Ogawa, Akinobu and Kondoh, Haruo (2024): How Does Intergovernmental Competition through the Hometown Tax Donation System Affect Local Government Efficiency?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_121688.pdf Download (441kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Many studies show that fiscal redistribution among regions carried out by a national government undermines the cost efficiency of local governments. In Japan, a unique fiscal system, the Hometown Tax Donation (HTD) system, was launched in 2008. Citizens may donate some of their inhabitant taxes to a different local government than their own. We examine the effects of the HTD using panel data of Japanese municipalities and stochastic frontier analysis. We find that revenue received by other regions leads to a misestimation of the cost of public services, even if this redistribution is based on residents’ intentions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | How Does Intergovernmental Competition through the Hometown Tax Donation System Affect Local Government Efficiency? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cost efficiency of local governments; Intergovernmental fiscal transfer; Donation of inhabitant tax; Hometown tax donation system (HTD) |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H27 - Other Sources of Revenue H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue |
Item ID: | 121688 |
Depositing User: | Akinobu Ogawa |
Date Deposited: | 17 Aug 2024 14:21 |
Last Modified: | 17 Aug 2024 14:21 |
References: | Aiello, F., Bonanno, G., 2019. Explaining differences in efficiency: A meta-study on local government literature. J. Econ. Surv. 33, 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12310. Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, P., 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models. J. Econ. 6, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5. Akai, N., Sato, M., Yamashita, K., 2003. Economics of local allocation tax. Yuhikaku, Tokyo. (in Japanese). Ashworth, J., Geys, B., Heyndels, B., Wille, F., 2014. Competition in the political arena and local government performance. Appl. Econ. 46, 2264–2276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.899679. Ayala-García, J., Dall’erba, S., 2021. The natural resource curse: Evidence from the Colombian municipalities. Pap. Reg. Sci. 100, 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12577. Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Brun-Martos, M.I., Márquez-Ramos, L., Prior, D., 2019. Local government efficiency: Determinants and spatial interdependence. Appl. Econ. 51, 1478–1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1527458. Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Prior, D., Tortosa-Ausina, E., 2010. Decentralization and efficiency of local government. Ann. Reg. Sci. 45, 571–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0286-7. Battese, G.E., Coelli, T.J., 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Econ. 20, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442. Bessho, S., 2017. How should we improve the gaps of local public finances among local governments? Chuo Koron. 3, 76–83. (in Japanese). Borge, L.E., Falch, T.F., Tovmo, P., 2008. Public sector efficiency: The roles of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity, and democratic participation. Public Choice. 136, 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9309-7. Borge, L.E., Parmer, P.P., Torvik, R., 2015. Local natural resource curse? J. Public Econ. 131, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.002. Coelli, T., Henningsen, A., 2013. Frontier: Stochastic frontier analysis, R package version 1.1-0. http://CRAN.R-Project.org/package= frontier. Costa-Font, J., De-Albuquerque, F., Doucouliagos, H., 2015. Does interjurisdictional competition engender a “race to the bottom’? A meta-regression analysis. Econ. Pol. 27, 488–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12066. De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., 1996. Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 26, 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02127-2. De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., Moesen, W., Vanneste, J., 1994. Explaining differences in productive efficiency: An application to Belgian municipalities. Public Choice. 80, 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053225. “What to do with your hometown in the battle of gratuities?” Toyo Keizai. http://toyokeizai.net/articles/50954 (in Japanese). Eom, T.H., Rubenstein, R., 2006. Do state-funded property tax exemptions increase local government inefficiency? An analysis of New York State’s STAR program. Public Budg. Fin. 26, 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2006.00839.x. Fukasawa, E., 2021. Impact on local government efficiency due to acceptance of the Hometown Tax Donation System in Japan: From the perspective of reduction in technical efficiency caused by “financial illusion.” Reference. 848, 1–30. (in Japanese). Fukasawa, E., Fukasawa, T., Ogawa, H., 2020. Intergovernmental competition for donations: The case of the Furusato Nozei Program in Japan. J. Asian Econ. 67, 101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101178. Geys, B., 2006. Looking across borders: A test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings. J. Urban Econ. 60, 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.04.002. Geys, B., Heinemann, F., Kalb, A., 2010. Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: Evidence from German municipalities. Eur. J. Pol. Econ. 26, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.002. Geys, B., Moesen, W., 2009a. Measuring local government technical (in)efficiency: An application and comparison of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 32, 499–513. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320401. Geys, B., Moesen, W., 2009b. Exploring sources of local government technical inefficiency: Evidence from Flemish municipalities. Public Fin. Manag. 9, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/152397210900900101. Hashimoto, K., 2019. Hometown tax payment system and fiscal relations between central and local governments. Kansai Univ. Econ. Theor. Collect. 69, 1–23. (in Japanese). Hatfield, J.W., Kosec, K., 2013. Federal competition and economic growth. J. Public Econ. 97, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.08.005. Kalb, A., 2009. What determines local governments’ technical efficiency? The case of road maintenance. ZBW Discussion Paper Number 09047. Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim. Kalb, A., 2010. The impact of intergovernmental grants on cost efficiency: Theory and evidence from German municipalities. Econ. Anal. Policy. 40, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(10)50002-X. Karakaplan, M.U., Kutlu, L., 2017. Endogeneity in panel stochastic frontier models: An application to the Japanese cotton spinning industry. Appl. Econ. 49, 5935–5939. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363861. Kato, H., Yanagihara, K., 2021. Gift competition in the “Furusato Nozei system’: A theoretical approach in the framework of tax competition. Stud. Reg. Sci. 51, 176–195. Lampe, H.W., Hilgers, D., Ihl, C., 2015. Does accrual accounting improve municipalities’ efficiency? Evidence from Germany. Appl. Econ. 47, 4349–4363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1030562. Meeusen, W., van den Broeck, J., 1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. Int. Econ. Rev. 18, 435–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757. Nakazawa, K., 2013. Cost inefficiency of municipalities after amalgamation. Procedia Econ. Fin. 5, 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00068-3. Nishimura, Y., Ishimura, T., Akai, N., 2017. Analysis on incentives of hometown tax payment: Empirical analysis using donation acceptance data of municipalities, in: Japan Association of Local Public Finance (Ed.), pp. 150–178. (in Japanese). Oates, W.E., 1972. Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. Santolini, R., 2020. Spatial effects on Local Government efficiency. Pap. Reg. Sci. 99, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12475. Sato, M., 2017. “Remove gift in return from subjects covered by tax deduction, nikkei newspaper.” Nihon Keizai Shimbun, April 7. (in Japanese). Silkman, R., Young, D.R., 1982. X-efficiency and state formula grants. Natl Tax J. 35, 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41862452. Tiebout, C.M., 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. J. Pol. Econ. 64, 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839. Turati, G., Boetti, L., Piacenza, M., 2012. Decentralization and local governments’ performance: How does fiscal autonomy affect spending efficiency? FinanzArchiv. 68, 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522112X653840. Vanden Eeckhaut, P., Tulkens, H., Jamar, M.A., 1993. Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities, in: Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, S.S. (Eds.). The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 300–340. Worthington, A.C., 2000. Cost efficiency in Australian Local Government: A comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometric approaches. Financ. Acc. Manag. 16, 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00105. Yamamura, E., Tsutsui, Y., Ohtake, F., 2023. An analysis of altruistic and selfish motivations underlying hometown tax donations in Japan. Jpn. Econ. Rev. 74, 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-021-00083-x. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/121688 |