Business Forms and Business Performance in UK Manufacturing 1871-81

Hannah, Leslie and Foreman-Peck, James S. (2023): Business Forms and Business Performance in UK Manufacturing 1871-81.

Abstract

We analyse a new dataset of 483 manufacturing firms in 1881 either that employed at least 1000 or had done so a decade earlier. Among these firms the majority were partnerships, but public corporations attained higher capital/ labour ratios and stronger employment growth than other business forms. The divorce of ownership from control was most effective where it was most thoroughly practised, as by public, in contrast to private, corporations. Engineers were frequently encountered in all business forms and associated with expanding employment. But the large public manufacturing corporations employed almost twice the proportion of engineers and professionals in top management as other enterprises. We find that family firms, proxied by heirs, were present in management of three quarters of partnerships but in only one third of public corporations, and did indeed reduce the employment growth of the firm, whereas engineers boosted it by more. Lords, mayors and landed wealth in management were also associated with faster employment growth of enterprises. These results suggest some stereotypes in the literature need to be more precisely defined or seriously questioned.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Business performance, corporations, partnerships, manufacturing, engineers, Victorian economy
• Subjects: N - Economic History > N0 - General; N - Economic History > N8 - Micro-Business History; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

Acheson, G. G., Campbell, G., Turner, J. D. and Vanteeva, N. ‘Corporate ownership and control in Victorian Britain.’ Economic History Review, 68,2015, pp. 911-936.

Acheson, G. G., G. Campbell, J. D. Turner and N. Vanteeva ‘ Corporate ownership, control and firm performance in Victorian Britain.’ Journal of Economic History, 76, 2016, pp. 1-40.

Aldcroft, D. H., ‘The entrepreneur and the British economy, 1870–1914’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., XVII (1964), pp. 113–34.

Aldous M, Fliers P and Turner J ‘Was Marshall Right? Managerial Failure and Corporate Ownership in Edwardian Britain’. Journal of Economic History, 83(1), (2023, pp.131-165

Alford B W, E W. D. & H. O. Wills and the Development of the UK tobacco Industry, 1786-1965. Methuen,1973

Anderson C A and Schnaper M, School and Society in England. Social Background of Oxford and Cambridge Students. Washington DC, 1952

Armstrong, J. ‘The Rise and Fall of the Company Promoter and the Financing of British Industry.’ In Capitalism in a Mature Economy: Financial Institutions, Capital

Hannah and Bennett,’Large-scale Victorian Manufacturers.’ Exports, and British Industry, 1870-1939, edited by J. J. van Helten and Y. Cassis, 115-39. Aldershot, UK: Edwin Elgar Publishing,1990, pp.115-38

Bateman, J., The Great Landowners of Great Britain and Ireland (4 edns 1876-83; repr., ed. D. Spring, 1971).

Bergeaud A and Verluise C, ‘A new dataset to study a century of innovation in Europe and in the US,’ Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper no. 1850, 2022

Blair, M. M, ‘Locking in capital: what corporate law achieved for business organizers in the nineteenth century,’ UCLA Law Review, 51,2003, 387–455.

Booth, C., ‘Occupations of the people of the United Kingdom, 1801–81’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 49 (1886), pp. 314–444

Braggion F and Moore L ‘The Economic Benefits of Political Connections in Late Victorian Britain,’ Journal of Economic History, 73(1), 2013, pp.142-176

Cannadine, D.’The Landowner as Millionaire: The Finances of the Dukes of Devonshire, c.1800-c. 1926,’ Agricultural History Review 252, 1977, pp.77-97

Cannadine, D.. Lords and Landlords: the Aristocracy and the Towns, 1774–1967. Leicester: LUP, 1982,

Chandler, A. . Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1990.

Foreman-Peck J Smith & Nephew in the Health Care Industry, Edward Elgar: Aldershot and Vermont, 1995.

Fjesme S L , Galpin N E , Moore L, ‘Rejected stock exchange applicants,’ Journal of Financial Economics 139 (2021), pp. 502–31.

Fjesme S L , Galpin N E , Moore L,,’ An efficient market? Going public in London, 1891–1911,’ Economic History Review, 72,3 (2019), pp. 1008–27.

Fjesme S L , Galpin N E , Moore L,, ‘British IPO directors, 1891–1911,’ Business History, 63,2 (2021), pp. 292-313.

Fjesme S L , Galpin N E , Moore L,, Hannah L and Moore L, ‘Informed investors, screening, and sorting on the London capital market, 1891-1913,’ Explorations in Economic History, forthcoming 2023.

Geroski P , Lazarova S, Urga G and Walters C ‘Are differences in firm size transitory or permanent?’ Journal of Applied Econometrics 18 (1), 2003, pp. 47-59

Gourvish, T. R.’ A British business elite: The chief executive managers of the railway industry, 1850-1922.’ Business History Review, 47, 1973, pp. 289-316.

Graiciunas, V A, Relationship in Organization, Geneva, 1933. Guagnini, A, ‘Worlds apart: academic instruction and professional qualifications in the training of mechanical engineers in England 1850-1914.’ In R Fox and A Guagnini (Eds.) Education, Technology and Industrial Performance in Europe 1850-1939.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993, pp. 16-41.

Guinnane T, Harris R, Lamoreaux N and Rosenthal J-L ‘Putting the Corporation in its Place,’ Enterprise & Society 8(3), 2007, pp. 687-729

Halvorsen R and Palmquist R ‘The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations,’ American Economic Review 70(3), 2001, pp. 474-475

Hanlon, W. Walker ‘The Rise of the Engineer: Inventing the Professional Inventor During the Industrial Revolution,’ NBER Working Paper No. 29751 February 2022

Hannah, L. ‘The Whig fable of American Tobacco,’ Journal of Economic History, 66(1), 2006, pp. 42-73

Hannah L , “Corporations in the US and Europe 1790 – 1860,” Business History, 56(1) 2014, pp. 865–899;

Hannah L, A global corporate census: publicly traded and close companies in 1910,” Economic History Review, 68(2), 2015, pp. 548-573

Hannah L and Bennett R . ‘Large-scale Victorian Manufacturers: Reconstructing the lost 1881 UK employer census,’ Economic History Review 75 (3, 2022, pp.) 830-856

Johnson, P Making the market: Victorian origins of corporate capitalism. Cambridge, CUP, 2010.

Lamoreaux, N.R., Levenstein, M. and Sokoloff, KL., ‘Financing invention during the Second Industrial Revolution: Cleveland, Ohio, 1870-1920’, in: Lamoreaux, N.R., Sokoloff, K. L. (Eds.), The Financing of Innovation in Historical Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 2006.

Lazonick, W. Organization and Technology in Capitalist Development. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1992

Matthews D. Anderson M. and Edwards J R The Priesthood of Industry : the Rise of the Professional Accountant in British Management, OUP, Oxford,, 1998

Mokyr J The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress, New York, Oxford, OUP, 2000

Morgan N J and Moss M S (’ Listing the Wealthy in Scotland, HistResearch1986, pp. 189-195

Murphy K, Shleifer A and Vishny R ‘The Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 1(2), 1991, pp. 503-530.

Newcomer, M. The Big Business Executive: The Factors That Made Him, 1900-1950. New York: Columbia University Press, 1955

Nicholas, T. ‘Businessmen and land ownership in the late nineteenth century.’ Economic History Review, 52, 1999, pp. 27-44.

Nicholas, ’Clogs to Clogs in Three Generations? Explaining Entrepreneurial Performance in Britain Since 1850,’ Journal of Economic History, 5(3), 1999, pp. 688-713.

Pollard S Britain’s Prime and Britain’s Decline: the British Economy 1870-1914, Edward Arnold, 1989Reynolds J The Great Paternalist: Titus Salt and the Growth of Nineteenth Century Bradford, Maurice Temple Smith, Bradford, 1983

Ritchie B An Uncommon Brewer: The Story of Whitbread 1742-1992, James & James,1992

Rutterford J and Hannah L, ‘The Unsung Activists: UK Shareholder Investigation Committees, 1888–1940,’ Business History Review, 96 (Winter 2022), pp. 741–75.

Shannon H A ‘The Limited Companies of 1866-1883’ Economic History Review, 4(3),1933, pp. 290-316

Skinner T S The Directory of Directors. Skinner,, 1881

Smith J. ‘Land ownership and social change in late nineteenth-century Britain’, Economic History Review 53(4), 2000, pp. 767–776

Sutton J ‘Gibrat’s Legacy’ Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1997, pp.40-59 39