Batabyal, Amitrajeet and Beladi, Hamid (2024): Decentralized vs. Centralized Water Pollution Cleanup in the Ganges in a Model with Three Cities.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_120175.pdf Download (533kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We think of the cleanup of water pollution in the Ganges river in India as a local public good and ask whether this cleanup ought to be decentralized or centralized. We depart from the existing literature on this subject in two important ways. First, we allow the heterogeneous spillovers from cleaning up water pollution to be positive or negative. Second, we focus on water pollution cleanup in three cities---Kanpur, Prayagraj, Varanasi---through which the Ganges flows. Our model sheds light on two broad issues. First, we characterize efficient water pollution cleanup in the three cities, we describe how much water pollution is cleaned up under decentralization, we describe the set of cleanup amounts under decentralization, and we discuss why pollution cleanup under decentralization is unlikely to be efficient. Second, we focus on centralization. We derive the tax paid by the inhabitants of the three cities for pollution cleanup, the benefit to a city inhabitant from water pollution cleanup, how majority voting determines how much pollution is cleaned up when the spillovers from cleanup are uniform, and finally, we compare the amounts of pollution cleaned up with majority voting with the efficient pollution cleanup amounts.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Decentralized vs. Centralized Water Pollution Cleanup in the Ganges in a Model with Three Cities |
English Title: | Decentralized vs. Centralized Water Pollution Cleanup in the Ganges in a Model with Three Cities |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Centralization, Cost Sharing, Decentralization, Ganges River, Water Pollution |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling |
Item ID: | 120175 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Amitrajeet Batabyal |
Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2024 10:21 |
Last Modified: | 21 Feb 2024 10:21 |
References: | Anh, N.T., Gan, C., and Anh, D.L.T. 2022. Multi-market credit rationing: The determinants of and impacts on farm performance in Vietnam, Economic Analysis and Policy, 75, 159-173. Batabyal, A.A. 2023. Tanneries in Kanpur and pollution in the Ganges: A theoretical analysis, Regional Science Policy and Practice, 15, 1114-1123. Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2017. Cleaning the Ganges in Varanasi to attract tourists, Atlantic Economic Journal, 45, 511-513. Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2019. Probabilistic approaches to cleaning the Ganges in Varanasi to attract tourists, Natural Resource Modeling, 32, e12177, 1-11. Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2020. A political economy model of the Ganges pollution cleanup problem, Natural Resource Modeling, 33, e12285, 1-12. Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2023. Centralized versus decentralized cleanup of river water pollution: An application to the Ganges, Games, 14(5), 66. Batabyal, A.A., Kourtit, K., and Nijkamp, P. 2023a. Polluting tanneries and small farmers in Kanpur, India: A theoretical analysis, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 28, 331-336. Batabyal, A.A., Kourtit, K., and Nijkamp, P. 2023b. Climate change and water pollution: An application to the Ganges in Kanpur, Natural Resource Modeling, 36, e12370, 1-15. Batabyal, A.A., and Yoo, S.J. 2022. A theoretical analysis of costs, waste treatment, pollution in the Ganges, and leather production by tanneries in Kanpur, India, Regional Science Inquiry, 14, 47-53. Batabyal, A.A., and Yoo, S.J. 2023. Heterogeneity and Ganges water pollution cleanup in Kanpur and Varanasi. Unpublished Paper, Rochester Institute of Technology. Bhaduri, A., and Barbier, E.B. 2008a. Political altruism of transboundary water sharing, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, 8, Issue 1. Bhaduri, A., and Barbier, E.B. 2006. International water transfer and sharing: The case of the Ganges river, Environment and Development Economics, 13, 29-51. Black, G. 2016. Purifying the goddess, The New Yorker, 92, 46-53. Das, P., and Tamminga, K.R. 2012. The Ganges and the GAP: An assessment of efforts to clean a sacred river, Sustainability, 4, 1647-1668. Dhillon, A. 2014. Ganga management, South China Morning Post, September 14. http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1589301/ganga-management. Accessed on 19 December 2023. Ferrer, A., Thanh, L.H., Kiet, N.T., Chuong, P.H., Trang, V.T., and Hopanda, J.C. 2022. The impact of an adjusted cropping calendar on the welfare of rice farming households in the Mekong river delta, Vietnam, Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 639-652. Hindriks, J., and Myles, G.D. 2013. Intermediate Public Economics, 2nd edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Islam, M.S.N., and Gnauck, A. 2009. Threats to the Sundarbans mangrove wetland ecosystems from transboundary water allocation in the Ganges basin: A preliminary problem analysis, International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 13, 64-78. Jain, C.K., and Singh, S. 2020. Impact of climate change on the hydrological dynamics of river Ganga, India, Journal of Water and Climate Change, 11, 274-290. Jani, K., Ghattargi, V., Pawar, S., Inamdar, M., Shouche, Y., and Sharma, A. 2018. Anthropogenic activities induce depletion in microbial communities at urban sites of the river Ganges, Current Microbiology, 75, 79-83. Kedzior, S.B. 2017. ‘Preemptive participation’ and environmental awareness across Indian water quality policy, Journal of Environment and Development, 26, 272-296. Kumar, L., Deitch, M.J., Tunio, I.A., Kumar, A., Memon, S.A., Williams, L., Uroosa, T., Kumari, R., and Basheer, S. 2022. Assessment of physicochemical parameters in groundwater quality of desert area (Tharparkar) of Pakistan, Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 6, 100232. Kumar, L., Kumari, R., Kumar, A., Tunio, I.A., and Sassanelli, C. 2023. Water quality assessment and monitoring in Pakistan: A comprehensive review, Sustainability, 15, 6246. Lee, S., and Mitchell, S.M. 2019. Energy resources and the risk of conflict in shared river basins, Journal of Peace Research, 56, 336-351. Lockwood, B. 2002. Distributive politics and the costs of centralization, Review of Economic Studies, 69, 313-337. Mani, R. 2020. Prayagraj: Lockdown results in sharp decline in pollution in river Ganga and Yamuna, Times of India, 17 April. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/allahabad/prayagraj-lockdown-results-in-sharp-decline-in-pollution-in-river-ganga-and-yamuna/articleshow/75203355.cms. Accessed on 19 December 2023. Markandya, A., and Murty, M.N. 2004. Cost-benefit analysis of cleaning the Ganges: Some emerging environment and development issues, Environment and Development Economics, 9, 61-81. Salman, S.M.A., and Uprety, K. 1999. Hydro-politics in South Asia: A comparative analysis of the Mahakali and the Ganges treaties, Natural Resources Journal, 39, 295-343. Sanyal, S. 2013. Land of the Seven Rivers. Penguin, New Delhi, India. Sharma, P., Meher, P.K., Kumar, A., Gautam, Y.P., and Mishra, K.P. 2014. Changes in water quality index of Ganges river at different locations in Allahabad, Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology, 3-4, 67-76. Sharma, R., Kumar, R., Sharma, D.K., Sarkar, M., Mishra, B.K., Puri, V., Priyadarshani, I., Thong, P.H., Ngo, P.T.T., and Nhu, V. 2022. Water pollution examination through quality analysis of different rivers: A case study in India, Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 24, 7471-7492. Shukla, S. 2017. Allahabad’s Sangam among top four highly polluted stretches in Ganga, Millennium Post, 10 March. https://www.millenniumpost.in/nation/allahabads-sangam-among-top-four-highly-polluted-stretches-in-ganga-219444#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20study%20of,%2C%20and%20agricultural%20run%2Doff. Accessed on 19 December 2023. Wohl, E. 2010. A World of Rivers. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. Xing, S., and Batabyal, A.A. 2019. A safe minimum standard, an elasticity of substitution, and the cleanup of the Ganges in Varanasi, Natural Resource Modeling, 32, e12223, 1-11. Xu, J., Wang, H., and Tang, K. 2022. The sustainability of industrial structure on green eco-efficiency in the Yellow River basin, Economic Analysis and Policy, 74, 775-788. Younas, A., Kumar, L., Deitch, M.J., Qureshi, S.S., Shafiq, J., Naqvi, S.A., Kumar, A., Amjad, A.Q., Nizamuddin, S. 2022. Sustainability, 14, 12854. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/120175 |