Donna, Javier and Pereira, Pedro (2023): Rivals’ Exit and Vertical Merger Evaluation. Published in: Journal Of Competition Law & Economics , Vol. 2, No. 19 (2023): pp. 220-249.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_121045.pdf Download (756kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We discuss a subset of vertical mergers, where the exercise of market power and the efficiencies enabled by a vertical merger reduce rivals’ profits, making rivals’ exit a potentially serious concern. Rivals’ exit can fundamentally alter the welfare analysis of vertical mergers due to the reduction in product variety to consumers and the reduction in the number of competitors that would otherwise exert downward pricing pressure. An exit-inducing vertical merger might re- duce welfare even if it is a welfare-enhancing merger absent exit. We present a theoretical framework to analyze vertical mergers that focuses on the possibility and consequences of exit, discuss the antitrust implications for merger evaluation, and provide examples. We argue that the possibility of rivals’ exit should be an integral part of the analysis of vertical mergers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Rivals’ Exit and Vertical Merger Evaluation |
English Title: | Rivals’ Exit and Vertical Merger Evaluation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Antitrust, Vertical Mergers, Rivals’ Exit, Double Marginalization, Merger Evalu- ation, Competition Policy. |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K41 - Litigation Process L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L42 - Vertical Restraints ; Resale Price Maintenance ; Quantity Discounts L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L44 - Antitrust Policy and Public Enterprises, Nonprofit Institutions, and Professional Organizations |
Item ID: | 121045 |
Depositing User: | Professor Javier Donna |
Date Deposited: | 28 May 2024 14:59 |
Last Modified: | 28 May 2024 14:59 |
References: | Eric B . Rasmusen, J. Mark Ramseyer, and John S. Wiley Jr., (1991), “Naked exclusion,” American Economic Review, 1137-1145 Ilya R. Segal and Michael D. Whinston (2000), “Naked Exclusion: Comment,” American Economic Review, 90:1, 296-309, DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.1.296 Chiara Fumagalli and Massimo Motta (2006), "Exclusive Dealing and Entry, when Buyers Compete," American Economic Review, 96:3, 785-795, DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.3.785 Howard P. Marvel, (1982), “Exclusive dealing,” Journal of Law and Economics, 25:1, 1-25, DOI: 10.1086/467004 Bernheim, B. Douglas and Michael D. Whinston (1998), “Exclusive dealing,” Journal of Political Economy, 106:1, 64-103, DOI: 10.1086/250003 Donna, Javier D., Pedro Pereira, Yun Pu, André Trindade, and Renan C. Yoshida (2021), “Direct- to-Consumer Sales and Bargaining,” SSRN 3779962 Donna, Javier D. Pedro Pereira, Tiago Pires, André Trindade (2022a), “Measuring the Welfare of Intermediaries,” Management Science, 1-57 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/121045 |