S.E., Stuart, G.L., Strong, D.R., Brown, R.A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the balloon analogue risk task (bart). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 8(2), 75–84. 51.Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. The Economic Journal , 97(387), 666-684. 52.Lowenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation, Quar- terly Journal of Economics, 107, 573-598. 53.Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1993). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review , 100(1), 91-108. 54.Lusk, J.L., Coble, K.H. (2005). Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 393–405. 55.Meier, S., Sprenger, C. (2010). Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(1), 193-210. 56.O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin M. (1999a). Doing It Now or Later. American Economic Review , 891, 103-124. 57.O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (1999b). Incentives for procrastinators. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 769-816. 58.O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (2001). Choice and procrastination. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 121-160. 59.O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (2008). Procrastination on long-term projects. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 66:2, 161-175. 60.Pan, J., Webb, C. S., Zank, H. (2015). An extension of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. Games and Economic Behavior , 89, 43-55. 61.Phelps, ES., Pollak, RA. (1968). On Second-best National Saving and Game-equilibrium Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35, 185-199. 62.Sutter, M., Kocher, M. G., Gl¨atzle-Ru¨tzler, D., Trautmann, S. T. (2013). Impatience and uncertainty: Ex- perimental decisions predict adolescents’ field behavior. American Economic Review, 103(1), 510-31. 63.Takeuchi, K. (2011). Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias. Games and Economic Behavior , 71(2), 456-478. 64.Thaler, R. H., and S. Benartzi (2004). Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy , 112(1), 164-187. 65.Trope, Y., and A. Fishbach (2000). Counteractive Self-Control in Overcoming Temptation. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology , 79(4), 493-506. 66.Yates, F. J., Watts, R. A. (1975). Preferences for deferred losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 294–306. 67.Weber, B. J., Chapman, G. B. (2005). The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 96(2), 104-118. 68.Webb, C. S. (2016). Continuous quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 64, 99-106. 69.Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen [The retention of completed and uncompleted actions]. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85.