Morales-Oñate, Víctor (2019): Redes de Poder y Economía en Bertrand Russell. Published in: Chakiñan No. 8 (1 August 2019): pp. 36-51.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_119183.pdf Download (477kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The concept of power is central to the social thought of Bertrand Russell and can be taken as the frame of reference for understanding his thinking outside the boundaries of analytic philosophy or the foundations of mathematics. This article of reflection analyzes Russell from the sciences of the spirit, where inevitably his concept of power plays a cardinal role. The analysis focuses on the role that the economy plays in its social thinking. For this we go through the typology in which Russell frames the economy, as a part of a system of power. It reviews the precisions that Russell establishes of the economy as a form that adopts the power, such as the sacerdotal, manifest or revolutionary power, among others. It shows that the economy is not a function of a specific form of power, nor is the general form of power, but a correlated sphere and in constant tension the revised forms of power. This process allows us to establish an economy-power relationship following a consistent systematization in terms of networks and which is articulated with its general framework of power system.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Redes de Poder y Economía en Bertrand Russell |
English Title: | Power Networks and Economy in Bretrand Russell |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | power network, economy, Russell, power |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B10 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General |
Item ID: | 119183 |
Depositing User: | Victor Morales-Oñate |
Date Deposited: | 24 Nov 2023 16:56 |
Last Modified: | 24 Nov 2023 16:56 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A. (2000). Political losers as a barrier to economic development. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 126-130. Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. The Sociological Quarterly, 2(2), 142-144. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1993). Power and wealth in a competitive capitalist economy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21(4), 324–353. Foucault, M. (1988). El sujeto y el poder. Revista mexicana de sociología, 50(3), 3-20. French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory. Classics of organization theory. 7, 311-320. Glock, H. J. (2008). What is analytic philosophy?. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Cambridge University Press. Gramsci, A., & Vega, A. G. (1967). La formación de los intelectuales. DF, México: Grijalbo. Griffin, N. (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Londres, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. Kilgarriff, P., Charlton, M., Foley, R., & O'Donoghue, C. (2019). The impact of housing consumption value on the spatial distribution of welfare. Journal of Housing Economics, 43, 118-130. King, J.E. (2005). Bertrand Russell on Economics, 1889-1918. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 25(1), 5-38. King, J.E. (2007). Popular Philosophy and popular Economics: Bertrand Russell, 1919-70. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies (1), 193-219. Laclau, E. (1993). Poder y representación. Politics, theory and contemporary culture. Lippincot, M. (1990). Russell's leviathan. Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies. 10(1), 6-29 Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R.(1995). Microeconomic theory. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford university press. Palermo, G. (2014). The economic debate on power: a Marxist critique. Journal of Economic Methodology. 21(2), 175-192. Rollins, B. C., & Bahr, S. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 619–627 Russell, B. (1903). Principia Mathematica. Londres, Inglaterra: Cambrigde University Press. Russell, B. (1917). Political Ideals. Nueva York. Estados Unidos: The Century Co. Russell, B. (1918). Proposed Roads to Freedom: Socialism, Anarchism, and Syndicalism. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin. Russell, B. (1934). Freedom and Organization. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin. Russell, B. (1938). Power: A New Social Analysis. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin. Russell, B. (18 de agosto de 1945). The Bomb and Civilization. Forward, pp. 29. Russell, B. (1949). Authority and the Individual. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin. Russell, B. (1951). New Hopes for a Changing World. Londres. Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin. Russell, B. (1975). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. Londres. Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin. Schilpp, P. (1944). The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell. Chicago: Northwestern University. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press. Simpson, J., Farrell, A., Allison K, Oriña, M. & Rothman, A., J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. APA handbook of personality and social psychology. 3(3), 393-420. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Willey. Weber, M. (1992). Economía y sociedad. Ensayo de sociología comprensiva. DF, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/119183 |