Sztachera, Maciej (2024): Hours, wages, and multipliers.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_121556.pdf Download (738kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The quantitative HANK model, incorporating the coordination of hours worked in production, yields an improved empirical fit along two dimensions: a more concentrated steady-state distribution of hours worked and lower marginal propensities to earn (MPEs) with positive but moderate fiscal multipliers for separable preferences. In the model, failing to coordinate work hours with coworkers leads to wage penalties, and labor earnings display decreasing returns to hours. Consequently, households prefer working hours closer to the average and adjust their hours less in response to idiosyncratic shocks than in the standard model. Aggregate shocks increase optimal hours for all employees, and the coordination friction does not bind. The model matches the empirical estimates of the idiosyncratic and aggregate Frisch elasticities.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Hours, wages, and multipliers |
English Title: | Hours, wages, and multipliers |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Coordination, fiscal multipliers, HANK trilemma, hours |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H31 - Household H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H32 - Firm |
Item ID: | 121556 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Maciej Sztachera |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jul 2024 11:59 |
Last Modified: | 27 Jul 2024 11:59 |
References: | Aaronson, D. and French, E. (2004). The effect of part-time work on wages: Evidence from the social security rules. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(2):329–352. Aiyagari, S. and McGrattan, E. R. (1998). The optimum quantity of debt. Journal of Monetary Economics, 42(3):447–469. Auclert, A., Bardóczy, B., and Rognlie, M. (2023). MPCs, MPEs, and multipliers: A trilemma for New Keynesian models. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(3):700–712. Auclert, A., Bardóczy, B., Rognlie, M., and Straub, L. (2021). Using the Sequence-Space Jacobian to solve and estimate heterogeneous-agent models. Econometrica, 89(5):2375– 2408. Auclert, A. and Rognlie, M. (2020). Inequality and Aggregate Demand. NBER Working Papers 24280, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Bartik, A.W., Broockman, D. E., Miller, S., Rhodes, E., and Vivalt, E. (2024). The employment effects of a guaranteed income: Experimental evidence from two U.S. states. Working Paper 32719, National Bureau of Economic Research. Battisti, M., Michaels, R., and Park, C. (2024). Labor supply within the firm. Journal of Labor Economics, 42(2):511–548. Bhandari, A., Bourany, T., Evans, D., and Golosov, M. (2023). A perturbational approach for approximating heterogeneous agent models. Working Paper 31744, National Bureau of Economic Research. Bick, A., Blandin, A., and Rogerson, R. (2022). Hours and wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(3):1901–1962. Carroll, C. (2006). The method of endogenous gridpoints for solving dynamic stochastic optimization problems. Economics Letters, 91(3):312–320. Cesarini, D., Lindqvist, E., Notowidigdo, M. J., and Östling, R. (2017). The effect of wealth on individual and household labor supply: Evidence from Swedish lotteries. American Economic Review, 107(12):3917–46. Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., and Weber, A. (2011). Are micro and macro labor supply elasticities consistent? A review of evidence on the intensive and extensive margins. American Economic Review, 101(3):471–75. Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., and Weber, A. (2013). Does indivisible labor explain the difference between micro and macro elasticities? A meta-analysis of extensive margin elasticities. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 27:1–56. Cubas, G., Juhn, C., and Silos, P. (2021). Work-care balance over the day and the gender wage gap. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111:149–53. Cubas, G., Juhn, C., and Silos, P. (2022). Coordinated Work Schedules and the Gender Wage Gap. The Economic Journal, 133(651):1036–1066. Fagereng, A., Holm, M. B., and Natvik, G. J. (2021). MPC heterogeneity and household balance sheets. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(4):1–54. Farber, H. S., Herbst, D., Kuziemko, I., and Naidu, S. (2021). Unions and inequality over the twentieth century: New evidence from survey data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(3):1325–1385. Ferraro, D. and Valaitis, V. (2024). Consumption Quality and Employment Across the Wealth Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies. Gerke, R., Giesen, S., Lozej, M., and Röttger, J. (2024). On household labour supply in stickywage HANK models. Discussion Papers 01/2024, Deutsche Bundesbank. Golosov, M., Graber, M., Mogstad, M., and Novgorodsky, D. (2023). How Americans respond to idiosyncratic and exogenous changes in household wealth and unearned income. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pages 1321–1395. Havránek, T. (2015). Measuring intertemporal substitution: The importance of method choices and selective reporting. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(6):1180–1204. Hazell, J., Herreño, J., Nakamura, E., and Steinsson, J. (2022). The slope of the Phillips curve: Evidence from U.S. states. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(3):1299–1344. Imbens, G. W., Rubin, D. B., and Sacerdote, B. I. (2001). Estimating the effect of unearned income on labor earnings, savings, and consumption: Evidence from a survey of lottery players. American Economic Review, 91(4):778–794. Jappelli, T. and Pistaferri, L. (2010). The consumption response to income changes. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1):479–506. Johnson, D. S., Parker, J. A., and Souleles, N. S. (2006). Household expenditure and the income tax rebates of 2001. American Economic Review, 96(5):1589–1610. Keane, M. and Rogerson, R. (2015). Reconciling micro and macro labor supply elasticities: A structural perspective. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1):89–117. Krueger, D., Mitman, K., and Perri, F. (2016). Macroeconomics and household heterogeneity. volume 2 of Handbook of Macroeconomics, chapter 11, pages 843–921. Elsevier. Kuhn, M., Luo, J., Manovskii, I., and Qiu, X. (2023). Coordinated firm-level work processes and macroeconomic resilience. Journal of Monetary Economics, 137:107–127. McKay, A., Nakamura, E., and Steinsson, J. (2016). The power of forward guidance revisited. American Economic Review, 106(10):3133–58. Pencavel, J. (2015). The productivity of working hours. The Economic Journal, 125(589):2052– 2076. Ramey, V. A. (2019). Ten years after the Financial Crisis: What have we learned from the renaissance in fiscal research? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2):89–114. Ramey, V. A. and Zubairy, S. (2018). Government spending multipliers in good times and in bad: Evidence from US historical data. Journal of Political Economy, 126(2):850–901. Shao, L., Sohail, F., and Yurdagul, E. (2023). Are working hours complements in production? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 153:104696. Song, J., Price, D. J., Guvenen, F., Bloom, N., and vonWachter, T. (2018). Firming up inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(1):1–50. Yurdagul, E. (2017). Production complementarities and flexibility in a model of entrepreneurship. Journal of Monetary Economics, 86:36–51. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/121556 |