A foundation for benefit-cost analysis

Zerbe, Richard (2023): A foundation for benefit-cost analysis.

Abstract

Abstract

This paper considers the evolution of cost-benefit analysis, CBA, and proposes a foundation for its current use and continued development, to be called benefit-cost analysis, BCA. In the trajectory from CBA to BCA elements of a new foundation include first a recognition that there is a Pareto justification for its use, not just a potential Pareto or KH justification. The Pareto justification applies to the whole use of BCA, rather than, as with KH, to individual projects. Second, the BCA recognizes, to a greater extent than CBA, its reliance on law to determine rights and reference points from which BCA determines gains or losses. Thus, in considering the role of law, the gain-loss disparity is recognized by BCA as is the role of law in determining rights. Third, BCA recognizes behavioral economics essentially unknown to CBA. Fourth, the proposed foundation for BCA recognizes that illegal goods or actions are not to be given standing so that the value of stolen goods to the criminal is zero, except in cases in which the very illegality of the law itself is at issue. Fifth, BCA recognizes from a theoretical viewpoint that moral and ethical sentiments should, aside from data limitations, be treated as other goods for which there is a willingness to pay or to accept. This applies to both utility weights relying on declining marginal utility with income and to equity weights relying on WTP or WTA measures. Six, BCA recognizes that actual compensation can improve welfare. Seventh, I suggest that a discount rate that combines the use of both the social rate of time preference and the opportunity cost of capital constitutes an appropriate discounting procedure. Seventh, the suggested foundation for BCA will reduce many existing criticisms of CBA.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: cost-benefit analysis; transition; history; moral sentiments; equity; immoral sentiments; discount rate; criticisms
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; K - Law and Economics > K0 - General; N - Economic History > N0 - General; N - Economic History > N0 - General > N01 - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods; N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N20 - General, International, or Comparative

References

References

Ackerman, Frank & Lesa Heinzerling, 2002, “Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection,” 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1553

Acland, D. J., & Greenberg, D. H. (2023). Distributional weighting and welfare/equity tradeoffs: a new approach. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 14(1), 68-92.

--------2004, On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing

Adler, Matthew and Eric Posner, New Foundations for Cost Benefit Analysis, Harvard University Press, 2006

-------2009, "New foundations of cost–benefit analysis: A reply to Professors Sinden, Kysar, and Driesen, Regulation & Governance 3, 72–83 doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01045.x

Baumol, William, 1968, “The Social Discount Rate”, The American Economic Review, 58 (4), 788-802

Boadway, Robin and Neil Bruce, Welfare Economics, Basil Blackwell Inc., Oxford (1984)

Burgess, David and Richard Zerbe.. (2011) , “Calculating the Social Opportunity Cost Discount Rate”, J. Benefit-Cost Analysis, vol. 2 issue 3, article 8.

-------- (2011), “The Appropriate Discount Rate to Use”, Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis, vol. 2, issue 2.

Ula Chrobak, Ula, (2022) “The Obscure Calculation Transforming Climate Policy” https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/society/2022/the-obscure-calculation-transforming-climate-policy

Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro, 1881, Mathematical psychics: An essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. No. 10. C. CITY: Kegan Paul & Company,

Gunawardena, U. A. D. “An Inquiry into Ethical Foundations of Cost Benefit Analysis” U. A. D. Prasanthi Gunawardena, 2024

Graham, John and Paul Noe, A Paradigm Shift in the Cost-Benefit State”, The Regulatory Review, 2016, https://www.theregreview.org/2016/04/26/graham-noe-shift-in-the-cost-benefit-state

Harrod, R. F. 1938, “Scope and Method of Economics”, 48 Econ. J. (1938)

Heinzerling, Lisa, 2002, “Markets for Arsenic”, 90 Geo L.J. 2311 (2002)

-------1981, “Regulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions” 107 Yale L. J. (1981)

Dehnhardt, Alexandra, Torsten Grothmann, Josephin Wagner, “Cost-benefit analysis: What limits its use in policy making and how to make it more usable? A case study on climate change adaptation in Germany”, Environmental Science & Policy ,137, 2022, pp. 53-60

Hicks, (Sir) J. R. 1939, “The Foundations of Welfare Economics”49 Econ. J., 696, 1939a

---------Value and capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939b

Just, Richard, Andrew Schmitz, Richard Zerbe, (April 2012), “Scitovsky Reversals and Practical Benefit Cost Analysis”, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, vol.3 (3).

Just, Richard, Andrew Schmitz, Zerbe, Richard O. (2013),” “Scitovsky Reversals with Normal Goods”, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, pp.411-413

Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Prospect Theory: “An Analysis of Decision under Risk,“ 47 (2), 1979, https://www.jstor.org › stable

Kaldor, Nicholas, Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility, 49 Econ. J. (1939)

Knetsch, Jack. (2020). Behavioural Economics, Benefit-Cost Analysis, and the WTP versus WTA Choice. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics. 14. 153-196. 10.1561/101.00000119.

Krahn, M., & Gafni, A. (1993). Discounting in the economic evaluation of health care interventions.Medical Care, 31, 403–418

Marglin, Stephen A. (1963) “The Opportunity Costs of Public Investment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 77, No. 2 pp. 274-289 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1884403

Nash, C and David Pearce, Charles Stanley,1975, “An Evaluation of cost-benefit analysis criteria, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 22 (2), 121-34, 1975

Nordhaus, William. (2019) “Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics,” American Economic Review 2019, 109(6).

Nussbaum, Martha, 2000, “The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost Benefit Analysis”, 20 J. Legal Stud. 1005.

Posner, Eric and Jonathan Adler, “Regulation & Governance” (2009) 3, 72–83 doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01045.x

Porter, Theodore M.,1995, Trust in Number: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life.

Richardson, Henry, S. 2000,“The Stupidity of the Cost Benefit Standard, 29 J. Legal Studies, 971 (984-85).

Robinson R. Cost-benefit analysis. BMJ. 1993 Oct 9;307(6909):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6909.924. PMID: 8241859; PMCID: PMC1679054.

Robinson LA, Hammitt JK. Behavioral Economics and the Conduct of Benefit-Cost Analysis: Towards Principles and Standards. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. 2011;2(2):1-51. doi:10.2202/2152-2812.1059

Jason F. Shogren, Seung Y. Shin, Dermot J. Hayes and James B. Kliebenstein, 1994, “Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 1 (Mar., 1994), pp. 255-270

Sinden, Amy, Kysar DA, Driesen DM (2009) Cost–Benefit Analysis: New Foundations on Shifting Sand. Regulation & Governance 3, 48–71.

Schmitz, Andrew , Richard O. Zerbe, 2008, “Scitovsky Reversals and Efficiency Criteria in Policy Analysis” Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 6(2), article 3, 2008 available at: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jafio.2008.6.2/issue-files/jafio.2008.6.issue-2.xml

Scitovsky, Tibor, 1941, “A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics”, Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), pp77-88,

Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, Volume 30. London: Her Majesty’s Treasury

Szekeres, Szabolcs (2023) “The simple answer to the Social Discount Rate question” MPRA Paper No. 117843. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117843/ (Request an updated version by email: [e-mail])

Talbott, William J., 2021, Learning from Our Mistakes: Epistemology for the Real World, Oxford University Press, 2021

Trumbull, William M. (1990), “Who Has Standing in Cost Benefit Analysis?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9 (2), pp. 201–218.

Whittington, Dale and Duncan MacRae, Jr. (1986), “The Issue of Standing in Benefit Cost Analysis,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5 (4), pp. 665–682.

Whittington, Dale and Duncan MacRae, Jr. (1990), “Judgments About Who Has Standing in Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Comment,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9 (2).

Zerbe, Richard O, 2020, “The Consent Justification for Benefit Cost Analysis”, J. of Benefit-Cost Analysis vol. 11 (2) pp. 319-340: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2020.9

-------. Is Benefit-Cost Analysis Legal: Three Rules, 1998, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 419–456.

-------“Ethical Benefit Cost Analysis as Art and Science: Ten Rules for Benefit-Cost Analysis,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change 12(1), 73-106, 2009.

-------. (2014) “Welfare Economics Applied to Law with Costly Markets" in. Efficiency in Law and Economics, (editor, R. Zerbe, Series Editors: Richard Posner and Francesco Parisi), Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Northampton, MA:

-------. (2013, ), “Ethical benefit–cost analysis as art and science—ten rules for benefit–cost analysis” in Zerbe, Richard O. & Scott Farrow, (eds) Principles for Benefit Cost Analysis, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar

------- (2001). ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY IN LAW AND ECONOMICS. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

---------2006) “Justice and the Evolution of the Common Law,” The Journal of Law, Economics & Policy 3(1) pp. 81-122.

-------. (Winter 1991). “Comment: Does Benefit Cost Analysis Stand Alone? Rights and Standing,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(1), 96-105

-------. (2009). “Ethical Benefit Cost Analysis as Art and Science: Ten Rules for Benefit-Cost Analysis,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change 12(1), 73-106.

-------. (Fall 2007). “The Legal Foundation of Cost-Benefit Analysis,” Charleston Law Review, 2(1), 93-184.

-------. (2002). “Can Law and Economics Stand the Purchase of Moral Satisfaction?” Research in Law and Economics, 20, 135-172.

------- (1998). “Is Benefit Cost Analysis Legal? Three Rules,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(3), 419-456.

------- (Winter 1991). “Comment: Does Benefit Cost Analysis Stand Alone? Rights and Standing,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(1), 96-105

Zerbe, Richard O. Yoram Bauman, Aaron Finkle, “An Aggregate Measure for Benefit Cost Analysis, 58 Ecological Economics, 449 (2006).

Zerbe, Richard O. and Linda Graham (1999). “The Role of Rights in Benefit Cost Methodology: The Example of Salmon and Hydroelectric Dams,” University of Washington Law Review, 74(3), 763-797.

Zuber, Stéphane & Marc Fleurbaey The Institute for Futures Studies. Discounting and Intergenerational Ethics, Working Paper 2019:6 115 2