Do Gamblers Understand Complex Bets? Evidence From Asian Handicap Betting on Soccer

Hegarty, Tadgh and Whelan, Karl (2023): Do Gamblers Understand Complex Bets? Evidence From Asian Handicap Betting on Soccer.

Abstract

The Asian Handicap is a way to bet on soccer matches where payouts depend on an adjustment to the score that favors the weaker team. These bets are more complex than traditional betting on soccer because they require assessing the likely goal difference in the match rather than just the probabilities of a home win, away win or draw and because they can feature the possibility of all or half the bet being refunded. We show that bettors systematically lose more money on the type of Asian Handicap bets where refunds are not possible than they do when it is possible to obtain a half refund and that bets with the possibility of a full refund have the lowest loss rates. Bookmakers do not appear to adjust odds to equate the expected return on these bets. We show that the pattern of differences in loss rates across bets is predictable based on the odds quoted.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Pricing Complexity, Betting Markets, Asian Handicap
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G0 - General; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L83 - Sports ; Gambling ; Restaurants ; Recreation ; Tourism

References

Angelini, Giovanni and Luca De Angelis (2019). ``Efficiency of online football betting markets,'' \textit{International Journal of Forecasting}, Volume 35, pages 712–721.

Buhagiar, Ranier, Dominic Cortis, and Philip Newall (2015). ``Why do some soccer bettors lose more money than others?'' \textit{Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Finance}, Volume 18, pages 85-93.

Carlin, Bruce (2019). ``Strategic price complexity in retail financial markets,'' \textit{Journal of Financial Economics}, Volume 91, pages 278-287.

Cashmore, Vanessa, Neil Coster, David Forrest, Ian McHale and Babatunde Buraimo (2022). ``Female jockeys - what are the odds?'' \textit{Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization}, Volume 202, pages 703-713.

Davies, Rob (2022). Revealed: how bookies clamp down on successful gamblers and exploit the rest, The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/society/2022/feb/19/stake-factoring-how-bookies-clamp-down-on-successful-gamblers

Griffith, Richard (1949). ``Odds adjustment by American horse race bettors,'' \textit{American Journal of Psychology}, Volume 62, pages 290–294.

Hegarty, Tadgh and Karl Whelan (2023). Forecasting soccer matches with betting odds: A tale of two markets. CEPR discussion paper No.\ 17949.

Heiss, Florian, Adam Leive, Daniel McFadden, and Joachim Winter (2013). ``Plan selection in Medicare Part D: Evidence from administrative data,'' \textit{Journal of Health Economics}, Volume 32, pages 1325-1344.

Kalayci, Kenan (2015). ``Price complexity and buyer confusion in markets,'' \textit{Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization}, Volume 111, pages 154-168.

Lunn, Peter and Marek Bohacek (2017). ``Price transparency in residential electricity: Experiments for regulatory policy,'' \textit{Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy}, Volume 1, pages 31-37.

Marzilli Ericson, Keith and Amanda Starc (2016). ``How product standardization affects choice: Evidence from the Massachusetts Health Insurance Exchange'' \textit{Journal of Health Economics}, Volume 50, pages 71-85.

McElvaney, Terence, Peter Lunn and Féidhlim McGowan (2018). ``Do consumers understand PCP car finance? An experimental investigation,'' \textit{Journal of Consumer Policy}, Volume 41, pages 229–255.

Montone, Maurizio (2021). ``Optimal pricing in the online betting market,'' \textit{Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization}, Volume 186, pages 344-363.

Snowberg, Erik and Justin Wolfers (2008). ``Examining explanations of a market anomaly: Preferences or perceptions?'' in \textit{Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets}, Elsevier.