Ekpeyong, Paul (2025): Artificial Intelligence, Task Automation and Macro-development: Modelling the productivity- welfare trade offs in the Nigeria Economy.
![]() |
PDF
MPRA_paper_125347.pdf Download (667kB) |
Abstract
This paper focuses on analyzing the implications of adopting generative artificial intelligence (AI) at the macroeconomic level in Nigeria through a task-based method of analysis informed by Acemoglu in 2018. In breaking the production process into individual tasks that are carried out either by labor or capital, the study then examines the impact of automation and task complementarities resulting due to AI, on productivity, gross domestic product (GDP), wages, and inequality due to a 10-year time frame. Based on the empirical estimates recorded by some related literatures regarding the effects of capital stock on the total factor productivity (TFP) of three economies, the paper is likely to improve by 0.51% to 0.66% depending on the growth of the capital stock; this translates to an increment in GDP of about 0.93 to 1.16 per cent. Every 10,000 when capital investment is higher by an upper scenario, GDP will increase by up to 1.56 percent. Nonetheless, the welfare issues arise due to the occurrence of bad jobs like misinformation and digital manipulation, which may have the potential to negate up to 0.072 percent gain in the GDP. Demographic and education-based impacts differ as the workers with low educational skills have a slight advantage, whereas those with high skills remain unaffected. Income share held by capital also will increase boosting inequality. The paper highlights the importance of focus on inclusive AI approaches, ethical governance and investments in digital infrastructure in Nigeria. Generative AI is promising in its economic development but will depend on the institutional decisions on its usage, their regulatory rules, and deliberate integration with national development plans.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Artificial Intelligence, Task Automation and Macro-development: Modelling the productivity- welfare trade offs in the Nigeria Economy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Artificial intelligence, Labor, Automation, Economic growth, Total factor productivity |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination |
Item ID: | 125347 |
Depositing User: | MR PAUL EKPEYONG |
Date Deposited: | 01 Aug 2025 11:45 |
Last Modified: | 01 Aug 2025 11:45 |
References: | Acemoglu, D. (2021). Harms of AI (No. w29247). National Bureau of Economic Research. Acemoglu, D. (2024). The simple macroeconomics of AI (NBER Working Paper No. 32487). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w32487 Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1043-1171). Elsevier. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 197-236). University of Chicago Press. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American economic review, 108(6), 1488-1542. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of economic perspectives, 33(2), 3-30. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of political economy, 128(6), 2188-2244. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of political economy, 128(6), 2188-2244. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(1), 25-35. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Tasks, automation, and the rise in US wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5), 1973-2016: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19815. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., Hazell, J., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies. Journal of Labor Economics, 40(S1), S293-S340. Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. American economic review, 110(3), 629-676. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889-942. Cooley, T. F. (2011). Carnegie-NYU-Rochester Conference on Public Policy. NSF Award, 10(1061740), 61740. Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023). Gpts are gpts: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10130. Ernst, E., Merola, R., & Samaan, D. (2019). Economics of artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 9(1), 1-35. Frank, M. R., Ahn, Y. Y., & Moro, E. (2025). AI exposure predicts unemployment risk: A new approach to technology-driven job loss. PNAS nexus, 4(4), pgaf107. Goldman Sachs. (2023). The Potentially Large Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Economic Growth. Global Economics Analyst, April 2023: Accessed at: https://www.gspublishing.com/content/research/en/reports/2023/03/27/d64e052b-0f6e-45d7-967b-d7be35fabd16.html Humlum, A. (2022). Robot adoption and labor market dynamics. Berlin, Germany: Rockwool Foundation Research Unit. Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005). General purpose technologies. In Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1, pp. 1181-1224). Elsevier. Klopfer, E., Reich, J., Abelson, H., & Breazeal, C. (2024). Generative AI and K-12 education: An MIT perspective. McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier. McKinsey & Company, June 2023: Accessed at https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2022). Labor Force Statistics: Unemployment and Underemployment Report Q4 2022.: https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/elibrary/read/1241365 National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Nigerian Business Survey on Technology and Innovation 2023. https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/ National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA). (2023). National Artificial Intelligence Strategy for Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy. Retrieved from https://nitda.gov.ng Nordhaus, W. D. (2021). Are we approaching an economic singularity? information technology and the future of economic growth. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 299-332. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187-192. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press. Przybylski, A. K., Nguyen, T. V. T., Law, W., & Weinstein, N. (2021). Does taking a short break from social media have a positive effect on well-being? Evidence from three preregistered field experiments. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 6(3), 507-514. Svanberg, M. S. (2023). The economic advantage of computer vision over human labor, and its market implications (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Zhang, M. (2025). Book Review: Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/125347 |