Utility of sacrifices: Reorientation of the utility theory

GC, Arun (2023): Utility of sacrifices: Reorientation of the utility theory. Published in: Review of Business and Economics Studies , Vol. 2, No. 11 (July 2023): pp. 67-72.

Abstract

Utility theory is a pivotal concept in economics that provides insights into how an individual is motivated to act under budget constraints. The main assumption of this theory and the entire field of economics is that a rational human being and an individual derive utility from the consumption of goods and services under given budget constraints.

The aim of this article is to explore these fundamental assumptions and introduce a new theoretical framework for deriving utility, which is termed the “utility of sacrifices”.

Various methods were employed in the study, including a review of existing literature, an analysis of prevailing theories, and observations in real-world scenarios.

The results show that, through observations, a “rational” human being derives utility from both consumption and voluntary sacrifices.

Therefore, in conclusion, it is proposed that the total utility of an individual is the sum of these two components. This theoretical framework provides a more comprehensive understanding of human decision-making and behavior in economics. It also provides novel insights for future research and applications in economics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: utility; consumption; sacrifices; decision making; behavior
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory

References

1. Alvino L., Constantinides E., Franco M. Towards a better understanding of consumer behavior: marginal utility as a parameter in neuromarketing research. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 2018;10(1):90-106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v10n1p90

2. Read D. Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2004.

3. Sinisi C. Public school choice: parents’ consumer behavior and utility maximization. University of Colorado. 1992.

4. Fishburn P. C. Utility theory. Management Science. 1968;14(5):335-378. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.14.5.335

5. Michael R. T., Becker G. S. On the new theory of consumer behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 1973;75(4):378-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/3439147

6. Burgess J. P. From preference to utility: A problem of descriptive set theory. Notre Dame. Journal of Formal Logic. 1985;26(2):106-114. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093870819

7. Sepúlveda W. S., Maza M. T., Uldemolins P., Cantos-Zambrano E.G., Ureta I. Linking dark chocolate product attributes, consumer preferences, and consumer utility: impact of quality labels, cocoa content, chocolate origin, and price. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing. 2022;34(5):518- 537. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2021.1908924

8. Kapteyn A. Utility and economics. De Economist. 1985;133(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675959

9. Stigler G. J. The development of utility theory. International Journal of Political Economics. 1950;58(4):307-327. https://doi.org/10.1086/256962

10. Rogers A. E. The theory of utility. Science. 1886;8(193):347-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-8.193.347-a

11. David J. The homo economicus conception of the individual: an ontological approach. In U. MaKi. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Economics. 2012;13:459-482.

12. Boumans M. Measurement in economics. In U. Maki. Handbook Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Economics.2012;13:395-423.

13. Browning E., Browning J. Microeconomic theory and applications. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 2003.

14. Evans D. J. The elasticity of marginal utility of consumption: estimates for 20 OECD countries. Fiscal Studies. 2005;26(2):197-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00010.x

15. Koutsoyiannis A. Modern microeconomics. 2nd ed. London: MACMILLAN PRESS LTD; 1979.

16. Lancaster K. J. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal Political Economics. 1966;74(2):132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131

17. Zeckhauser R. Time as the ultimate source of utility. The Quarterly Journal Economics. 1973;87(4):668- 675. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882037

18. Tanrikulu C. Theory of consumption values in consumer behaviour research: a review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2021;45(6):1176-1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12687

19. Urbina D. A., Ruiz-Villaverde A. A critical review of homo economicus from five approaches. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2019;78(1):63-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12258

20. Kalberg S. Max Weber’s types of rationality: cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology. 1980;85(5):1145-79. https://doi.org/10.1086/227128

21. Demeulenaere P. Are there many types of rationality? Papers Revista de Sociologia. 2014;99(4):515-528. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2114

22. Dittmer T. Diminishing marginal utility in economics textbooks. The Journal of Economic Education. 2005;36(4):391-399.