Chu, Angus C. and Peretto, Pietro and Wang, Xilin (2024): Government spending and industrialization in a Schumpeterian economy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_120797.pdf Download (490kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The goal of this study is to contribute to the debate on the role of government spending in shaping the growth process. We take the analysis in three new directions. First, we investigate the role of government spending in a scale-invariant Schumpeterian model of endogenous innovation. Second, we allow public spending to be the catalyst that precipitates the takeoff of the economy. Third, we postulate a production structure that violates the conventional condition for endogenous growth, namely, that the economy's reduced-form production function must be linear in the accumulated factor. With non-distortionary taxation, increasing productive government spending causes an earlier industrial takeoff and faster economic growth. With distortionary labor-income tax under elastic labor supply, instead, increasing productive government spending has a U-shaped effect on the timing of the industrial takeoff and an inverted-U effect on economic growth. Using cross-country panel data, we document an inverted-U relationship between productive government spending and economic growth. Calibrating the model to US data, we find that raising productive government spending from its historical value to to its growth-maximizing value causes an earlier industrial takeoff by over six decades and an increase in the long-run level of output by 129%. We also explore the robustness of our results under consumption tax and corporate income tax.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Government spending and industrialization in a Schumpeterian economy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Government spending; taxation; industrialization; innovation; economic growth |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity |
Item ID: | 120797 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Angus C. Chu |
Date Deposited: | 10 May 2024 06:48 |
Last Modified: | 10 May 2024 06:48 |
References: | Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351. Agrawal, A., Galasso, A., and Oettl, A., 2017. Roads and innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99, 417-434. Ahmed, S., 1986. Temporary and permanent government spending in an open economy: Some evidence for the United Kingdom. Journal of Monetary Economics, 17, 197-224. Andres, J., Domenech, R., and Molinas, C., 1996. Macroeconomic performance and convergence in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 40, 1683-1704. Arawatari, R., Hori, T., and Mino, K., 2023. Government expenditure and economic growth: A heterogeneous-agents approach. Journal of Macroeconomics, 75, 103486. Aschauer, D.A., 1989. Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177-200. Asimakopoulos, S., and Karavias, I., 2016. The impact of government size on economic growth: A threshold analysis. Economics Letters, 139, 65-68. Barro, R., 1990. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S103-S125. Barro, R., and Sala-i-Martin, X., 1992. Public finance in models of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 59, 645-61. Chatterjee, S., and Turnovsky, S.J., 2012. Infrastructure and inequality. European Economic Review, 56, 1730-1745. Chen, P., Chu, A., Chu, H., and Lai, C., 2017. Short-run and long-run effects of capital taxation on innovation and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 53, 207-221. Chu, A., Fan, H., and Wang, X., 2020. Status-seeking culture and development of capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 180, 275-290. Chu, A., Furukawa, Y., and Wang, X., 2022. Rent-seeking government and endogenous takeoff in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 72, 103399. Chu, A., Kou, Z., and Wang, X., 2020. Effects of patents on the transition from stagnation to growth. Journal of Population Economics, 33, 395-411. Chu, A., Peretto, P., and Wang, X., 2022. Agricultural revolution and industrialization. Journal of Development Economics, 158, 102887. Chu, A., Peretto, P., and Xu, R., 2023. Export-Led Takeoff in a Schumpeterian Economy. Journal of International Economics, 145, 103798. Coayla, E., 2021. The optimal size of government and the Armey curve: A review of empirical evidence. Applied Economics Journal, 28, 121-137. De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., and Unger, G., 2020. The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135, 561-644. Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V., and Zou, H., 1996. The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 313-344. Donaldson, D., and Hornbeck, R., 2016. Railroads and American economic growth: A "market access" approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 799-858. Evans, P., and Karras, G., 1994. Are government activities productive? Evidence from a panel of U.S. states. Review Economics and Statistics, 76, 1-11. Fernald, J.G., 1999. Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Economic Review, 89, 619-638. Folster, S., and Henrekson, M., 2001. Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review, 45, 1501-1520. Futagami, K., Iwaisako, T., and Ohdoi, R., 2008. Debt policy rule, productive government spending, and multiple growth paths. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 12, 445-462. Futagami, K., and Mino, K., 1995. Public capital and patterns of growth in the presence of threshold externalities. Journal of Economics, 61, 123-146. Futagami, K., Morita, Y., and Shibata, A., 1993. Dynamic analysis of an endogenous growth model with public capital. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, 607-625. Glomm, G., and Ravikumar, B., 1994. Public investment in infrastructure in a simple growth model. Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, 18, 1173-1188. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61. Haruyama, T. and Itaya, J., 2006. Do distortionary taxes always harm growth?. Journal of Economics, 87, 99-126. Howitt, P., 1999. Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715-730. Iacopetta, M., and Peretto, P., 2021. Corporate governance and industrialization. European Economic Review, 135, 103718. Kneller, R., Bleaney, M.F., and Gemmell, N., 1999. Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 171-190. Kormendi, R.C., and Meguire, P.G., 1985. Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, 141-163. Laincz, C., and Peretto, P., 2006. Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: An error of aggregation not specification. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 263-288. Levine, R., and Renelt, D., 1992. A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review, 82, 942-963. Lin, H. C., and Russo, B., 1999. A taxation policy toward capital, technology and long-run growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 21, 463-491. Maebayashi, N., Hori, T., and Futagami, K., 2017. Dynamic analysis of reductions in public debt in an endogenous growth model with public capital. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 21, 1454-1483, Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283-311. Peretto, P., 1999. Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 173-195. Peretto, P., 2003. Fiscal policy and long-run growth in R&D-based models with endogenous market structure. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 325-347. Peretto, P., 2007a. Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 353-382. Peretto, P., 2007b. Schumpeterian growth with productive public spending and distortionary taxation. Review of Development Economics, 11, 699-722. Peretto, P., 2011. The growth and welfare effects of deficit-financed dividend tax cuts. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43, 835-869. Peretto, P., 2015. From Smith to Schumpeter: A theory of take-off and convergence to sustained growth. European Economic Review, 78, 1-26. Peretto, P., 2018. Robust endogenous growth. European Economic Review, 108, 49-77. Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102. Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-91. Smulders, S. and van de Klundert T., 1995. Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R&D. European Economic Review, 39, 139-160. Turnovsky, S.J., 1996. Optimal tax, debt, and expenditure policies in a growing economy. Journal of Public Economics, 60, 21-44. Turnovsky, S.J., 2000. Fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 45, 185-210. Zeng, J., and Zhang, J., 2002. Long-run growth effects of taxation in a non-scale growth model with innovation, Economics Letters, 75, 391-403. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/120797 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Government spending and industrialization in a Schumpeterian economy. (deposited 10 May 2024 06:48) [Currently Displayed]