Evaluating the TIS's knowledge production function using patent data: A multi-criteria approach applied to the technological bricks of the hydrogen storage

Flamand, Marina and Frigant, Vincent and Miollan, Stéphane and Dimitrova, Zlatina and Sauve, Henri (2024): Evaluating the TIS's knowledge production function using patent data: A multi-criteria approach applied to the technological bricks of the hydrogen storage.

Abstract

At the heart of the Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) approach is the knowledge production function. Its evaluation requires the study and characterization of the TIS knowledge base and its evolution. Although patents are often used to study this knowledge production function, current techniques for mobilizing these data can be improved. In this article, we propose to work in two directions. Firstly, most studies focus on a singular knowledge base associated with the focal TIS. However, the knowledge spaces associated with a technology are themselves plural, comprising a variety of constituent elements that must be considered separately. In this way, we have broken down the knowledge base required to develop the focal TIS into different technological building blocks. These building blocks have been classified according to three different levels of analysis: type of technological solution, challenges to be met and field of application. Secondly, most studies measure the knowledge production function by the number of patents applications. However, the sheer volume of patents is a biased indicator. A more comprehensive approach to patent analysis is recommended, based on cross-checking several indicators to ensure the accuracy of patent statistics. From this perspective, we evaluate three sets of patent indicators - persistence, commitment, and coherence - to determine, for each subset, whether there is a sufficient level of knowledge created to promote the development of the TIS. All in all, this article proposes a new method of multi-criteria analysis of the knowledge production function in four stages. The relevance and operability of this method is illustrated in the case of hydrogen storage TIS.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Technological Innovation System, Knowledge production, Metrics, Patent, Hydrogen storage technologies
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation

References

Ahn S.J., Yoon H.Y. (2020), ‘Green chasm’ in clean-tech for air pollution: Patent evidence of a long innovation cycle and a technological level gap, Journal of Cleaner Production, 272(1): DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122726.

Altuntas S., Dereli T., Kusiak A. (2015), Forecasting technology success based on patent data, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96: 202-214.

Arora A., Fosfuri A., Gambardella A. (2004), Markets for Technology; The Economics of innovation and Corporate Strategy, Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.

Bakker S. (2010), Hydrogen patent portfolios in the automotive industry-the search for promising storage methods, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(13): 6784-6793.

Bakker S., Budde B. (2012), Technological hype and disappointment: lessons from the hydrogen and fuel cell case, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(6): 549-563.

Benson C.L., Magee C.L. (2013), A hybrid keyword and patent class methodology for selecting relevant sets of patents for a technological field Scientometrics, 96(1): 69-82.

Benson C.L., Magee, C.L. (2015), Quantitative determination of technological improvement from patent data, PloS ONE, 10(4): e0121635.

Berg S., Wustmans M., Bröring S. (2019), Identifying first signals of emerging dominance in a technological innovation system: A novel approach based on patents, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146: 706-722.

Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Carlsson B., Lindmark S., Rickne A. (2008), Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis, Research Policy, 37(3): 407-429.

Bergek A. (2019), “Technological innovation systems: a review of recent findings and suggestions for future research”, in Boons F. and McMeekin A. (eds), Handbook of Sustainable Innovation, Edward Elgar: 200-2018.

Blind K., Edler J., Frietsch R., Schmoch, U. (2006), Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany, Research Policy, 35(5): 655-672.

Blind K., Cremers K., Mueller E. (2009), The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios, Research Policy, 38(2): 428-436.

Bockris, J. (2013), The hydrogen economy: Its history, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(6): 2579-2588.

Chen C., Qi X., Shuaiming F., Qibin L. (2021), A novel solar hydrogen production system integrating high temperature electrolysis with ammonia based thermochemical energy storage, Energy Conversion and Management, 237, DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114143

Cohen W.M., Nelson R., Walsh J.P. (2000), Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not), National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, n°7552, DOI: 10.3386/w7552

CSIRO (2021), Global Priorities in Support of Clean Hydrogen Industry Development, Report CSIRO, Retrieved from https://research.csiro.au/hyresource/wp-content/uploads/sites/378/2021/10/21-00418_EN_WORD_Report_HyrdrogenResearchDevelopmentInnovation_FINAL_CLEAN.pdf , 10/07/2023.

De Rassenfosse G., Guellec D., Potterie, B.P. (2008), Motivations to Patent: Empirical Evidence from an International Survey. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.490.1294&rep=rep1&type=pdf

De Rassenfosse, G., Guellec, D. (2009), Quality versus quantity: Strategic interactions and the patent inflation, Paper presented at the EPIP Association Conference, Bologna.

Dosi, G. (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.

Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, et al. (eds) (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Frances Pinter.

Epicoco M., Oltra V., Saint Jean M. (2014), Knowledge dynamics and sources of eco-innovation: Mapping the Green Chemistry community, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81: 388-402.

EPO & OECD/IEA, 2023, Hydrogen patents for a clean energy future, Report from the EPO/OECD/IEA, January, Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/hydrogen-patents-for-a-clean-energy-future

Flamand M. (2016) Studying strategic choices of carmakers in the development of energy storage solutions: a patent analysis, Int. J. Automotive Technology and Management, 16(2), 169-192.

Frigant V., Miollan S., Presse M., Virapin D. (2019), What are the geographic delineations of a technological innovation system? An analysis of carmakers’ fuel cell vehicle co-patents’ portfolios, Innovations, (1): 243-273.

Furtado A.T., Hekkert M.P., Negro S.O. (2020), Of actors, functions, and fuels: Exploring a second generation ethanol transition from a technological innovation systems perspective in Brazil, Energy Research & Social Science, 70, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101706

Garud, R., Kumaraswamy A., Karnøe P., (2010), Path Dependence or Path Creation?, Journal of Management Studies, 47(4): 761-774.

Granstrand O. (1999), Strategic Management of Intellectual Property. CIM Working Paper 1999(01).

Griliches Z. (1990), Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661-1707.

Hall and Trajenberg, Uncovering General Purpose Technologies with Patent Data, in Cristiano Antonelli, Dominique Foray, Bronwyn H. Hall, and W. Edward Steinmueller (eds.), New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology, EdwardEdgar.

Haupt R., Kloyer M., Lange M. (2007), Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development, Research Policy, 36(3): 387-398.

Hekkert M.P., Suurs R.A., Negro S.O., Kuhlmann S., Smits R.E. (2007), Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432.

Henderson R., Clark, K. (1990), Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9-30.

IEA (2021), Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector, Report from the International Energy Agency, Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.

IRENA (2022), Geopolitics of the Energy Transformation: The Hydrogen Factor, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Available at: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2022/Jan/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transformation-Hydrogen

IRENA (2023), World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5°C Pathway: Volume 1, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, Available at: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Jun/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023

Jaffe A., de Rassenfosse G. (2017), Patent Citation Data in Social Science Research: Overview and Best Practices, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(6): 1360-1374.

Kao Y.S., Nawata K., Huang C.Y. (2019), Systemic functions evaluation based technological innovation system for the sustainability of IoT in the manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 11(8): 2342.

Kieft A., Harmsen R., Hekkert M.P. (2021), Heat pumps in the existing Dutch housing stock: An assessment of its Technological Innovation System, Sustainable Energy Technologies and assessments, 44, 101064, DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101064

König B., Janker J., Reinhardt T., Villarroel M., Junge R. (2018), Analysis of aquaponics as an emerging technological innovation system, Journal of cleaner production, 180: 232-243.

Lamb K., Dolan M.D., Kennedy D.K. (2019), Ammonia for hydrogen storage: A review of catalytic ammonia decomposition and hydrogen separation and purification, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(7): 3580-3593

Kushnir D., Hansen T., Vogl V., Åhman M. (2020), Adopting hydrogen direct reduction for the Swedish steel industry: A technological innovation system (TIS) study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118185, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118185.

Lundvall B-A (ed.), (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter: London.

Makepeace J.W, He T., Weidenthaler C., Jensen T.R., Chang F., Vegge T., Ngene P., Kojima Y., de Jongh P.E., Chen P., David W., (2019), Reversible ammonia-based and liquid organic hydrogen carriers for high-density hydrogen storage: Recent progress, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(15): 7746-7767.

Malerba F., (2002), Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 31:247–264.

Malhotra A., Schmidt T.S., Huenteler J. (2019), The role of inter-sectoral learning in knowledge development and diffusion: Case studies on three clean energy technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146: 464-487.

Malloupas G., Ioannou C., Yfantis E.A. (2022), A Review of the Latest Trends in the Use of Green Ammonia as an Energy Carrier in Maritime Industry, Energies, 15(4): 1453.

Markard J., Raven R., Truffer B. (2012), Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects, Research Policy, 41(6): 955-967.

Markard, J. (2020), The life cycle of technological innovation systems, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045.

Meng D., Li X., Cai Y., Shi, J. (2019), Patterns of knowledge development and diffusion in the global autonomous vehicle technological innovation system: a patent-based analysis. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 19(1-2): 144-177.

Musiolik J., Markard J. (2011), Creating and shaping innovation systems: Formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany, Energy Policy, 39(4): 1909-1922.

Phirouzabadi A.M., Savage D., Blackmore K., Juniper J. (2020), The evolution of dynamic interactions between the knowledge development of powertrain systems, Transport Policy,93: 1-16.

Porter M.E. (2001), The value chain and competitive advantage. Understanding Business Processes, 2: 50-66.

Rifkin J. (2002). The Hydrogen Economy: The Creation of the Worldwide Energy Web and the Redistribution of Power on Earth, Wiley: London.

Stephan A., Schmidt T.S., Bening C.R., Hoffmann V.H. (2017), The sectoral configuration of technological innovation systems: Patterns of knowledge development and diffusion in the lithium-ion battery technology in Japan, Research Policy, 46(4): 709-723.

Suurs R.A., Hekkert M.P. (2009), Competition between first and second generation technologies: Lessons from the formation of a biofuels innovation system in the Netherlands, Energy, 34(5): 669-679.

Trajtenberg M. (1987), Patents, citations and innovations: Tracing the links, NBER Working Paper, n°2457, December, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=233719

Tushman M.L. Rosenkopf L., (1992), Organizational determinants of technological change: towards a sociology of technological evolution, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14: 311–347.

Veer T., Jell F. (2012), Contributing to markets for technology ? A comparison of patent filing motives of individual inventors, small companies and universities, Technovation, 32(9): 513-522.

Vroon T., Teunissen E., Drent M., Negro S.O., van Sark W.G. (2021), Escaping the niche market: An innovation system analysis of the Dutch building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) sector, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 155(C), DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111912.