Are Preferences For Environmental Quality Sensitive to Financial Funding Schemes? Evidence from a Marine Restoration Programme in the Black Sea

Remoundou, Kyriaki and Adaman, Fikret and Koundouri, Phoebe and Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. (2011): Are Preferences For Environmental Quality Sensitive to Financial Funding Schemes? Evidence from a Marine Restoration Programme in the Black Sea. Published in:

Abstract

This paper uses a non-market valuation study to elicit consumers’ preferences for a marine restoration programme in the Black Sea aiming to reduce the level of public health risk from bathing and improve water quality and the overall level of marine biodiversity. In this context, we administer a stated choice experiment in coastal settlements in Ukraine and Turkey and employ two tax revenue reallocation schemes as payment vehicles. One proposes the financing of the marine restoration programme by the reduction of the public budget for renewable energy and the second by the reduction of the public budget on training for civil servants. We examine the stated preferences and the subsequently derived economic value estimates in the two treatments with the aim to investigate whether the trade-off implied by the funding scheme has implications for the valuation outcome. Results reveal that preferences and marginal rates of substitution between the non-price attributes under consideration differ significantly. In the civil servants’ budget reallocation scheme, the reallocation coefficient is positive, implying that ceteris paribus redistribution of public financial resources from this source is utility-enhancing. The magnitude of the results differs in the two considered countries mirroring their heterogeneity in political and cultural dimensions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Non-market valuation, stated choice experiment, payment vehicle, tax revenues reallocation, marine resources, Black Sea, marine biodiversity, developing countries
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets; N - Economic History > N9 - Regional and Urban History; P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P48 - Political Economy ; Legal Institutions ; Property Rights ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Regional Studies; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis

References

Adaman, Fikret , Nihan Karalı, Gurkan Kumbaroglu, İlhan Or, Begum Özkaynak, and Ünal Zengonobuz. 2011. “What determines urban households’ willingness to pay for CO2 emission reductions in Turkey: A contingent valuation survey.” Energy Policy 39:689-98.

Barbier, Edward B. 2005. Natural Resources and Economic Development. Cambridge University Press

Bateman, Ian J., Richard T. Carson, Brett Day, Michael Hanemann, Nick Hanley, Tanis Hett, Michael Jones-Lee, Graham Loomes, Susana Mourato, Ece Özdemiroğlu, David Pearce, Robert Sugden and John Swanson. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Bennett, Jeff and Ekin Birol, eds, 2010. Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Implementation, Challenges and Policy Implications. Edward Elgar

Bergstrom, John C., Kevin J. Boyle and Mitsuyasu Yabe. 2004. “Trading taxes vs. taying taxes to value and finance public environmental goods.” Environmental and Resource Economics 28:533–49.

Black Sea Commission (BSC), 2009. Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black Sea (2002-2007). Publications of the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution (BSC), 2009-1, Istanbul, Turkey, 247 pp.

Black Sea Commission (BSC), 2008. State of the Environment of the Black Sea (2001 - 2006/7). Edited by Temel Oguz. Publications of the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution (BSC) 2008-3, Istanbul, Turkey, 448 pp.

Brown, Thomas C., Patricia A Champ, Richard C. Bishop and Daniel W. McCollum, 1996. “Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?” Land Economics 72: 152-166.

Carlsson, Frederik, Peter Frykblom and Carolina Liljenstolpe. 2003. “Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments.” Ecological Economics 47: 95-103.

Carlsson, F. and P. Martinsson. 2003. “Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics.” Health Economics 12, 281-294.

Carlsson, F., Kataria, M., Lampi, E., 2010. “Dealing with ignored attributes in choice experiments on valuation of Sweden’s environmental quality objectives." Environmental and Resource Economics 47:65–89.

Carlsson, F, Frykblom , P., Lagerkvist, C.J., 2009. “Preferences with and without prices - does the price attribute affect behavior in stated preference surveys?” Environmental and Resource Economics 38:155–164.

Champ, Patricia A. and Richard C. Bishop. 2001. “Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19:383–402.

Cummings, Ronald G., David Brookshire and William D. Schulze (eds). 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.

Cummings, Ronald D. and Laura Osborne Taylor. 1998. “Does Realism Matter in Contingent Valuation Surveys?” Land Economics 74(2): 203-15.

DeShazo, J.R. and German Fermo. 2002. “Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44:123-43.

Dhar, Ravi, and Itamar Simpson. 2003. “The effect of forced choice on choice.” Journal of Marketing Research 40:146–60.

European Commission (2009). Progress Report on Turkey 2009, Brussels.

European Environment Agency (EEA), 2000. State and Pressures of the Marine and Coastal Mediterranean Environment. Technical Report. Copenhagen, Denmark.

European Science Foundation (ESF), 2007. Impacts of Climate Change on the European Marine and Coastal Environment, Ecosystems Approach. Marine Board Position Paper 9

European Social Survey, 2004. Available online at: http://nesstar.ess.nsd.uib.no/webview/ , last accessed on November 2010.

Garrod, Guy, and Kenneth G. Willis. 1999. Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Georgiou, Stavros, Dale Whittington, David pearce and Dominic Moran (Eds). 1997. Economic Values and the Environment in the Developing World. Edward Elgar Publishing, United Nations Environment Programme 1997.

Heileman, S., W. Parr, and G. Volovik. 2008. Chapter V-8 Black Sea LME in Sherman, K. and Hempel, G. (Eds). The UNEP Large Marine Ecosystem Report: A perspective on changing conditions in LMEs of the world’s Regional Seas. UNEP Regional Seas, Report and Studies No. 182. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya, pp 839.

Horowitz John K. and Kenneth E. McConnel. 2002. “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 426-47. International Energy Agency, 2008. Available online at: http://www.iea.org/country/index.asp , last accessed on November 2010.

International Commission of Independent Experts, 2010. Proposals for Ukraine: 2010 – Time for reforms, Kyiv.

Ivehammar, Pernilla. 2009. “The Payment Vehicle Used in CV Studies of Environmental Goods Does Matter.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 34(3):450–63.

Jacobsen Jette Bredahl, Thomas Hedemark Lundhede, Louise Martinsen, Berit Hasler and Bo Jellesmark Thorsen, 2011 “Embedding effects in choice experiment valuations of environmental preservation projects.” Ecological Economics, forthcoming.

Jacobsen, J.B., Thorsen, B.J., 2010. “Preferences for site and environmental functions when selecting forthcoming national parks.” Ecological Economics 69:1532–44.

Kataria, Mitesh. 2009. “Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers.” Energy Economics 31:69–76.

Kontoleon, Andreas, Mitsuyasu Yabe and Laura Darby. 2005. “Alternative payment vehicles in contingent valuation: The case of genetically-modified foods.” MPRA Paper No. 1827, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Krinsky, Itzahak and Leslie A. Robb.1986. “On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4):715–19.

Lew, D.K. and Wallmo, K, 2011, “External Tests of Scope and Embedding in Stated Preference Choice Experiments: An Application to Endangered Species Valuation”. Environmental and Resource Economics 48:1-23

Lichtenstein, Sarah, and Slovic, Paul, eds. 2006. The Construction of Preference. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.

Luisetti, T. Barteman, I.J. and K.R. Turner, 2011. “Testing the Fundamental Assumption of Choice Experiments: Are Values Absolute or Relative?” Land Economics 87:284-96.

Mangham, Lindsay J., Kara Hanson and Barbara McPake. 2009. “How to do (or not to do) . . . Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.” Health Policy and Planning 24:151–58.

Meyerhoff, Jurgen and Ulf Liebe 2009. “Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity.” Land Economics 85: 515-528

Mitchell, Robert Cameron and Richard T. Carson.1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington: John Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.

Morrison, Mark D., Russell K. Blamey and Jeffrey W. Bennett. 2000. “Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 16: 407–22.

Narrain, Urvashi, Shreekant Gupta and Klaas van't Veld. 2008. “Poverty and the environment: Exploring the relationship between household incomes, private assets, and natural assets.” Land Economics 84(1):148-167

Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. and Chiara M. Travisi. 2009. “Comparing Tax and Tax Reallocation Payments in Financing Rail Noise Abatement Programmes: Results from a Stated Choice Valuation Study in Italy.” Environmental and Resource Economics 43(4):503-517.

Søren Bøye Olsen, Thomas Hedemark Lundhede, Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, Bo Jellesmark Thorsen 2011. “Tough and Easy Choices: Testing the Influence of Utility.

Difference on Stated Certainty-in-Choice in Choice Experiments”, Environmental and Resource Economics, forthcoming.

Payne J.W., Bettman, J.R, Schkade, D.A., 1999. “Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19:243-70.

Poe, Gregory L., Kelly L. Giraud and John B. Loomis. 2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353–365.

Remoundou, Kyriaki, Phoebe Koundouri, Areti Kontogianni, Paulo A.L.D Nunes and Michalis Skourtos. 2009. “Valuation of Natural Marine Ecosystems: An Economic Perspective.” Environmental Science & Policy 12:1040-51.

Renewable Development Initiative of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2006a. Turkey, Country Profile. Available online at: http://ebrdrenewables.com/sites/renew/countries/turkey/profile.aspx, last accessed on November 2010

Renewable Development Initiative of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2006b. Ukraine, Country Profile. Available online at: http://ebrdrenewables.com/sites/renew/countries/Ukraine/default.aspx, last accessed on November 2010

Rolfe, J., Bennett, J., Louviere, J., 2002. “Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: Testing for framing effects with choice modelling.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46:1–20.

Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. and Train, K. (2008). “Utility in willingness to pay space: A tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90, 994-1010.

Shapansky Bradford, Wiktor L. Adamowicz and Peter C. Boxall. 2008. “Assessing information provision and respondent involvement effects on preferences.” Ecological Economics 65:626–635.

Swait, Joffre and Jordan Louviere. 1993. “The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30(3): 305–314.

Teelucksingh, Sonja S. and Paulo.A.L.D Nunes. 2010. Biodiversity Valuation in Development Countries: A focus on Small Island Developing States (SIDS). FEEM Note di Lavoro 2010.111

Transparency International. 2010a. 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index, available online at: http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/results, last accessed on November 2010.

Transparency International. 2010b. 2009 Global Corruption Parameters, available online at: http://www.transparency.org/, last accessed on May 2010.

Tversky Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211: 453-58.

United Nations Statistics Division. 2010. Available online at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm, last accessed December 2010.

Wiser, Ryan H. 2007. “Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable Energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles.” Ecological Economics 62:419–32.

World Bank. 2010. World Development Indicators. Washington DC.