Acosta, Manuel and Coronado, Daniel and Ferrándiz, Esther and Marín, M. Rosario and Moreno, Pedro J. (2020): Civil-Military Patents and Technological Knowledge Flows into the Leading Defense Firms. Published in: Armed Forces & Society , Vol. 3, No. 46 (2020): pp. 454-474.
PDF
MPRA_paper_123080.pdf Download (465kB) |
Abstract
Drawing upon 106,181 patent applications by the world’s largest defense firms and 241,571 patent citations (2002-2011), this paper has two main objectives. The first is to explore the factors affecting the production of mixed patents (those with potential dual applications in both military and civilian spheres). The second is to identify the causes of the use of military knowledge for civilian inventions (spin off) and the use of civilian knowledge in military patented technologies (spin in). Our calculations show highly significant coefficients for the variables capturing the “military technological capability” and the size of the company in explaining the production of mixed technologies. The spin off process is affected by the military technological capability, the size of the firm and the location. The spin in mechanism is explained by the military technological capability and the location of the firm, while the size of the company is not relevant.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Civil-Military Patents and Technological Knowledge Flows into the Leading Defense Firms |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | dual use, mixed technologies, military patents, defense industry, patent citations, spin-off, spin-in |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives |
Item ID: | 123080 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Daniel Coronado |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jan 2025 08:33 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2025 09:53 |
References: | Acosta, M., & Coronado, D. (2003). Science–technology flows in Spanish regions. Research Policy, 32, 1783-1803. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Marín, R. (2011). Potential dual-use of military technology: Does citing patents shed light on this process? Defence and Peace Economics, 22, 335-349. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Marín, R., & Prats, P. (2013). Factors affecting the diffusion of patented military technology in the field of weapons and ammunition. Scientometrics, 94(1), 1-22. Alic, J., Branscomb, L., Brooks, H., Carter, A., & Epstein, G. (1992). Beyond spinoff: Military and commercial technologies in a changing world. Foreign Affairs, 71(4), 204. Anteroinen, J. (2010). Enhancement of national collaboration between defence establishment and industry by systems approach. Journal of Military Studies, 1(1), 44-67. Avadikyan, A., Cohendet, P., & Dupouët, O. (2005). A study of military innovation diffusion based on two case studies. In P. Llerena & M. Mireille (Eds.), Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy (pp. 161-190). New York, NY: Springer. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets. CESPRI Working Papers 150. Milan: Universita' Bocconi. Brzoska, M. (2006). Trends in global military and civilian research and development and their changing interface. In Proceedings of the international seminar on defence finance and economics (pp. 289-302). New Delhi, India. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1(1), 29-53. Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Cerulli, G. (2014). The impact of technological capabilities on invention: An investigation based on country responsiveness scores. World Development, 59, 147-165. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. Cowan, R., & Foray, D. (1995). Quandaries in the economics of dual technologies and spillovers from military to civilian research and development. Research Policy, 24, 851-868. Garcia-Alonso, M., & Smith, R. (2017). The economics of arms export controls. In D. H. Joyner (Ed.), The future of multilateral nonproliferation export controls (pp. 37-54). New York, NY: Routledge. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707. Guichard, R. (2005). Suggested repositioning of defence R&D within the French system of innovation. Technovation, 25(3), 195-201. Jaffe, A. B., & de Rassenfosse, G. (2017). Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(6), 1360-1374. Jaffe, A. B., Fogarty, M. S., & Banks, B. A. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 183-205. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. James, A. D. (2006). The transatlantic defence R&D gap: Causes, consequences and controversies. Defence and Peace Economics, 17, 223-238. James, A. D. (2009). Reevaluating the role of military research in innovation systems: Introduction to the symposium. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 449-454. Kirchberger, M. A., & Pohl, L. (2016). Technology commercialization: A literature review of success factors and antecedents across different contexts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 1077-1112. Kulve, H. T., & Smit, W. A. (2003). Civilian–military co-operation strategies in developing new technologies. Research Policy, 32, 955-970. Lu, W.-M., Kweh, Q. L., Nourani, M., & Huang, F.-W. (2016). Evaluating the efficiency of dual-use technology development programs from the R&D and socio-economic perspectives. Omega, 62, 82-92. Merindol, V., & Versailles, D. W. (2010). Dual-use as knowledge-oriented policy: France during the 1990-2000s. International Journal of Technology Management, 50(1), 80-98. Molas-Gallart, J. (1997). Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of ‘dual-use’ technology transfer. Research Policy, 26, 367-385. Molas-Gallart, J. (1999). Measuring defence R&D: A note on problems and shortcomings. Scientometrics, 45(1), 3-16. Molas-Gallart, J. (2002). Coping with dual-use: A challenge for european research policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(1), 155-165. Mowery, D. C. (2010). Military R&D and innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 1219-1256). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Mowery, D. C. (2012). Defense-related R&D as a model for “Grand Challenges” technology policies. Research Policy, 41, 1703-1715. Rath, J., Ischi, M., & Perkins, D. (2014). Evolution of different dual-use concepts in international and national law and its implications on research ethics and governance. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 769-790. Reppy, J. (2006). Managing dual-use technology in an age of uncertainty. The Forum, 4(1), 1-10. Stowsky, J. (2004). Secrets to shield or share? New dilemmas for military R&D policy in the digital age. Research Policy, 33, 257-269. Willett, S. (1994). Dragon's fire and tiger's claws: Arms trade and production in Far East Asia. Contemporary Security Policy, 15(2), 112-135. Williams-Jones, B., Olivier, C., & Smith, E. (2014). Governing 'dual-use' research in Canada: A policy review. Science and Public Policy, 41(1), 76-93. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/123080 |