Technological diversity to address complex challenges: the contribution of American universities to sdgs

Ascione, Grazia Sveva (2023): Technological diversity to address complex challenges: the contribution of American universities to sdgs.

Abstract

Much of the literature emphasizes the relationship between interdisciplinarity and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are seen as closely linked and highly interdisciplinary. Therefore, innovation related to the SDGs is expected to be technologically diverse, especially when it emanates from academia, where teams of researchers collaborate to create innovation for the benefit of society. However, research on innovation for the SDGs is still in its infancy due to a lack of comprehensive quantitative analysis about its characteristics and a lack of consideration of potentially relevant actors, such as universities. This paper aims to make a threefold contribution to the existing literature by analyzing USPTO patent data from 2006 to 2020. First, we develop a novel method for tagging SDGs-related patents using an unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) approach. Starting from an initial list of keywords, we build an extended dictionary of keywords for each SDG based on the patent text by combining the TF-IDF method with a vector representation of the patent text and SDGs keywords. Second, we analyze innovation related to the SDGs, focusing particularly on the contribution of universities. Third, we compare the diversity of SDGs and non-SDGs patents using the Rao-Stirling index. Our results show that patents related to the SDGs are on the rise, but the trend is more pronounced for universities, where the majority of innovation production revolves around SDG 3 (good health and well-being). Moreover, the rise in SDGs patents seems to be led not only by green technologies, but mainly by high technologies. Eventually, the empirical results point in two directions. On the one hand, SDGs related patents are more diverse than their counterparts across almost all technology sectors. However, if we consider university patents only, there is a diversity premium only for a few SDGs, namely SDG 2, SDG 3, and SDG 15.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: echnological diversity; University patents; Interdisciplinarity; SDGs; United States
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

References

Abbott, F. M. (2002), ‘Wto trips agreement and its implications for access to medicines in developing countries’, Study Paper 2a, United Kingdom Commission on Intellectual Property Rights.

Abrahamson, E. and Baumard, P. (2008), What lies behind organizational façades and how organizational façades lie: An untold story of organizational decision making, in ‘The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making’.

Ahuja, G. and Morris Lampert, C. (2001), ‘Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions’, Strategic management journal 22(6-7), 521–543.

Albareda-Tiana, S., Vidal-Raméntol, S. and Fernández-Morilla, M. (2018), ‘Implementing the sustainable development goals at university level’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.

Alstott, J., Triulzi, G., Yan, B. and Luo, J. (2017), ‘Mapping technology space by normalizing patent networks’, Scientometrics 110(1), 443–479.

Álvarez, I., Etxeberria, P., Alberdi, E., Pérez-Acebo, H., Eguia, I. and García, M. J. (2021), ‘Sustainable civil engineering: Incorporating sustainable development goals in higher education curricula’, Sustainability 13(16), 8967.

Annan-Diab, F. and Molinari, C. (2017), ‘Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the sustainable development goals’, The International Journal of Management Education 15(2), 73–83.

Arthur, W. B. (2007), ‘The structure of invention’, Research policy 36(2), 274–287.

Audia, P. G. and Goncalo, J. A. (2007), ‘Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry’, Management science 53(1), 1–15.

Bannerman, S. (2020), ‘The world intellectual property organization and the sustainable development agenda’, Futures 122, 102586.

Barbieri, N., Marzucchi, A. and Rizzo, U. (2020), ‘Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones?’, Research Policy 49(2), 103901.

Biancani, S., Dahlander, L., McFarland, D. A. and Smith, S. (2018), ‘Superstars in the making? the broad effects of interdisciplinary centers’, Research Policy 47(3), 543–557.

Blakeney, M. (2009), Intellectual property rights and food security, Cabi.

Blasco, N., Brusca, I. and Labrador, M. (2020), ‘Drivers for universities’ contribution to the sustainable development goals: An analysis of spanish public universities’, Sustainability 13(1), 89.

Blau, P. M. (1977), Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure, Vol. 7, Free Press New York.

Blohmke, J. (2014), ‘Technology complexity, technology transfer mechanisms and sustainable development’, Energy for Sustainable Development 23, 237–246.

Bonino, D., Ciaramella, A. and Corno, F. (2010), ‘Review of the state-of-the-art in patent information and forthcoming evolutions in intelligent patent informatics’, World Patent Information 32(1), 30–38.

Bottazzi, G. and Pirino, D. (2010), ‘Measuring industry relatedness and corporate coherence’, Available at SSRN 1831479.

Ceulemans, K., Lozano, R. and Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M. (2015), ‘Sustainability reporting in higher education: Interconnecting the reporting process and organisational change management for sustainability’, Sustainability 7(7), 8881–8903.

Chen, J., Chen, J., Zhao, S., Zhang, Y. and Tang, J. (2020), ‘Exploiting word embedding for heterogeneous topic model towards patent recommendation’, Scientometrics 125(3), 2091–2108.

Cordova, M. F. and Celone, A. (2019), ‘SDGs and innovation in the business context literature review’, Sustainability 11(24), 7043.

De Marchi, V. (2012), ‘Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms’, Research policy 41(3), 614–623.

De Marchi, V. and Grandinetti, R. (2013), ‘Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: the case of Italian manufacturing firms’, Journal of knowledge management.

Deuten, J. (2003), ‘Cosmopolitanising technologies. A study of four emerging technological regimes’.

El-Jardali, F., Ataya, N. and Fadlallah, R. (2018), ‘Changing roles of universities in the era of SDGs: rising up to the global challenge through institutionalising partnerships with governments and communities’, Health research policy and systems 16(1), 1–5.

Engelsman, E. C. and van Raan, A. F. (1994), ‘A patent-based cartography of technology’, Research Policy 23(1), 1–26.

Feng, S. (2020), ‘The proximity of ideas: An analysis of patent text using machine learning’, PloS one 15(7), e0234880.

Fusillo, F., Quatraro, F. and Santhià, C. (2021), The geography of circular economy technologies in Europe: evolutionary patterns and technological convergence, in ‘Research Handbook of Innovation for a Circular Economy’, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Fusillo, F. et al. (2020), Are green inventions really more complex? evidence from European patents, Technical report, University of Turin.

Guo, M., Nowakowska-Grunt, J., Gorbanyov, V. and Egorova, M. (2020), ‘Green technology and sustainable development: Assessment and green growth frameworks’, Sustainability 12(16), 6571.

Hajikhani, A. and Suominen, A. (2021), ‘The interrelation of sustainable development goals in publications and patents: A machine learning approach’.

Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. I. (1997), ‘Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm’, Administrative science quarterly pp. 716–749.

Haščič, I. and Migotto, M. (2015), ‘Measuring environmental innovation using patent data’.

Henry, C. and Stiglitz, J. E. (2010), ‘Intellectual property, dissemination of innovation and sustainable development’, Global Policy 1(3), 237–251.

Hernandez-Aguilera, J. N., Anderson, W., Bridges, A. L., Fernandez, M. P., Hansen, W. D., Maurer, M. L., Ilboudo Nebie, E. K. and Stock, A. (2021), ‘Supporting interdisciplinary careers for sustainability’, Nature Sustainability 4(5), 374–375.

Idris, K. (2003), ‘A power tool for economic growth’, WIPO publication 888.

Jaffe, A. B. and Trajtenberg, M. (2002), Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy, MIT press.

Jones, P., Selby, D. and Sterling, S. (2010), ‘More than the sum of their parts? interdisciplinarity and sustainability’, Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education pp. 17–38.

Kestin, T., van den Belt, M., Denby, L., Ross, K., Thwaites, J. and Hawkes, M. (2017), ‘Getting started with the SDGs in universities: A guide for universities, higher education institutions, and the academic sector’.

Kopnina, H. (2020), ‘Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals’, The Journal of Environmental Education 51(4), 280–291.

Körfgen, A., Förster, K., Glatz, I., Maier, S., Becsi, B., Meyer, A., Kromp-Kolb, H. and Stötter, J. (2018), ‘It’s a hit! Mapping Austrian research contributions to the sustainable development goals’, Sustainability 10(9), 3295.

Kostoska, O. and Kocarev, L. (2019), ‘A novel ICT framework for sustainable development goals’, Sustainability 11(7), 1961.

Lam, J. C., Walker, R. M. and Hills, P. (2014), ‘Interdisciplinarity in sustainability studies: a review’, Sustainable Development 22(3), 158–176.

Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., Molthan-Hill, P., Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Vargas, V. R. et al. (2019), ‘Sustainable development goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack?’, Journal of Cleaner Production 232, 285–294.

Lemley, M. A. (2007), ‘Are universities patent trolls’, Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. LJ 18, 611.

Leydesdorff, L. (2018), ‘Diversity and interdisciplinarity: how can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance?’, Scientometrics 116(3), 2113–2121.

Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S. and Bornmann, L. (2019), ‘Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-stirling diversity, relative variety, and the gini coefficient’, Journal of Informetrics 13(1), 255–269.

Li, S., Hu, J., Cui, Y. and Hu, J. (2018), ‘Deeppatent: patent classification with convolutional neural networks and word embedding’, Scientometrics 117(2), 721–744.

Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D. and Lambrechts, W. (2013), ‘Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system’, Journal of Cleaner Production 48, 10–19.

Morse, W. C., Nielsen-Pincus, M., Force, J. E. and Wulfhorst, J. (2007), ‘Bridges and barriers to developing and conducting interdisciplinary graduate-student team research’, Ecology and Society 12(2).

Nelsen, L. (2002), ‘The role of university technology transfer operations in assuring access to medicines and vaccines in developing countries’, Yale J. Health Pol’y L. & Ethics 3, 301.

Newell, W. H., Wentworth, J. and Sebberson, D. (2001), ‘A theory of interdisciplinary studies’, Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies.

Nilsson, M., Griggs, D. and Visbeck, M. (2016), ‘Policy: map the interactions between sustainable development goals’, Nature 534(7607), 320–322.

Noh, H., Jo, Y. and Lee, S. (2015), ‘Keyword selection and processing strategy for applying text mining to patent analysis’, Expert Systems with Applications 42(9), 4348–4360.

Oguamanam, C. (2006), ‘Intellectual property rights in plant genetic resources: Farmers’ rights and food security of indigenous and local communities’, Drake J. Agric. L. 11, 273.

Orsatti, G., Quatraro, F. and Pezzoni, M. (2020), ‘The antecedents of green technologies: The role of team-level recombinant capabilities’, Research Policy 49(3), 103919.

Owens, T. L. (2017), ‘Higher education in the sustainable development goals framework’, European Journal of Education 52(4), 414–420.

Papadimitriou, A. (2020), ‘Beyond rhetoric: Reinventing the public mission of higher education’.

Papke, L. E. and Wooldridge, J. M. (1996), ‘Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates’, Journal of applied econometrics 11(6), 619–632.

Popp, D. and Newell, R. (2012), ‘Where does energy R&D come from? Examining crowding out from energy R&D’, Energy economics 34(4), 980–991.

Porter, A., Cohen, A., David Roessner, J. and Perreault, M. (2007), ‘Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity’, Scientometrics 72(1), 117–147.

Porter, A. and Rafols, I. (2009), ‘Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time’, Scientometrics 81(3), 719–745.

Quatraro, F. and Scandura, A. (2019), ‘Academic inventors and the antecedents of green technologies. A regional analysis of Italian patent data’, Ecological Economics 156, 247–263.

Rafols, I. and Meyer, M. (2010), ‘Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience’, Scientometrics 82(2), 263–287.

Rao, C. R. (1982), ‘Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach’, Theoretical population biology 21(1), 24–43.

Reimers, N. and Gurevych, I. (2019), ‘Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.

Rimmer, M. (2014), ‘Intellectual property and global warming: fossil fuels and climate justice’, The Sage Handbook of Intellectual Property, London: Sage Publications pp. 727–753.

Rimmer, M. (2018), ‘A submission on intellectual property and the united nations sustainable development goals’.

Rogers, F. T. (2020), ‘Patent text similarity and cross-cultural venture-backed innovation’, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 26, 100319.

Roudsari, A. H., Afshar, J., Lee, S. and Lee, W. (2021), Comparison and analysis of embedding methods for patent documents, in ‘2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp)’, IEEE, pp. 152–155.

Rylance, R. (2015), ‘Grant giving: Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity’, Nature 525(7569), 313–315.

Sampat, B. N. (2020), ‘Whose drugs are these?’, Issues in Science and Technology 36(4), 42–48.

Sampat, B. N. (2021), ‘The government and pharmaceutical innovation: Looking back and looking ahead’, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 49(1), 10–18.

Sánchez-Carracedo, F., Ruiz-Morales, J., Valderrama-Hernández, R., Muñoz-Rodríguez, J. M. and Gomera, A. (2021), ‘Analysis of the presence of sustainability in higher education degrees of the Spanish university system’, Studies in Higher Education 46(2), 300–317.

Stirling, A. (2007), ‘A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society’, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4(15), 707–719.

Tarrant, S. P. and Thiele, L. P. (2017), ‘Enhancing and promoting interdisciplinarity in higher education’, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 7(2), 355–360.

Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G. and Winter, S. (1994), ‘Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence’, Journal of economic behavior & organization 23(1), 1–30.

Thomas, I. (2016), Challenges for implementation of education for sustainable development in higher education institutions, in ‘Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development’, number 4, RMIT University, pp. 56–71.

Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. and Jaffe, A. (1997), ‘University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention’, Economics of Innovation and new technology 5(1), 19–50.

Tseng, Y.-H., Lin, C.-J. and Lin, Y.-I. (2007), ‘Text mining techniques for patent analysis’, Information processing & management 43(5), 1216–1247.

UN (2020), Guidebook for the preparation of science, technology and innovation (STI) for SDGs roadmaps, Technical report.

Usui, S., Palmes, P., Nagata, K., Taniguchi, T. and Ueda, N. (2007), ‘Keyword extraction, ranking, and organization for the neuroinformatics platform’, Biosystems 88(3), 334–342.

van der Waal, J. W., Thijssens, T. and Maas, K. (2021), ‘The innovative contribution of multinational enterprises to the sustainable development goals’, Journal of Cleaner Production 285, 125319.

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M. and Fuso Nerini, F. (2020), ‘The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals’, Nature communications 11(1), 1–10.

Walz, R., Pfaff, M., Marscheider-Weidemann, F. and Glöser-Chahoud, S. (2017), ‘Innovations for reaching the green sustainable development goals–where will they come from?’, International Economics and Economic Policy 14(3), 449–480.

Wang, J., Thijs, B. and Glänzel, W. (2015), ‘Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity’, PloS one 10(5), e0127298.

Weitzman, M. L. (1998), ‘Recombinant growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(2), 331–360.

Winickoff, D. E. (2013), ‘Private assets, public mission: The politics of technology transfer and the new American university’, Jurimetrics pp. 1–42.

WIPO (2012), ‘IPC green inventory’.

WIPO (2018), ‘Report on WIPO’s contribution to the implementation of the sustainable development goals and its associated targets’.

WIPO (2019), ‘Report on WIPO’s contribution to the implementation of the sustainable development goals and its associated targets’.

Xie, Z. and Miyazaki, K. (2013), ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of keyword search strategy for patent identification’, World Patent Information 35(1), 20–30.

Yan, B. and Luo, J. (2017), ‘Measuring technological distance for patent mapping’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68(2), 423–437.

Zeppini, P. and van Den Bergh, J. C. (2011), ‘Competing recombinant technologies for environmental innovation: extending Arthur’s model of lock-in’, Industry and Innovation 18(03), 317–334.

Zhu, K., Malhotra, S. and Li, Y. (2022), ‘Technological diversity of patent applications and decision pendency’, Research Policy 51(1), 104364.